WazirX终止与Liminal的合作关系-最新加密货币新闻

币界网Publicado a 2024-08-14Actualizado a 2024-08-14

币界网报道:

在去年7月发生的2.3亿美元攻击事件之后,加密货币交易所WazirX决定终止与加密货币托管服务提供商Liminal的关系。黑客事件导致交易所45%的客户资金损失,引发了面临提款问题和透明度问题的用户的愤怒。

内容隐藏1谁负责?2用户反应3关键要点4透明度承诺

谁负责?

袭击发生后,WazirX和Liminal相互指责,使用户对其资金的安全性感到不确定。WazirX声称他们没有发生安全漏洞,但在Liminal的界面上发现了后续的安全问题。另一方面,利米纳尔声称,资金本可以在袭击发生后立即转移,他们在此期间为客户提供了全力支持。访问NEWSLINKER获取最新技术新闻。

WazirX已启动将客户资产转移到新的多签名钱包的过程,以加强安全措施。该公司强调,这一步骤旨在最大限度地提高资产安全性,并承诺在迁移完成后公布新钱包列表,以提高透明度。

用户反应

WazirX面临着无法提取资金的用户的强烈批评,并对交易所缺乏透明度表示担忧。联合创始人Nischal Shetty要求用户在问题解决时保持耐心,并向他们保证,在资产迁移过程中会非常谨慎。

关键要点

重要见解:

    WazirX在2.3亿美元的黑客攻击中损失了45%的客户资金。WazirX和Liminal都在指责对方的安全漏洞。WazirX正在转向多签名钱包以增强安全性。用户担心透明度,并批评了交易所。WazirX承诺在迁移完成后发布新钱包列表。

为了应对这一影响,WazirX正在努力实施更安全的存储方法,并通过确保向新钱包系统的透明过渡来重新获得用户信任。这种情况突显了加密货币交易行业安全性和透明度的至关重要性。

透明度承诺

WazirX承诺将继续采取措施提高透明度,以重建客户信任,防止未来发生类似事件。这些措施被认为对恢复加密货币市场的信心至关重要。

这种情况突显了安全在加密世界中的重要作用以及公司行为对用户信心的影响。业界正在密切关注WazirX将如何应对这些挑战。

您可以在Telegram、Twitter(X)和Coinmarketcap上关注我们的新闻。免责声明:本文所含信息不构成投资建议。投资者应该意识到加密货币具有高波动性,因此存在风险,应该进行自己的研究。

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details serious allegations of fraud against Bitcoin infrastructure company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. In June 2024, investigative account NatInfoSec published a report accusing Blockstream's mining note (BMN) program of potentially operating a multi-billion dollar scheme with Ponzi-like characteristics. The core allegations focus on Blockstream Mining Notes (BMNs), which offer investors fixed annual yields up to approximately 20% from Bitcoin mining. NatInfoSec's investigation raises several key issues: 1. **Suspicious Hashrate & Payout Capacity**: The analysis suggests Blockstream would need 20-45 EH/s of mining power to cover its BMN obligations, but its public dashboard shows only around 15 EH/s. Furthermore, no verifiable public evidence (e.g., grid connection records, import data) was found to support the massive mining operation required. 2. **Questionable Payout Source**: The BMN contract allows Blockstream to use Bitcoin from *any source* (Substitute Performance BTC) to fulfill investor payouts, raising concerns that payouts may not come from actual mining revenue. 3. **High-Risk, Fixed Returns**: Offering ~20% fixed yields in the volatile, cyclical Bitcoin mining industry is viewed as highly unusual and requires clear explanation. 4. **Undisclosed Criminal Record of Key Figure**: Christopher William Cook, a key figure in Blockstream's mining operations and CEO of spin-off Exacore, was found to have a federal felony conviction for mail fraud in 2008, a fact not disclosed in BMN offering documents. His background was also allegedly embellished. 5. **Potential Contagion to BSTR SPAC**: Questions were raised about whether these liabilities and Cook's record should have been disclosed in the SEC filings for Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a separate Adam Back-associated firm planning a SPAC merger. The crypto community is divided. BitMEX Research validated Cook's criminal record and expressed concern over the high yields but found other evidence lacking or misleading, noting the legal separation between BMN, Blockstream, and BSTR. Blockstream defenders, like Samson Mow, argue the mining is real. Critics, however, emphasize the lack of independent, verifiable proof of the mining operation's scale and the true source of investor payouts. The article concludes that BMN remains shrouded in key unanswered questions regarding its actual size, the verifiability of its underlying mining assets and payouts, the source of its high yields, and the full role and disclosure concerning Chris Cook. Blockstream had not issued a comprehensive response at the time of writing.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

The Full Story of How Crypto Unicorn Blockstream Is Mired in Serious Fraud Allegations

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

This article details allegations of serious fraud surrounding the crypto company Blockstream, founded by Bitcoin pioneer Adam Back. Investigation account NatInfoSec accuses Blockstream of raising billions through its Blockstream Mining Note (BMN) products, which offer high fixed yields of up to 20% from purported mining revenue. The core allegations are: 1) Blockstream's public mining hash rate (15 EH/s) appears insufficient to cover the massive payout obligations from sold BMN notes, raising questions about the true source of investor payouts. 2) Key executive Christopher William Cook, central to the mining operations, has a prior federal conviction for mail fraud, a fact not disclosed to investors. Cook's background and lavish lifestyle are highlighted as red flags. 3) The structure allows payouts from any source of BTC, not necessarily mining revenue, which critics argue gives it Ponzi-like characteristics. The controversy also touches on Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), a related entity planning a SPAC上市. Critics question whether BMN's liabilities and Cook's record should be disclosed in BSTR's filings. BitMEX Research offered a tempered analysis, confirming Cook's criminal record is likely true and the high yields concerning, but found other claims like insufficient抵押证据 less substantiated. Community debate centers on the need for verifiable proof of Blockstream's mining output and revenue. The article concludes that while fraud is not proven, BMN presents significant, unresolved questions regarding its actual scale, the source of its high fixed returns, the verifiability of its mining operations and payouts, and the full disclosure of associated risks and personnel backgrounds. Blockstream has not yet issued a formal response.

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

The Full Story Behind Encryption Unicorn Blockstream's Deep Entanglement in Serious Fraud Allegations

链捕手Hace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片