Ethereum Bulls See Opportunity in Celsius Collapse, stETH ‘De-Peg’

DefiantPublicado a 2022-06-15Actualizado a 2022-06-15

Resumen

Lido’s stETH, a derivative token representing staked ether, has traded roughly at par with Ether since its inception. That so-called “peg” broke in dramatic fashion last week, as the value of stETH relative to ETH began to plunge. Lido attributed the price fluctuation of stETH to “the Terra collapse, market-wide deleveraging and now withdrawals from larger lending platforms.”

Lido’s stETH, a derivative token representing staked ether, has traded roughly at par with Ether since its inception.

The reason was simple: each stETH token represents one staked ETH token and can be redeemed for ETH in the future, after the Ethereum network completes its transition to the proof-of-stake consensus mechanism and withdrawals on that updated network are enabled.

That so-called “peg” broke in dramatic fashion last week, as the value of stETH relative to ETH began to plunge.

stETH began trading at about 97 cents to every dollar of ETH in May. Early Friday morning, it fell to 95 cents on the dollar. On Monday morning, it was trading just above 93 cents on the dollar, according to data from Dune Analytics.

The nosedive in the value of stETH prompted Lido, the protocol that issues it, to quell fears of a broken peg and comparisons to Terra’s failed UST stablecoin.

“The exchange rate between stETH:ETH does not reflect the underlying backing of your staked ETH, but rather a fluctuating secondary market price,” Lido explained on Twitter. “The market is naturally finding a fair price for stETH as some participants need to find liquidity.”

Lido attributed the price fluctuation of stETH to “the Terra collapse, market-wide deleveraging and now withdrawals from larger lending platforms.”

Liquid Staking

Under the proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, the Ethereum network is secured by people and institutions that stake their ETH for certain periods of time. Running a single Ethereum validator node requires 32 ETH to be staked. Doing so creates a liquidity issue for participants, however: staking ETH isn’t necessarily the most lucrative way to use the cryptocurrency, while the ETH remains locked until after The Merge.

Enter Lido, a protocol that stakes ETH on users’ behalf. When someone contributes ETH to Lido’s staking pool, they receive an equivalent amount of stETH. Because it represents actual ETH, that stETH can be used in yield-bearing DeFi protocols as if it were ETH.

Withdrawal of stETH from DeFi protocols gathered steam last week, according to market observers. The Celsius Network, a company that deposits customer money in those protocols to generate returns far in excess of those available at traditional banks, allegedly made some of the largest withdrawals.

‘Luna By Proxy’

“Celsius is a HUGE holder of stETH,” Riley_gmi, a former Messari analyst, wrote. “In fact, they are the largest holder of interest bearing stETH (stETH on Aave).”

Perhaps spooked by this latest crypto winter, Celsius customers have started to pull their assets from the platform en masse. On Sunday night, Celsius announced it had frozen customer assets so that it could “honor, over time, its withdrawal obligations.”

Of Celsius’ liabilities, totaling 1M ETH, data showed only 27% was held in liquid ETH as of last week. Roughly the same amount is staked and therefore inaccessible until well after Ethereum’s transition to proof-of-stake. The remaining half is stETH.

Some analysts attributed its liquidity problems to hacks and losses during the UST collapse.

“Celsius had 500m of client deposits in Anchor so it was basically Luna by proxy,” Nic Carter tweeted.

stETH War

In an interview, crypto researcher mhonkasalo told The Defiant there was a war, of sorts, being fought over the price of stETH.

“Everyone knows Celsius has to sell, or they could be front-run by others who are trying to make it worse for Celsius,” he said. “If you think that Celsius is in trouble and they will have to sell their stETH at a discount, well, you just make that discount worse and worse so you can buy it at lower and lower [prices].”

As Celsius sells its stETH, and the price continues to drop, an interesting question opens up for Ethereum bulls.

If one assumes the proof-of-stake transition will be successful, and every stETH will be redeemable for ETH within the next year or two, people betting on Ethereum’s long-term prospects could gobble up ETH at a 5% discount on Sunday, mhonkasalo said.

But if stETH continues to fall relative to ETH — in other words, if Celsius is forced to continue to dump — they might get an even better discount.

“I’ve talked to a couple of holders [of ETH], and they’re like, there’s no need to go into this trade now, because if it goes back to peg, you just missed a trade that was a 3% [profit] trade. But if you wait and things actually get bad, you get to make an 18% trade.”

The resulting game of chicken will be interesting to watch, he added.

“ETH holders would like a discount. But so what’s a good enough discount for people to start buying?” he said. “I like all the market dynamics there. It’s basically like a war.”

Lecturas Relacionadas

94.000 millones de yuanes, la mayor financiación de este año para robots humanoides ha aparecido

La empresa de robótica humana Neura, con sede en Múnich, ha completado una ronda de financiación Serie C de 14.000 millones de dólares (unos 94.900 millones de RMB), lo que supone la mayor inversión del año en este sector. Tras la operación, su valoración alcanza los 70.000 millones de dólares. La relevancia de esta ronda radica en la participación de inversores industriales como Schaeffler y Bosch, lo que señala un cambio estratégico: el foco pasa de la demostración tecnológica a la implementación práctica en fábricas. Neura, fundada por el experto en robótica industrial Armin Zeher, ha priorizado desde el inicio la aplicabilidad en entornos de producción real, contando ya con BMW como cliente. Otros inversores como NVIDIA, Amazon y Qualcomm aportan perspectivas complementarias en infraestructura de computación, logística y tecnología. El sector de la robótica humana está experimentando una afluencia masiva de capital, impulsada por dos factores clave: los avances en modelos de IA de gran escala, que mejoran la percepción y la toma de decisiones de los robots, y la creciente presión por la escasez y el encarecimiento de la mano de obra en la manufactura global. Actualmente, las empresas siguen dos caminos principales: los robots humanoides de propósito general (como Figure AI), con un horizonte comercial a más largo plazo, y los enfocados en escenarios industriales verticales y específicos (como Neura), que ofrecen una ruta de comercialización más rápida y definida. El campo de batalla real para estos robots ya no es el laboratorio, sino el suelo de la fábrica. Los escenarios de manufactura industrial, por su entorno estructurado y tareas repetitivas, se consideran los primeros en permitir una adopción a escala. Los entornos de trabajo peligrosos también tienen un gran potencial. Sin embargo, los principales retos para la adopción masiva ya no son puramente técnicos, sino de ingeniería y modelo comercial. Destacan los elevados costes de adaptación a cada línea de producción específica y la necesidad de desarrollar sistemas de mantenimiento y servicio locales robustos para garantizar la operación continua. La entrada de gigantes industriales históricos como inversores y la presencia inicial de robots en fábricas como las de BMW marcan un punto de inflexión: la confianza del sector se consolida y la pregunta central evoluciona de "si es posible" a "cómo hacerlo mejor, más rápido y de forma más estable".

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

94.000 millones de yuanes, la mayor financiación de este año para robots humanoides ha aparecido

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片