Rumors of Bybit Buying Korbit Spark Buzz in Crypto Community

TheCryptoTimesPublished on 2025-11-10Last updated on 2025-11-10

Key Highlights

Reports are circulating that global crypto exchange Bybit may be pursuing the acquisition of Korbit, South Korea’s fourth-largest cryptocurrency exchange.

According to a post by Wu Blockchain on X, citing South Korea’s Maeil Business Newspaper, Bybit has reportedly met with Korbit’s management to begin discussions regarding the potential acquisition. 

Korbit is currently 60.5% owned by NXC, Nexon’s holding company, and 31.5% owned by SK Planet. Bybit is said to be considering acquiring SK Planet’s stake first before potentially moving toward full ownership.

Local media coverage

Maeil Business Newspaper reported that the discussions between Bybit and Korbit are still in the early stages. The newspaper noted that while the deal is not yet confirmed, industry insiders consider Bybit’s interest in Korbit a logical step given the exchange’s global expansion efforts.

The report also pointed to South Korea’s regulatory environment. In October 2025, South Korea’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), under the Financial Services Commission (FSC), approved Binance’s request to change the executives at GOPAX. 

Binance had originally applied for this back in March 2023, so the approval came more than two years later. Analysts quoted by the newspaper said the approval could encourage other foreign cryptocurrency exchanges to enter the Korean market through mergers or acquisitions.

Ownership and market context

Korbit is mostly owned by NXC, which holds a 60.5% stake, while SK Planet owns 31.5%. Reports suggest that SK Planet has been pulling back from its investments in cryptocurrency, which could make its stake available for sale.

South Korea is the world’s second-largest market for cryptocurrency trading after the United States. If foreign exchanges like Bybit enter the market, it could change the local crypto industry, especially since domestic banks and financial institutions are restricted from participating in cryptocurrency businesses.

Community reaction

The potential acquisition has generated discussion in the crypto community. One user commented: “Bybit buying Korbit? Interesting. NXC and SK Planet ownership suggests they weren’t fully committed to the crypto game. Question is, are they getting a bargain or a headache?”

Another user stated: “Smart move if they’re serious about tightening their Asia footprint.”

Wu Blockchain noted Bybit’s rapid growth since its founding in 2018, describing it as “the world’s second-largest virtual asset exchange” and highlighting its convenient futures trading platform as a driver of its expansion.

Bybit’s official statement

Despite circulating reports, Bybit has not officially confirmed or denied the acquisition. Wu Blockchain reported that Bybit “responded that it is unaware of the market rumors regarding the acquisition of Korbit and advised users to refer to its official website for future updates.” However, no such statement can be found on Bybit’s website or its X account, leaving the news unverified.

At present, the potential acquisition remains speculative. Observers are monitoring developments closely, as any confirmed deal could have significant implications for the South Korean virtual asset market.

Also Read: Monad’s Airdrop Expectations Buzz Within the Crypto Community


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

Related Reads

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

"Token Repurchase and Burn: An Empty Promise? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity" Holding company stock grants shareholders residual claim rights - a legally enforceable entitlement to remaining assets after all other obligations are paid. This comes with rights like voting, dividends, and a share in sale proceeds. Crypto protocols have long promised token holders similar benefits: governance participation and a share of future growth. However, this narrative is fundamentally flawed and built on voluntary promises, not enforceable legal rights. The core difference is that token holders lack any legally enforceable claim to a protocol's underlying value or revenues. Common mechanisms like using protocol revenue to buy back and burn tokens are purely discretionary; the team can alter or stop the policy at any time. Token holders have no legal recourse. This rights gap becomes critically apparent when protocols introduce traditional equity alongside tokens, as seen with Venice AI's $65M funding round. Equity investors hold legal contracts with rights to company assets and profits, while token holders' benefits depend entirely on the continued goodwill of the protocol's management. The acquisition of Houdini Swap, where equity holders were paid while token holders received nothing, starkly illustrates this disparity. Upcoming legislation like the CLARITY Act threatens to eliminate the regulatory gray area that has allowed this ambiguous "pseudo-equity" narrative. The Act would classify tokens as either digital commodities (regulated by CFTC) or investment contract assets/securities (regulated by SEC). Protocols aiming for the "digital commodity" classification would be explicitly prohibited from granting token holders any legal claim to corporate revenue, profits, or assets. Promising that tokens will appreciate from protocol profits would likely classify them as securities. Projects like Aave are attempting technical solutions, such as its automated, on-chain "Aavenomics 3.0" buyback mechanism. However, this remains code that the governance body could still vote to change, not an immutable legal contract. The industry faces a clear fork: either acknowledge tokens as digital commodities and stop promising economic rights tied to corporate profits, or formally register tokens as securities and bear the associated compliance burden. The decade-long narrative equating tokens with ownership is built on unenforceable promises. The entry of traditional equity investors with real legal rights exposes this foundational weakness, which may unravel with the next major funding deal.

Foresight News2h ago

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

Foresight News2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片