21Shares Secures Approval to Launch Spot Dogecoin ETF on Nasdaq

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-12Actualizado a 2026-01-12

Resumen

21Shares has received approval to launch a spot Dogecoin ETF on the Nasdaq under the ticker TDOG. This marks the third such ETF after Grayscale and Bitwise introduced similar products in November. The ETF is designed to track the CF Dogecoin–Dollar US Settlement Price Index, with custody services provided by Coinbase, Anchorage Digital, and BitGo. At the time of writing, Dogecoin's price was trading at $0.136, down 2.06% from its intraday high, while daily trading volume surged over 150% to $1.23 billion. Technical indicators show a neutral RSI at 48 and a stabilizing MACD, with key support at $0.13–$0.125 and resistance near $0.145–$0.15.

21Shares has officially entered the spot Dogecoin ETF race, announcing its product with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. As it follows an automatic approval to list on the Nasdaq stock market under the ticker TDOG.

As per the 21Shares filing to the U.S. SEC, it has submitted its final prospectus to launch its Dogecoin ETF, which clearly shows the progress toward its launch this week.

This ETF joins the expanding list of Dogecoin-focused investment instruments, which secures the third spot Dogecoin ETF to launch after Grayscale Dogecoin ETF (GDOG) and Bitwise Dogecoin ETF (BWOW) launched in November. With that, the broadening ETF market could boost market interest and support price gains for DOGE.

As the Exchange-Traded Funds are passive funds designed to track the price of Dogecoin alongside other cryptocurrencies, gaining mainstream investment exposure, while the 21Shares spot Dogecoin ETF is designed to track the CF Dogecoin–Dollar US Settlement Price Index, where the custody services are provided by Coinbase Custody, Anchorage Digital Bank, and BitGo Bank & Trust.

DOGE Price Shows Mixed Signals

While the article is being written, Dogecoin price is trading at $0.136, down about 2.06% from its intraday high, which was around $0.14237. But the market interest was raised, as the daily trading volume increased by more than 150% to $1.23 billion, despite the increased trading activity surges, DOGE’s price movement is mixed.

With that, analysing the 1-day chart of (DOGE/USDT), the Relative Strength Index (RSI) sits near 48, sitting in the neutral territory, neither overbought nor oversold region, which puts it right in the middle ground, not showing any extreme buying or selling pressure.

Meanwhile, the Moving Average Divergence and Convergence (MACD) is still in positive territory but has started to settle down. So, the immediate support is located between $0.13 and $0.125, while resistance remains near the $0.145–$0.15 range; a strong break above this is needed to confirm the next direction.

Highlighted Crypto News:

South Korea Plans to End Corporate Crypto Ban With 5% Equity Cap

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the ticker symbol for the 21Shares Spot Dogecoin ETF on the Nasdaq?

AThe ticker symbol for the 21Shares Spot Dogecoin ETF is TDOG.

QWhich two companies had already launched a spot Dogecoin ETF before 21Shares?

AGrayscale and Bitwise had already launched spot Dogecoin ETFs (GDOG and BWOW) before 21Shares.

QWhat index is the 21Shares spot Dogecoin ETF designed to track?

AThe 21Shares spot Dogecoin ETF is designed to track the CF Dogecoin–Dollar US Settlement Price Index.

QWhat was the approximate daily trading volume for Dogecoin mentioned in the article, and what was its percentage increase?

AThe daily trading volume for Dogecoin was approximately $1.23 billion, representing an increase of more than 150%.

QAccording to the technical analysis in the article, what is the key resistance level for DOGE's price?

AThe key resistance level for DOGE's price is near the $0.145–$0.15 range.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHace 20 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHace 24 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHace 24 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 40 min(s)

Trading

Spot