You Should Still Believe in Crypto

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-13Last updated on 2025-12-13

Abstract

The article "You Should Still Believe in Crypto" addresses the growing sense of burnout and disillusionment within the cryptocurrency industry, sparked by a post from Aevo co-founder Ken Chan titled "I Wasted 8 Years of My Life in Crypto." It acknowledges the collective fatigue many feel due to the industry's fast-paced, often speculative nature, where narratives shift rapidly, and projects frequently fail or disappear. However, the piece argues that the core value of crypto remains vital. It references Nic Carter’s response, highlighting crypto’s potential to create a more robust monetary system, encode business logic via smart contracts, establish true digital property rights, improve capital market efficiency, and enhance global financial inclusion. The article revisits Bitcoin’s origin as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system born from the 2008 financial crisis, emphasizing its purpose as a trustless, decentralized alternative to traditional finance. It points to real-world adoption in high-inflation countries like Argentina and Turkey, where Bitcoin and stablecoins serve as essential financial tools, and notes increasing institutional embrace from firms like BlackRock and Fidelity. Finally, it draws a parallel to the early internet era, arguing that despite chaos, failed projects, and speculative excess, the crypto industry—like the internet—is laying foundational groundwork for future technological and financial evolution. The conclusion is a call to persevere,...

Author: BlockBeats

If you've been in the crypto industry for the past few years, you must have felt that growing sense of "burnout."

Last weekend, the lengthy post by Aevo co-founder Ken Chan undoubtedly struck a chord with many. He used an extreme title—"I Wasted 8 Years of My Life in the Crypto Industry."

This isn't just one person's state; it's the collective exhaustion of the industry. Ken wrote the truth many dare not admit: in the crypto industry, it's really easy to lose your sense of time.

It's Not All Unfounded

You might have stayed up late for airdrops, watched the charts for listings, chased narratives by buying high and selling low, researched a new protocol all night, or participated in countless hours of unpaid labor for community governance. From romantic libertarianism, to on-chain autonomy experiments, to today's runaway frenzy of memes, perpetuals, and gambling-themed tracks—all of this is enough to make one wonder: are we really participating in a technological revolution, or are we just working for an infinitely greedy casino?

Practitioners' doubts are not because they are not steadfast enough, but because of the crypto industry's own brutal structure: narrative life cycles are shorter than product life cycles; hype outweighs fundamentals; speculation moves far faster than building; hero worship coexists with collective suspicion; the end for many projects is not failure, but disappearance.

We must be honest: Ken's feelings are something many have experienced. And these doubts are not unfounded.

The weight of the question, "What are we really坚持ing for?" might be far heavier than "Will the price of Bitcoin go up?"

So when we say "we believe in crypto," what exactly are we believing in? Are we believing in project teams? No. Are we believing in some celebrity KOL? Of course not. Are we believing in一个个 narratives? That's even less likely.

Many suddenly realize: the one thing they have truly believed in all along likely boils down to this: what we are still坚持ing and believing in is the meaning of crypto for this world.

Therefore, shortly after Ken's article went viral, Nic Carter, co-founder of Castle Island Ventures, wrote another response article—"I Don't Regret Spending Eight Years in Crypto."

What is the meaning of crypto for this world? Nic Carter gave his five points: making the monetary system sounder, encoding business logic with smart contracts, making digital property rights real, improving capital market efficiency, and expanding global financial inclusion.

Don't Forget Why We Started

Whenever the industry falls into chaos, perhaps we can reread the Bitcoin whitepaper.

A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System—that's the first sentence of the whitepaper.

2008, financial crisis, banks failing, Lehman Brothers collapsing. Financiers and politicians made the whole world pay for their risks and mistakes.

Bitcoin was born not to create wealth, but to answer a question: "Can we build a monetary system that does not rely on any centralized institution?"

For the first time in history, humanity possessed a currency that required trust in no one. It is the world's only truly不属于 any country, company, or individual's financial system. You can criticize ETH, criticize Solana, criticize all L2s, criticize all DEXs, but few criticize Bitcoin, because its original intention has never changed.

Any Web2 company can close your account tomorrow; but no one can stop you from sending a Bitcoin tomorrow. There will always be people who dislike it, distrust it, even attack it, but no one can change it.

Water does not contend, yet it benefits all things.

Global inflation normalization, soaring sovereign debt, asset scarcity after long-term declining risk-free rates, financial repression, lack of privacy... The existence of these problems means the vision of the crypto industry is not outdated but more urgent. As Nic Carter said: "I have never seen a technology that can push capital market infrastructure upgrades more than crypto."

Why This Is Not a Failed Industry

Ken said he wasted eight years. But did we really waste our青春?

In countries with hyperinflation like Argentina, Turkey, and Venezuela, BTC and stablecoins have become the de facto "shadow financial system"; hundreds of millions of people unable to access the banking system have owned global digital assets for the first time; humanity possesses a globally accessible asset it can truly control for the first time; international payments no longer need banks for the first time; billions of people can access the same financial system for the first time; financial infrastructure begins to脱离 national borders; an asset not reliant on violence and power begins to be recognized globally...

For a country with high inflation, a stable, non-depreciating currency is like a Noah's Ark, which is why stablecoins account for 61.8% of crypto trading volume in Argentina. For freelancers with overseas business, digital nomads, and the wealthy class, USDT is their digital dollar.

Compared to hiding dollars under the mattress or risking black market currency exchange, clicking a mouse to convert pesos into USDT seems more elegant and safe.

Whether it's cash transaction by a street vendor or a USDT transfer by the elite, it is essentially a distrust of national credit and a protection of private property. In a country with high taxes, low welfare, and constantly depreciating currency, every "grey transaction" is a反抗 against institutional plunder.

For a hundred years, the Rose Palace in Buenos Aires has changed hands batch after batch, and the peso has been废弃了一张又一张. But the common people, relying on underground transactions and grey wisdom, have硬是 found a way out in a dead end.

Almost all of the world's top 20 funds have established Web3 departments; TradFi institutions continue to pour in (BlackRock, Fidelity, CME); national digital currency systems use Bitcoin as a reference; digital asset ETFs across the US are刷新 new records for capital inflows; in just 15 years, Bitcoin has jumped into the top ten global assets...

Even with bubbles, speculation, chaos, and scams, some facts have already occurred. These changes have somewhat tangibly changed the world. And we are standing in an industry that will continue to change the global financial structure.

Have We Really Left Nothing Behind?

Many will still ask: "If 15 years from now, all these chains are gone, projects are gone, protocols are replaced by more advanced infrastructure. Then what we are doing now, isn't it still wasting our青春?"

Look at another industry: the 2000 internet bubble burst, NASDAQ plummeted 78%; in 1995 Amazon was called "a website selling books"; in 1998 Google was considered "not as good as Yahoo"; in 2006 social networks were seen as "teenage rebellion."

The early internet was full of: thousands of dead startups; completely vanished innovations;大量 investments lost; tens of thousands of people thought they had wasted their青春.

Early BBS, portals, dial-up internet, paid email—almost none exist today, 90% of the first-generation mobile internet products did not survive. But they were by no means a "waste"; they constituted the soil for the mobile era.

The infrastructure they created: browsers, TCP/IP, early servers, compilers,它们成就了: Facebook, Google, Apple, the entire foundation of mobile internet, cloud computing, and AI. The history of social networks is a constantly破碎 cycle, just as TikTok today is built upon countless dead social networks.

Each generation replaces the previous one, but no generation is in vain.

No industry's journey is clean, linear, clear, correct, or has clear answers. All foundational tech industries experience chaos, bubbles, trial and error, misunderstanding, until they change the world.

The crypto industry is the same.

The technological revolution of the crypto industry has never been accomplished by a single generation. Everything we do, even if ETH is replaced by other chains in the future, L2s are rewritten by new architectures, the DEXs we use today all disappear, will absolutely not be in vain.

Because we provide the foundational soil, the trial and error, the parameters, the social experiments, the path dependence, the experience and samples absorbed by the future. Not the final outcome itself.

Moreover, you are not alone in坚持ing.

Around the world, there are still millions of developers, researchers, fund managers, node operators, builders, and traders pushing this era slowly forward. We are with you.

——Written for those who remain on this path.

Related Questions

QWhat is the core reason for the author's belief in the crypto industry despite widespread fatigue and skepticism?

AThe author believes in the fundamental value and transformative potential of crypto for the world, such as creating a more robust monetary system, enabling smart contracts for business logic, making digital property rights real, improving capital market efficiency, and expanding global financial inclusion, rather than in specific projects, influencers, or narratives.

QAccording to the article, what was the original purpose of Bitcoin's creation as stated in its whitepaper?

ABitcoin was created to establish a peer-to-peer electronic cash system that does not rely on any centralized institutions, in response to the 2008 financial crisis, aiming to answer the question: 'Can we build a monetary system that does not depend on any centralized institution?'

QHow does the article argue that the crypto industry has already made a tangible impact on the global financial system?

AThe article points out that crypto has become a 'shadow financial system' in high-inflation countries like Argentina and Turkey, provided billions of unbanked people with access to global digital assets, enabled international payments without banks, and attracted major traditional financial institutions like BlackRock and Fidelity, with Bitcoin now ranking among the top ten global financial assets.

QWhat comparison does the article draw between the crypto industry and the early internet era?

AThe article compares the crypto industry to the early internet era, noting that both experienced chaos, bubbles, failed projects, and skepticism, but early internet's 'waste'—like BBS, portals, and dial-up—formed the foundational soil for future advancements like Facebook, Google, and AI, suggesting that crypto's current experiments and failures are similarly paving the way for future financial infrastructure.

QWhy does the author assert that efforts in the crypto industry are not in vain, even if current technologies and projects become obsolete?

AThe author argues that the crypto industry's contributions provide foundational soil, experimentation, parameters, social experiments, and path dependencies that will be absorbed as experience and samples for future advancements, meaning that even if current chains, protocols, or DEXs disappear, they are not wasted but part of a necessary iterative process in technological revolution.

Related Reads

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

In just 11 days, Bun's founder Jarred Sumner used Anthropic's Claude AI models to rewrite its million lines of code from Zig to Rust. This move sparked significant controversy, particularly from Zig's creator, Andrew Kelley, who publicly criticized Sumner's engineering practices and the decision to use AI for such a massive rewrite. Bun, a high-performance JavaScript/TypeScript runtime and rival to Node.js, was originally written in Zig. After Anthropic acquired Bun, the team encountered persistent stability and memory safety bugs in the Zig codebase. These issues, combined with Zig's strict policy against LLM-generated code, led to the decision to rewrite in Rust. The rewrite was executed using Claude AI tools at an estimated API cost of $165,000, dramatically reducing the expected time and financial cost. Andrew Kelley's response was scathing. He blamed the original bugs on poor engineering habits, calling Bun's Zig code a collection of "hacks on top of hacks." He expressed relief that Bun was no longer associated with Zig, fearing it would misrepresent the language and attract low-quality, AI-generated contributions. The tech community is divided; some view Kelley's critique as unprofessional, while others see it as a defense of engineering integrity. A major concern about the AI-driven rewrite is the resulting code quality. The translation from Zig left approximately 27,000 lines of unsafe Rust code, raising fears about long-term maintainability and technical debt. The debate centers on whether this project is a milestone in AI-assisted development or a future maintenance nightmare.

marsbit35m ago

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

marsbit35m ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin and Now AI: Cango's "What Not to Do" Strategy Cango, a Chinese auto finance platform that went public on the NYSE in 2018, is undergoing its third major transformation. After selling its entire auto business in 2024, it pivoted to become a large-scale Bitcoin miner, acquiring 50 exahash of mining rigs from Bitmain. However, its true goal was never Bitcoin, but owning and controlling energy infrastructure. Now, Cango is pivoting again. While most listed Bitcoin miners are leasing power to giant hyperscalers for AI training clusters, Cango is taking the opposite path. It has launched an AI inference subsidiary called EcoHash, focusing not on training but on distributed inference. The company's strategy hinges on the insight that over 70% of mining industry power is controlled by small, independent sites (10-50 MW), which are too small for hyperscalers but ideal for low-latency AI inference. Cango aims to partner with these small operators, providing the AI technology, customers, and financing through its EcoLink software layer, which can distribute workloads across sites for reliability. Cango maintains a hybrid model, running roughly 31.7 EH/s of Bitcoin mining for cash flow while aggressively cleaning its balance sheet—slashing long-term debt by 94.5% to $30.6 million and raising $75 million for its AI venture. Its first AI deployment will be at a 50 MW site in Georgia. The strategy faces skepticism, given the high costs of converting mining sites and the potential for an AI bubble. However, Cango's leadership believes discipline around "what not to do"—avoiding direct competition with hyperscalers in training—positions it to capture the long-tail demand for distributed AI inference power.

Foresight News51m ago

From Auto Finance to Bitcoin to AI Engines: An Analysis of Cango's 'What Not to Do' Strategy

Foresight News51m ago

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

The article discusses how MicroStrategy's potential Bitcoin sales go far beyond the announced $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." It clarifies a key distinction in the company's "BTC Monetization Program": selling Bitcoin to *build* a new dollar reserve (the $1.25B cap) versus selling to *replenish* the existing USD Reserve after it's used for expenses like preferred share dividends. The recent $216M BTC sale for dividend payments was a "replenishment," leaving the headline $1.25B building quota untouched. The plan actually outlines three potential funding pools from BTC sales: 1) Building the reserve ($1.25B cap), 2) Covering preferred share/ debt costs (no specified cap), and 3) Funding buyback programs (up to $20B). This means the structured sales potential exceeds $30 billion, not including uncapped replenishment sales. The piece argues this marks MicroStrategy's shift from a passive "buy-and-hold" Bitcoin proxy to an actively managed entity using BTC as a balance-sheet tool to manage its complex capital structure (common stock, preferred shares, debt, reserve). This creates new dynamics and potential conflicts, as actions benefiting one part (e.g., selling BTC to pay dividends) may pressure another (e.g., undermining the "never sell" narrative). Investors must now parse the company's specific terminology ("build" vs. "replenish") to understand the true scope of future BTC sales, which is significantly larger than the market initially perceived.

marsbit58m ago

Strategy's Bitcoin Sales Cap Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion: A Detail the Market Overlooked

marsbit58m ago

Goldman Sachs Report Deconstructs the Competitive Landscape of China's AI Large Models: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winner?

Goldman Sachs analyzes China's AI large language model (LLM) landscape, identifying key players and a strategic shift towards efficiency and global expansion. The report highlights that Chinese open-source/open-weight models are closing the performance gap with top global proprietary models at significantly lower cost, driven by architectural innovations like MoE. This enables a "two-tier" market: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with pricing at ~$1 per million tokens, and a low-end, price-sensitive global segment. Open-source strategies aid adoption but limit monetization, as deployments via third-party platforms (e.g., AWS Bedrock, Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue for model creators. The industry is thus moving towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing to improve unit economics. Internationally, the focus is shifting from "token maximization" to ROI-driven enterprise adoption, particularly in non-U.S. markets. Major cloud platforms are integrating Chinese models (e.g., DeepSeek, MiniMax). Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman Sachs identifies **Zhipu AI** and **DeepSeek** as leaders in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** (with Seedance) leading in multimodal/video generation. **MiniMax** and **Kuaishou** are also rated favorably. The firm forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue growing from ~RMB 35bn (2026E) to RMB 879bn by 2030.

marsbit58m ago

Goldman Sachs Report Deconstructs the Competitive Landscape of China's AI Large Models: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winner?

marsbit58m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片