How the Celsius Liquidity Crunch Is Linked to Lido's Staked Ethereum

DecryptPublicado a 2022-06-14Actualizado a 2022-06-14

Resumen

A core piece of Celsius's Earn strategy relies on Staked ETH not losing parity with Ethereum. But it has, and now customers want their money back.

It’s only been a month since the collapse of Terra, and the chaos that it created in the crypto market, and now Lido Finance and its Staked Ethereum (stETH) are at the center of another potential liquidity crisis.

Crypto lending company Celsius is one of Lido’s principal clients and, as such, one of the largest holders of stETH. The problem? Staked ETH is always supposed to be worth 1 ETH—and it hasn’t been for some time now.

Staked ETH represents Ethereum that’s been locked up on the Ethereum 2.0 beacon chain—a network that will soon be merged with the Ethereum mainnet in a highly anticipated upgrade that transitions the blockchain to proof of stake. Normally, users would need a minimum of 32 ETH (worth roughly $40,000) to participate in ETH 2.0 staking and earn rewards. But Lido Finance makes it possible for users to stake any amount of ETH. And because it’s “liquid staking,” it gives users stETH tokens in return.

That stETH can then be lent, staked, and traded for other tokens.

Celsius does precisely that with its own clients' funds. But now, a day after Celsius paused customer withdrawals, swaps, and transfers—”to put Celsius in a better position to honor, over time, its withdrawal obligations,” the company said—there’s growing concern over the lending company’s exposure to stETH.

The company has at least $475 million worth of stETH in a public wallet, according to blockchain research firm Nansen Research.

Celsius works by staking customer deposits, in this case Ethereum, in yield generating decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols like Lido. In return, Celsius receives stETH, which increases in value as the deposits earn rewards. Celsius makes money by paying its customers their promised rate of return, recently that’s been between 6% to 8% on ETH deposits, and keeps the rest.

The value proposition for Celsius depositors is that they are promised a fixed rate of return on their ETH and leave it to the company to figure out how to reliably generate that return.

But that strategy starts to come apart if stETH loses parity with ETH (it has) at the same time that there are a lot of Celsius depositors looking to withdraw their ETH (they are) because Celsius doesn’t appear to have enough liquid ETH to meet all of its obligations.

By Monday afternoon, stETH had yet to pull even with Ethereum. At the time of this writing, stETH was trading at 0.94 ETH. stETH has been trading below 1 ETH since last month, when stETH was impacted by the TerraUSD and Luna collapse.

A large public Celsius wallet shows $475 million worth of stETH being used as collateral for hundreds of millions in stablecoin loans.

“They have also sent thousands of stETH to FTX in recent days, presumably to sell,” Andrew Thurman, content lead at Nansen, told Decrypt, “though we can't verify that because it's off-chain. They have likely been especially hard-hit by stETH losing its peg to ETH.”

But selling large quantities of stETH to get more liquid ETH would cause its price to drop even more, which would further compound the liquidity crunch that Celsius is already facing.

There have been efforts to find the other public wallets, and therefore account for the rest of Celsius’s $10 billion in customer assets, but so far only about $1.5 billion appear to have been accounted for, according to research from The Block. That doesn’t mean Celsius doesn’t have that ETH, but it has still caused a panic.

“Celsius has likely failed to isolate risk: they might have taken USDC and held it in UST (Luna's stablecoin), or taken ETH and held it in stETH,” Jack Niewold, founder of crypto newsletter Crypto Pragmatist, wrote in a Twitter thread. “So, when ALL of crypto drops and ALL users want their funds back, ALL Celsius users feel the pinch.”

Celsius did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s requests for comment.

If all the hand wringing over stETH feels familiar, it’s because it also played a role in the collapse of Terra’s UST and LUNA tokens. At the time, the stETH to ETH imbalance was the opposite of what it is today.

Last month, there was a run on stETH because users were rushing to pull their funds out of the Anchor lending protocol on the Terra blockchain, which back then offered users up to 20% returns on their UST deposits. After Terraform Labs shut down the Terra network twice, users cashed out their stETH, pushing the price up.

One ETH could be exchanged for 1.0248 stETH through the Curve protocol, meaning it was trading at a 3% discount relative to Ethereum.

When that happened, it created an opportunity for arbitrage trades. Investors were able to sell stETH for more ETH than had been deposited to create it, which created a big drawdown on Lido’s ETH pool.

Each time there’s a big liquidity crunch, Brian Norton, COO of My Ethereum Wallet, told Decrypt, it makes DeFi feel a lot like traditional finance because it leaves a centralized platform in control of people’s ability to access their funds.

“Every time you see this, every time this just reinforces the point that if you're relying exclusively on these sort of centralized platforms,” he said, referring to Celsius, “even when the yields are great, I think you're still giving up a good deal of control.”

Last week, the Celsius team went to great lengths to assure customers that it could meet its obligations.

“Celsius has the reserves (and more than enough ETH) to meet obligations, as dictated by our comprehensive liquidity risk management framework” the company wrote in a blog post, following rumors that it had been heavily impacted by the Terra crash.

The post ended with a somewhat chilling quote from U.S. Navy Admiral David Farragut, who led an attack on New Orleans during the Civil War: “Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.”

Lecturas Relacionadas

94.000 millones de yuanes, la mayor financiación de este año para robots humanoides ha aparecido

La empresa de robótica humana Neura, con sede en Múnich, ha completado una ronda de financiación Serie C de 14.000 millones de dólares (unos 94.900 millones de RMB), lo que supone la mayor inversión del año en este sector. Tras la operación, su valoración alcanza los 70.000 millones de dólares. La relevancia de esta ronda radica en la participación de inversores industriales como Schaeffler y Bosch, lo que señala un cambio estratégico: el foco pasa de la demostración tecnológica a la implementación práctica en fábricas. Neura, fundada por el experto en robótica industrial Armin Zeher, ha priorizado desde el inicio la aplicabilidad en entornos de producción real, contando ya con BMW como cliente. Otros inversores como NVIDIA, Amazon y Qualcomm aportan perspectivas complementarias en infraestructura de computación, logística y tecnología. El sector de la robótica humana está experimentando una afluencia masiva de capital, impulsada por dos factores clave: los avances en modelos de IA de gran escala, que mejoran la percepción y la toma de decisiones de los robots, y la creciente presión por la escasez y el encarecimiento de la mano de obra en la manufactura global. Actualmente, las empresas siguen dos caminos principales: los robots humanoides de propósito general (como Figure AI), con un horizonte comercial a más largo plazo, y los enfocados en escenarios industriales verticales y específicos (como Neura), que ofrecen una ruta de comercialización más rápida y definida. El campo de batalla real para estos robots ya no es el laboratorio, sino el suelo de la fábrica. Los escenarios de manufactura industrial, por su entorno estructurado y tareas repetitivas, se consideran los primeros en permitir una adopción a escala. Los entornos de trabajo peligrosos también tienen un gran potencial. Sin embargo, los principales retos para la adopción masiva ya no son puramente técnicos, sino de ingeniería y modelo comercial. Destacan los elevados costes de adaptación a cada línea de producción específica y la necesidad de desarrollar sistemas de mantenimiento y servicio locales robustos para garantizar la operación continua. La entrada de gigantes industriales históricos como inversores y la presencia inicial de robots en fábricas como las de BMW marcan un punto de inflexión: la confianza del sector se consolida y la pregunta central evoluciona de "si es posible" a "cómo hacerlo mejor, más rápido y de forma más estable".

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

94.000 millones de yuanes, la mayor financiación de este año para robots humanoides ha aparecido

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片