Where Did XRP Come From? Former Ripple Exec Drops Bombshell Story

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-01-31Actualizado a 2026-01-31

Resumen

Former Ripple executive David Schwartz recently participated in a public Q&A on X, revealing key historical insights about XRP and Ripple company origins. He attributed the term "drop" for XRP's smallest unit to Arthur Britto, a primary architect of the XRP Ledger, whom he praised for possessing rare and exceptional intelligence. Schwartz clarified that Ripple’s name and its association with the Grateful Dead song were coincidental, stemming from the acquisition of the ripple.com domain from a fan. He highlighted Britto’s foundational contributions, including the built-in decentralized exchange and pathfinding for multi-source payments on the XRP Ledger. When pressed about XRP’s price potential, Schwartz declined to dismiss the possibility of high values like $50 or $100, recalling his past underestimation of crypto price surges.

An interactive question-and-answer session between members of the community and David Schwartz has peeled back another layer of early XRP and Ripple history.

The discussion unfolded publicly on the social media platform X, where users posed a series of questions touching on the token’s smallest unit, the creative forces behind the XRP Ledger, and even some forgotten cultural details from Ripple’s early internet presence. The responses from Schwartz offered rare insights into the personalities and ideas that shaped Ripple and the Ledger in its formative years.

Ripple Name, Drop, And The Role Of Arthur Britto

The exchange began when an XRP community member known as Bird asked Schwartz who came up with the term “drop” as the name for the smallest unit of the altcoin. The question was for clarifying historical details for documentation purposes. Schwartz replied that he could not say with absolute certainty, but he believed the idea came from Arthur Britto, one of the primary architects of the XRP Ledger.

Schwartz then expanded beyond the naming question and offered a personal comparison between himself and Britto. He described himself as having the same kind of intelligence as most people, just more of it, but said Britto possessed something entirely different, a rare quality that others simply do not have.

Another community member, Toby, switched the conversation from technical history to cultural curiosity. He asked whether Ripple’s name, which also happens to be a Grateful Dead song, and the appearance of a Dancing Bear on an old Ripple 404 error page were part of some deeper internal joke or inspiration.

According to Schwartz, the only connection he was aware of was purely incidental. The ripple.com domain had been registered by a Grateful Dead fan who secured it because of the song, and Ripple later acquired the domain from that individual.

Reality Check On XRP Price Expectations

As the conversation continued, XRPL validator Vet asked Schwartz to provide a concrete example from the past that demonstrated the special quality he had attributed to Britto. Schwartz responded by pointing to two major ideas that originated with Britto: the concept of a decentralized exchange built directly into the XRP Ledger and the use of pathfinding to allow payments to draw incrementally from multiple liquidity sources.

The tone of the discussion changed again when another user urged Schwartz to publicly tell XRP supporters that the price could never reach figures like $50 or $100. However, Schwartz declined to make such a statement.

He explained that although he personally does not think such price levels are likely, history has taught him caution when declaring what crypto prices cannot do. He recalled thinking XRP was unlikely to reach $0.25 and selling his holdings at $0.10 because it felt irrationally high at the time. This was at a time when Bitcoin reaching $100 seemed impossible.

XRP trading at $1.74 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWho did David Schwartz credit with coming up with the term 'drop' for the smallest unit of XRP?

ADavid Schwartz believed the idea came from Arthur Britto, one of the primary architects of the XRP Ledger.

QWhat was the connection between Ripple's name and the Grateful Dead song, according to Schwartz?

AThe ripple.com domain was registered by a Grateful Dead fan because of the song, and Ripple later acquired the domain from that individual. The only connection was purely incidental.

QWhat two major ideas did Schwartz attribute to Arthur Britto's unique insight?

AThe concept of a decentralized exchange built directly into the XRP Ledger and the use of pathfinding to allow payments to draw from multiple liquidity sources.

QWhy did David Schwartz decline to state that XRP could never reach prices like $50 or $100?

AHe explained that although he personally does not think such price levels are likely, history has taught him caution when declaring what crypto prices cannot do, citing his past miscalculations with the price of XRP and Bitcoin.

QWhat personal comparison did Schwartz make between himself and Arthur Britto?

ASchwartz described himself as having the same kind of intelligence as most people, just more of it, but said Britto possessed something entirely different, a rare quality that others simply do not have.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Punto de tormenta en los mercados globales: La desapalancamiento del mercado bursátil de Corea está prácticamente completado

Tras una fuerte caída del 32% desde junio, el mercado coreano ha sido el epicentro de la volatilidad global, amplificada por la estructura de apalancamiento concentrado. Sin embargo, el proceso de desapalancamiento forzoso está alcanzando su fase final. Las principales fuentes de inestabilidad, los ETF apalancados y los fondos de cobertura, han reducido significativamente su exposición. Se estima que los ETF apalancados han eliminado aproximadamente el 75% del exceso, pasando de 500 mil millones a 260 mil millones de USD, y su tamaño debería converger hacia niveles sostenibles, apoyado por nuevas regulaciones estrictas de las autoridades. Por su parte, los fondos de cobertura han reducido su apalancamiento en más del 50%. El riesgo sistémico de los préstamos al consumo para inversión es limitado, con un balance que representa solo el 0.5% de la capitalización bursátil, muy por debajo de los niveles de EE.UU. o China, y sin un mecanismo de reequilibrio diario que desencadene ventas en cascada. En resumen, las estructuras de alto apalancamiento que provocaron la espiral de ventas se han purgado en gran medida. El mercado está pasando de una caída impulsada por la liquidez a una valoración impulsada por los fundamentos. Si la tendencia subyacente de la IA permanece intacta, esta corrección representa más una limpieza de posiciones congestionadas que el fin del ciclo. La disrupción tecnológica sigue su curso, y la volatilidad actual puede ser el costo de participar en esta transición estructural, no un riesgo terminal para la tesis de inversión.

链捕手Hace 52 min(s)

Punto de tormenta en los mercados globales: La desapalancamiento del mercado bursátil de Corea está prácticamente completado

链捕手Hace 52 min(s)

Fragmentos Eternos del Dinero: Los Pagos de Terceros No Tienen una Primera Naturaleza

El artículo analiza la actual situación de la industria de pagos, centrándose en los retos de Stripe y PayPal. Stripe, tras perder su ventana de IPO durante la pandemia, ha visto caer su valoración y busca crecimiento mediante adquisiciones, como su posible compra de PayPal. La autora argumenta que la industria de pagos está altamente fragmentada y es inherentemente dependiente de la banca tradicional, lo que limita el crecimiento disruptivo. Stripe intentó innovar apostando por las stablecoins (como OUSD) y la economía de los agentes IA (Agentic Payment) para acceder al mercado minorista (C2C) y crear nuevos modelos, pero estos esfuerzos no han replicado su éxito inicial con desarrolladores. Las stablecoins, aunque prometedoras, aún no son mainstream y los agentes IA se usan principalmente para inflar volúmenes de transacciones. El futuro de empresas como Stripe y Circle podría estar en construir redes de liquidación (clearing) eficientes sobre sus blockchains (Tempo y Arc), aprovechando licencias bancarias para capturar valor más allá de las simples comisiones por transacción. Sin embargo, la autora concluye que la industria de pagos es un campo de batalla permanente, donde la escala no garantiza la victoria debido a las barreras locales y regulatorias. La pregunta final es si este nuevo enfoque en eficiencia y liquidación tendrá éxito donde otros han fracasado.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Fragmentos Eternos del Dinero: Los Pagos de Terceros No Tienen una Primera Naturaleza

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片