US Market Structure Bill Delayed and Deferred Again — Is a 2026 Passage Possible?

ccn.comPublicado a 2026-01-22Actualizado a 2026-01-22

Resumen

The US crypto market structure bill, which aims to provide regulatory clarity, has faced another delay in the Senate as of January 2026. Key factors include Coinbase withdrawing support, citing concerns over stablecoin yield bans and expanded SEC authority. Competing legislative priorities, partisan disagreements, and the upcoming midterm elections further complicate its passage. A competing version from the Senate Agriculture Committee may advance, but the overall timeline remains uncertain. While 2026 passage is still possible, analysts estimate a 50–60% chance, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC.

Key Takeaways

  • Senate consideration of the crypto market structure bill stalled again in January 2026 after Coinbase withdrew its support.
  • A competing version from the Senate Agriculture Committee could move forward soon, with a potential hearing as early as Jan. 27.
  • Passage in 2026 remains possible, but midterm elections and unresolved regulatory disputes make the outcome increasingly uncertain.

Crypto’s long-awaited path to regulatory clarity in the U.S. just hit another roadblock .

After months of negotiations, industry lobbying, and bipartisan signaling, momentum around Washington’s flagship crypto market structure bill is once again slowing.

Behind the scenes, shifting political priorities, growing industry pushback, and committee-level maneuvering are reshaping the bill’s timeline—raising fresh questions about whether 2026 will finally deliver the rules the crypto sector has been waiting for.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitget<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitget

promotions
New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.
Coins
88
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitunix<\/h3>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitunix

promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
151
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
BTCC<\/h3>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

BTCC

promotions
Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.
Coins
162
Claim Offer
Explore All Offers

Another Delay?

The U.S. crypto market structure bill cleared the House in mid-2025, but momentum has repeatedly stalled in the Senate.

Lawmakers released an updated draft earlier this month and scheduled a new meeting for Jan. 27, raising hopes of progress after weeks of uncertainty.

Those hopes remain fragile. Industry pushback, partisan negotiations, and shifting legislative priorities have repeatedly delayed the bill.

As of January 2026, Senate markups have been postponed again, with consideration now likely pushed to late February or March.

Competing priorities—particularly housing affordability legislation tied to President Trump’s agenda—have taken precedence.

A floor vote may not occur until after the Jan. 30 deadline for a stopgap government funding bill, further complicating the timeline.

The bill also faces structural hurdles. It requires approval from multiple committees, and negotiations between Republicans and Democrats remain tense.

Republicans have pushed for lighter oversight under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), while Democrats have emphasized stronger consumer protections.

Lawmakers such as Sen. Debbie Stabenow have raised concerns over provisions affecting DeFi and tokenized equities, and the draft has ballooned to more than 100 amendments—an indicator of how far consensus remains.

Reasons For Delay

Several factors have contributed to the latest setbacks.

Coinbase, the largest U.S. crypto exchange, withdrew its support for the Senate draft on Jan. 15, 2026, citing “too many issues,” including proposed bans on stablecoin yield and expanded SEC authority over crypto markets.

CEO Brian Armstrong called the draft “materially worse than the status quo.”

The move dealt a major blow to the bill, as Coinbase’s support was seen as critical to maintaining industry consensus.

With midterm elections approaching in November 2026, lawmakers are increasingly prioritizing voter-focused issues such as housing affordability.

Funding measures and other Trump-backed initiatives are taking precedence, potentially pushing crypto legislation further down the agenda.

Political polarization and the bill’s complexity have also fueled concerns that partisan point-scoring could derail progress.

A shift in Senate control during the midterms could further jeopardize the bill’s chances.

In the meantime, the SEC and CFTC are pursuing rulemaking and potential “exemptive relief” that could ease certain regulatory burdens without new legislation.

While this may reduce near-term pressure to pass the bill, it falls short of the comprehensive framework the industry has been seeking.

Overall, analysts estimate a 50–60% chance of passage in 2026, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory authority in the coming months.

2026 CLARITY Act Still Possible?

Despite the delays, passage in 2026 is still possible. If markups resume in late February and key disputes are resolved, the bill could advance.

However, the approaching November midterm elections add political risk, as shifting control of Congress could derail the effort entirely.

In the meantime, regulators may attempt to fill the gap.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins has signaled a significant easing of enforcement pressure through rulemaking and exemptive relief, offering some short-term breathing room for the industry even as comprehensive legislation remains stalled.

At its core, the market structure bill aims to clarify the regulatory divide between the SEC and CFTC, define when crypto tokens qualify as securities or commodities, and establish clearer rules around stablecoins, DeFi, and consumer protections.

Whether those goals can survive the current political logjam will shape the U.S. crypto landscape for years to come.

Top Picks for Bitcoin
  • Best Exchanges for Bitcoin Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Bitcoin Fast & Easy How To Buy Bitcoin With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Bitcoin See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy was the US crypto market structure bill delayed again in January 2026?

AThe bill was delayed due to Coinbase withdrawing its support, shifting political priorities such as housing affordability legislation, partisan negotiations, and the complexity of the bill with over 100 amendments.

QWhat are the key differences between the Republican and Democratic positions on the crypto market structure bill?

ARepublicans push for lighter oversight under the CFTC, while Democrats emphasize stronger consumer protections and have raised concerns about provisions affecting DeFi and tokenized equities.

QWhat impact did Coinbase's withdrawal of support have on the bill?

ACoinbase's withdrawal dealt a major blow to the bill, as its support was critical for maintaining industry consensus, citing issues like proposed bans on stablecoin yield and expanded SEC authority.

QIs passage of the crypto market structure bill still possible in 2026, and what are the chances?

APassage in 2026 is still possible with an estimated 50-60% chance, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory authority, but midterm elections add political risk.

QHow are regulators like the SEC and CFTC addressing crypto regulation in the absence of the bill?

AThe SEC and CFTC are pursuing rulemaking and potential 'exemptive relief' to ease certain regulatory burdens, though this falls short of the comprehensive framework the industry seeks.

Lecturas Relacionadas

El Trilema de la Escalabilidad es un Falso Problema

Autor: Billy Gao Traducción: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher El sistema criptográfico más potente de la historia no puede proteger la privacidad de tus fondos. Cada transacción y cada posición se emiten públicamente en la cadena de bloques. La cadena de bloques es esencialmente una computadora compartida, lenta, costosa y sin propietario. Su principal ventaja es que nadie puede evitar que la uses ni engañarte sobre los resultados. La "trilema" tradicional —descentralización, escalabilidad, seguridad— ha sido en gran medida superada, pero no es el principal obstáculo. El problema real son dos defectos de diseño: la legitimidad y la falta de privacidad. La transparencia total en las cadenas públicas no es una característica positiva, es un impuesto que se paga en forma de MEV, front-running y exposición financiera. Los fondos (como las monedas estables) son el caso de uso ideal para la cadena, ya que el registro en el libro mayor es el activo en sí mismo. Sin embargo, el capital institucional y los grandes patrimonios no participan porque no exponen públicamente sus balances. La legitimidad está mejorando con marcos regulatorios, pero la privacidad sigue siendo la gran barrera. La privacidad con cumplimiento normativo demostrable, basada en pruebas criptográficas de conocimiento cero, es la solución. Permite verificar hechos (solvencia, KYC) sin revelar datos subyacentes, combinando privacidad y transparencia necesaria. Esto representa una mejora pura respecto al modelo actual y es el puente para atraer billones en capital hacia la cadena.

链捕手Hace 6 hora(s)

El Trilema de la Escalabilidad es un Falso Problema

链捕手Hace 6 hora(s)

Las stablecoins finalmente encuentran rendimientos reales: Un análisis detallado del reaseguro en cadena Re | Diálogo con el fundador de Re, Karan Saroya

Establemente las monedas finalmente encuentran rendimientos reales: Re, una plataforma de reaseguro en cadena, absorbe monedas estables de DeFi y las utiliza como garantía para respaldar a aseguradoras estadounidenses, devolviendo las primas obtenidas a los depositantes en cadena. Actualmente respalda a 35 aseguradoras, con un negocio suscrito de 5 mil millones de dólares, y planea superar los 10 mil millones en siete meses. **Puntos clave:** 1. **Fuente de rendimiento real:** Ofrece a los tenedores de monedas estables un rendimiento anual del 12%-14% o más, proveniente del mercado de reaseguro (un billón de dólares), no correlacionado con los mercados tradicionales. 2. **Eficiencia operativa:** Los contratos inteligentes reemplazan los costosos procesos tradicionales de captación de capital, permitiendo a un equipo pequeño competir con gigantes del sector. 3. **Apalancamiento regulatorio:** Por cada 1 dólar de garantía, se pueden respaldar 5-7 dólares en primas, multiplicando los rendimientos. 4. **Integración con DeFi:** Los depositantes reciben un token que puede reutilizarse en protocolos como Morpho para aumentar aún más el rendimiento. 5. **Token de gobernanza RE:** Inspirado en Lloyd's of London, permite a los poseedores gobernar la dirección del capital y los parámetros del sistema. Re representa un punto de inflexión, conectando el capital en cadena con la economía real y proporcionando la demanda necesaria para la infraestructura DeFi existente. Su arquitectura combina un frente regulado con un backend descentralizado eficiente.

链捕手Hace 9 hora(s)

Las stablecoins finalmente encuentran rendimientos reales: Un análisis detallado del reaseguro en cadena Re | Diálogo con el fundador de Re, Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 9 hora(s)

¿1996 o 1999? La primera prueba de Walsh es 'cómo ver la IA'

El nuevo presidente de la Reserva Federal, Wash, enfrenta su primera gran prueba: determinar si el auge actual de la IA se asemeja más al escenario económico de 1996 o al de 1999. Esta decisión definirá la política monetaria y su legado. Por un lado, está la visión optimista, que asemeja a 1996, donde un crecimiento impulsado por ganancias de productividad permitiría a la Fed mantenerse paciente mientras la inflación retrocede. Wash ha mostrado simpatía por esta narrativa, advirtiendo contra el error de sofocar prematuramente un boom de productividad. Por otro lado, la visión cautelosa, similar a 1999, sostiene que la demanda ya se está calentando y esperar datos concluyentes de productividad podría forzar subidas de tasas más agresivas después. Chicago Fed's Goolsbee argumenta que, al ser un boom ampliamente anticipado, la IA podría inflar la demanda antes de materializar la oferta, presionando la inflación. Wash opera en un contexto más difícil que el de Greenspan en los 90, con presión arancelaria, alto déficit fiscal y menos ventajas globales. Un dilema adicional es su deseo de eliminar la "guía anticipada" de la Fed, un mecanismo creado precisamente en 1999 para gestionar expectativas. Si la economía se recalienta, podría verse forzado a usarlo o arriesgar volatilidad en los mercados. La respuesta a la pregunta central —¿1996 o 1999?— resolverá este y otros dilemas.

marsbitHace 10 hora(s)

¿1996 o 1999? La primera prueba de Walsh es 'cómo ver la IA'

marsbitHace 10 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片