Holding The Line

insights.glassnodePublicado a 2025-10-01Actualizado a 2025-10-02

Excerpt

Bitcoin continues to defend key on-chain support at the short-term holder cost basis, while ETFs and cooling LTH supply offer stability. Options markets reset post-expiry, with OI rebuilding, volatility easing, and flows tilting toward cautious Q4 upside.

Executive Summary

  • Bitcoin repeatedly defended the short-term holder cost basis, underscoring its role as a key pivot between bullish continuation and bearish risk. Price faces strong resistance at the $118k supply cluster, where recent top buyers may look to exit.
  • Long-term holder distribution has cooled after months of steady selling, and ETF inflows have resumed, providing a stabilizing influence on market structure. Together, these dynamics point to healthier demand-side conditions.
  • The Fear & Greed Index has retreated from sustained Greed into Neutral and Fear territory, reflecting profit-taking and reduced risk appetite. RVT trends confirm this cooling backdrop, with fewer profits realized relative to network value.
  • Options open interest reset after last week’s record expiry, now rebuilding into Q4. This reset clears hedging-driven noise and leaves room for new positioning to guide price action.
  • Volatility signals are easing, with front-end IV declining and skew moving closer to neutral. The term structure remains in contango, with back-end IV holding firm in the 39–43% range.
  • Flows show cautious upside interest, with traders adding risk reversals and cheap convexity while selling puts. This positioning reflects measured optimism aligned with seasonal “Uptober” dynamics.
  • Dealer gamma exposure is balanced across both sides, muting hedging flows and helping dampen intraday volatility. With no large expiries ahead, the near-term backdrop remains stable and neutral.
💡
View all charts in this edition in The Week On-chain Dashboard.

Holding the Line

Bitcoin’s FOMC rally quickly reversed as profit-taking pushed prices down to $109k, slipping below the short-term holder cost basis at $111.6k. The decline was met with strong buy-side demand, driving a rebound toward $118.8k. This report explores key on-chain and options indicators to assess market dynamics and gauge prevailing expectations among speculative participants.

On-Chain Outlook

Holding the Line

Building on this rebound, the short-term holder cost basis has once again emerged as a critical pivot. Since May 2025, this level has acted as support on five separate occasions, underscoring its role as a defining boundary between bullish and bearish regimes.

Each successful defense reinforces investor conviction and highlights the sensitivity of short-term capital to this threshold. Sustaining above this cost basis improves the odds of further upside, while it does not guarantee continuation.

Live Chart

Supply Overhang

However, sustaining momentum requires clearing a significant hurdle. The recent bounce now faces a dense supply cluster accumulated between late August and the $114k–$118k range. Holders who bought near these highs may view the rebound as an opportunity to exit at break-even or modest profit, creating notable overhead resistance.

Overcoming this wave of sell pressure is crucial before the market can attempt another push toward new all-time highs. A decisive stabilization above $118k would signal that demand is absorbing the top-buyers’ supply, strengthening the case for further upside.

Live Chart

Cooling Payload

Despite price repeatedly finding support around the short-term holder cost basis, a longer-term trend is emerging beneath the surface. The Short-Term Holder Realized Value (RVT) ratio, which measures the economic value realized relative to the nominal value transferred, has steadily declined since May.

Elevated RVT values often indicate overheated markets, while contractions toward the “Full Market Detox” zone point to fading speculative excess.

At present, RVT is well below peak extremes, suggesting short-term holders are realizing fewer profits relative to overall network activity. Should RVT compress further and combine with capitulation signals, it could usher in an accumulation phase as investors wait for clearer market direction.

Live Chart

Fear or Disbelief?

As the broader backdrop of cooling speculative activity unfolds, sentiment has followed suit. The Bitcoin Fear & Greed Index has shifted sharply lower, sliding from sustained Greed earlier this year into Fear and Neutral territory. This shift signals profit-taking, reduced risk appetite, and a more cautious stance among participants.

While sentiment resets can weigh on momentum in the short term, they also tend to clear excessive optimism and create conditions for healthier bases of support. Current readings point to a consolidation phase, with the market waiting for renewed conviction before committing to a decisive directional move.

Live Chart

LTH Supply Shift

Alongside the overhead pressure from top buyers, the balance between Long-Term Holders (LTHs) and ETFs has shaped recent price action. Over the past several weeks, LTHs have acted as a core source of supply, locking in profits during rallies. However, the Long-Term Holders Net Position Change (3D) has now shifted toward neutral, signaling a slowdown in distribution after months of consistent selling. This cooling supply pressure suggests that the recent phase of long-term holder profit-taking may be easing, potentially leaving ETFs and new inflows as more decisive drivers of market direction.

Live Chart

ETF Flows Steadying

Complementing the slowdown in long-term holder distribution, US Spot Bitcoin ETFs remain a central force in market structure. Flows have been volatile in recent months, with mid-September’s strong inflows followed by a string of outflow sessions.

The most recent data, however, point to a return of net inflows, underscoring that institutional appetite remains intact despite ongoing profit rotation. Should this renewed demand align with reduced LTH selling, ETFs could provide a stabilizing force, offering a more constructive foundation for price resilience and supporting the conditions needed for a sustainable advance.

Live Chart

Options Market Outlook

Next, our focus shifts from on-chain signals to the options market for deeper context. Following last week’s record expiry, open interest has sharply reset and is now rebuilding into Q4. In this report, we examine positioning, volatility, and flows to evaluate how options traders are shaping expectations for Bitcoin’s next phase.

Post-Expiry Reset

As of 08:00 UTC, Wednesday 1 October, Bitcoin has digested its largest options expiry on record, triggering a sharp reduction in open interest across expiries and strikes. This mechanical reset removes hedging-driven noise and leaves the market clearer for new positioning into Q4. Historically, major expiries often underpin price action, with the subsequent rebuild in OI reflecting more deliberate views on direction and volatility.

The current phase, therefore, marks a cleaner ground for assessing how traders are positioning into the next leg of the cycle.

Live Chart

Volatility Landscape

Following the reset in open interest, attention shifts to the volatility surface, where short-dated premiums have eased. One-week at-the-money implied volatility fell by nearly 5%points from last week’s highs, while the two-week tenor declined by about 2%. In contrast, longer-dated maturities held steady or edged slightly higher, leaving the curve steeper overall. This structure reflects a market where near-term stress has faded, yet caution persists further out the curve.

Despite the front-end retreat, implied volatility remains elevated relative to realized, keeping carry trades positive, though less compelling than a week earlier. The term structure remains in contango, with short-dated contracts anchored around 30% IV, while three-month and longer maturities hold between 39% and 43%. The steepening highlights a shift from short-term risk hedging to more measured, longer-dated caution.

Live Chart

Skew Nears Neutral

Building on the softer front-end volatility, option skew has also moderated. The 25-Delta Risk Reversal in one-week contracts fell sharply from roughly 18.5 vol points to around 6 vol points, marking a significant move away from downside protection toward balance. Longer maturities have also flattened, drifting closer to neutral territory. This adjustment reflects cooling demand for puts as immediate downside stress eases, while call premiums begin to catch up. Together, the shift signals a more balanced risk outlook, where traders are less focused on hedging tail risk and more willing to express directional upside.

Live Chart

Flows: Upside Interest Returns

With skew moving toward neutral, positioning has shifted toward the call side. Traders have been lifting upside calls in line with the typical Q4 seasonal bias, with net call premium concentrated in the $136k–$145k range. Higher strikes, however, saw call selling, suggesting the market is not chasing extreme upside but instead using structure to capture cheap convexity.

Flows also show a preference for strategies that monetize skew while retaining optionality into year-end catalysts. Put selling has picked up as well, consistent with the skew compression noted earlier. Overall, traders appear to have used last week’s pullback to add risk reversals—selling puts and buying calls—positioning for Q4 optionality and the seasonal “Uptober” narrative.

Live Chart

Dealer Gamma: Neutral Backdrop

Dealer positioning remains quiet following the record expiry. With open interest normalized back to average levels, the calendar shows no major expiries in the near term. Since gamma effects are most pronounced at-the-money and close to maturity, the absence of large clusters reduces the likelihood of significant dealer-driven hedging flows.

Current positioning is broadly long gamma on both downside and upside strikes, which helps dampen intraday volatility and stabilize spot around prevailing levels. However, these exposures are modest and remain far from any meaningful expiry points, leaving the options market in a neutral state until new positioning builds closer to upcoming dates.

Conclusion

On-chain dynamics continue to highlight the pivotal role of the short-term holder cost basis, which has served as reliable support since May 2025. Price remains challenged by the dense supply cluster between $114k and $118k, yet the easing in long-term holder distribution and the return of ETF inflows suggest stabilizing demand. Sentiment, as measured by RVT and the Fear & Greed Index, points to a cooling phase, with conditions shifting toward consolidation rather than capitulation.

In the options market, the record expiry has reset positioning, with open interest now rebuilding into Q4. Volatility has softened, skew is drifting toward neutral, and the curve remains in contango with a firmer back end. Flows show measured upside interest, while dealer gamma remains broadly balanced, muting hedging flows. Together, these signals suggest a market resetting into a more neutral, constructive backdrop, awaiting conviction for the next decisive move.

Lecturas Relacionadas

La historia de la financiación de DeepSeek

## Resumen del Financiamiento de DeepSeek A mediados de mayo, DeepSeek organizó una legendaria reunión de inversión de cuatro horas vía Tencent Meeting. Los participantes, en su mayoría sin haber conocido en persona al fundador Liang Wenfeng, quedaron profundamente impresionados por su filosofía. Liang enfatizó la búsqueda exclusiva de AGI (Inteligencia Artificial General), la importancia de la estabilidad del equipo por encima del capital, y una narrativa de "personas comunes logrando cosas extraordinarias" con extrema moderación. La ronda de financiamiento, iniciada en abril, ajustó sus términos iniciales: el monto mínimo por fondo se redujo de 5,000 a 1,500 millones de RMB, y se flexibilizó la estructura puramente en RMB, aunque se mantuvo una firme restricción contra la reventa de participaciones a LP extranjeros. La lista final de inversores, encabezada por Monolith Capital (que aumentó su compromiso a 3,000 millones de RMB), IDG Capital y Zhenxingu, generó sorpresa por la ausencia de gigantes como Sequoia China y Hillhouse. Se especula que razones regulatorias o relacionadas con sus LP pudieron influir. Un análisis más detallado revela que, tras una capa de fondos, participan indirectamente cerca de 100 instituciones e individuos, incluyendo capital estatal y corporativo. La principal condición de Liang Wenfeng para los inversores fue clara: no reclutar talento de DeepSeek. Más allá de los números, los inversores perciben en la compañía un profundo propósito, viéndola potencialmente como una futura empresa líder en el mercado bursátil chino. El proceso refleja la inesperada apertura de una empresa antes muy reservada, donde la convicción, el esfuerzo y la alineación filosófica fueron clave para obtener una participación.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

La historia de la financiación de DeepSeek

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Las empresas DAT se lanzan a los 'side hustles'

**Las compañías DAT exploran nuevas vías de negocio** Las compañías que adoptaron la estrategia de Tesorería de Activos Digitales (DAT) se enfrentan a un momento crucial. Con la desaceleración del mercado y la llegada de los ETF de criptomonedas, el modelo original—comprar y mantener criptoactivos financiado con capital de mercado—ha perdido su ventaja. Muchas han abandonado la estrategia, mientras otras se reinventan para sobrevivir. Dos caminos destacan. Por un lado, empresas como SharpLink Gaming y GameSquare se están transformando en plataformas de gestión de activos institucionales y fondos de rendimiento, buscando generar ingresos a través del staking y protocolos DeFi. Por otro lado, actores del ecosistema Solana, como DeFi Development y SOL Strategies, están evolucionando hacia operadores de infraestructura blockchain, ofreciendo servicios de staking líquido y validación. Esta transición colectiva subraya una evolución en la industria: el mero arbitraje financiero ya no es suficiente. El éxito futuro parece depender de la capacidad operativa, la creación de valor real dentro del ecosistema y la construcción de barreras técnicas o de red. Aunque estos nuevos caminos conllevan riesgos (como la dependencia de protocolos DeFi o de un ecosistema concreto), señalan una fase de maduración donde la participación activa y la generación de flujos de caja sustituyen a la especulación pasiva.

Foresight NewsHace 48 min(s)

Las empresas DAT se lanzan a los 'side hustles'

Foresight NewsHace 48 min(s)

El debut de Wash: el ‘Dot Plot’ sigue ahí, pero la Fed podría haber cambiado

**Resumen en español europeo:** La Reserva Federal (Fed) mantuvo sin cambios los tipos de interés en la reunión de junio, en línea con las expectativas del mercado. La atención se centró en la primera comparecencia del nuevo presidente, Christopher W. Warsh. Aunque la llamada "gráfica de puntos" (Dot Plot) de las proyecciones de tipos se mantuvo, Warsh no presentó su propia predicción, señalando su escepticismo histórico hacia esta herramienta y una preferencia por una política más dependiente de los datos y con menos orientación futura explícita. Esto sugiere un cambio tácito en el marco de comunicación de la Fed, pasando de "explicar el futuro" a "describir el juicio actual", lo que podría reducir la certidumbre del mercado. Tras las declaraciones de Warsh enfatizando la intolerancia ante una inflación elevada, los mercados revaluaron la posibilidad de una política más restrictiva. Las expectativas de subidas de tipos repuntaron, y los índices bursátiles estadounidenses cayeron, mostrando una reducción de la aversión al riesgo. El ajuste del mercado refleja una nueva fijación de precios ante el mayor riesgo de que la Fed actúe de forma más agresiva si la inflación no retrocede rápidamente. En resumen, el debut de Warsh no cambió la política de forma inmediata, pero inició un giro en el estilo de comunicación. La pregunta clave que deja es cómo se revalorizarán los mercados cuando la Fed deje de "adelantar" su trayectoria futura.

Odaily星球日报Hace 52 min(s)

El debut de Wash: el ‘Dot Plot’ sigue ahí, pero la Fed podría haber cambiado

Odaily星球日报Hace 52 min(s)

El destino de la banca digital: por más atractiva que sea una app, no supera una licencia bancaria

Los neobancos, a pesar de atraer a cientos de millones de usuarios con cuentas gratuitas y sin comisiones, luchan por ser rentables. El 76% sigue en pérdidas, generando solo 45 dólares por usuario frente a los 350 de los bancos tradicionales. El problema radica en su modelo de negocio: dependen de las mínimas comisiones por transacciones con tarjeta, mientras que la verdadera rentabilidad bancaria proviene de los intereses crediticios. Ejemplos como Nubank en Brasil demuestran que la supervivencia depende de pivotar hacia los préstamos. Aunque su app atrae clientes, sus ingresos principales vienen de tarjetas de crédito y créditos personales. Revolut logró beneficios a través de comisiones forex, suscripciones y, cada vez más, crédito. Chime, tras años de pérdidas, solo alcanzó la rentabilidad cuando sus productos de préstamo (como anticipos de nómina) despegaron. La dependencia de infraestructuras de terceros resultó ser un riesgo fatal, como mostró la quiebra del intermediario Synapse en 2024, que dejó a millones de usuarios sin acceso a sus fondos. La lección clave es que la única defensa contra estos riesgos sistémicos es poseer una licencia bancaria propia. El sector cripto ha aprendido esta lección. Empresas como Paxos, Circle y Crypto.com están solicitando activamente licencias de fideicomiso nacional (OCC) en EE.UU. para custodiar activos y operar con autonomía reguladora. SoFi ejemplifica esta evolución: de neobanco a banco con licencia propia y ahora emisor de una stablecoin. En conclusión, la esencia de la banca —obtener beneficios mediante el crédito— permanece inalterada. Las apps innovadoras y las cuentas gratuitas son solo el cebo. Para construir un negocio financiero sostenible y resiliente, una licencia bancaria es, finalmente, indispensable.

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

El destino de la banca digital: por más atractiva que sea una app, no supera una licencia bancaria

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片