XRP ETFs See Goldman Sachs Emerge As Top Institutional Holder

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-11Last updated on 2026-03-11

Abstract

Goldman Sachs was the largest disclosed institutional holder of spot XRP ETFs as of December 31, 2025, with $153.8 million in exposure. Despite a sharp post-launch price decline, XRP ETFs attracted $1.4 billion in cumulative inflows, demonstrating notable resilience. Data shows these ETFs are heavily driven by retail demand, with only 15.9% of assets under management tied to institutional 13F filings—significantly lower than Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana ETFs. Other major disclosed holders include Millennium Management, Citadel Advisors, and Jain Global. At the time of reporting, XRP traded at $1.38.

Goldman Sachs was the largest disclosed institutional holder of spot XRP ETFs as of Dec. 31, 2025, according to Bloomberg Intelligence data shared by ETF analyst James Seyffart, offering one of the clearest snapshots yet of who was buying into the products during their first months on the market.

The filing data also underscores a more surprising point: XRP ETF demand appears to have stayed intact even as the token suffered a sharp post-launch decline. “The XRP ETFs have actually held up pretty well despite the massive pullback in price,” Seyffart wrote on X. “They’ve taken in a cumulative $1.4 billion since launch.”

That resilience matters because the products were launched into a difficult tape rather than a clean risk-on stretch. A Bloomberg Intelligence chart shared by Seyffart showed cumulative XRP ETF flows rising from about $150 million on Nov. 13, 2025, to $1.44 billion by March 4, 2026, with the steepest increase coming in the weeks after mid-November.

XRP ETF flow data | Source: X @JSeyff

Who Is Buying The Spot XRP ETFs?

Who exactly was behind those flows is harder to pin down. As Seyffart noted, “We only know a small portion of them because the vast majority don’t file 13Fs. But here are the holders as of 12/31/2025.” That caveat is important. 13F disclosures only capture a slice of the market, meaning the list reflects disclosed institutional positioning rather than the full ownership base.

Still, the disclosed holders offer a revealing hierarchy. Goldman Sachs topped the list with $153.8 million of XRP ETF exposure, equal to 83.6 million XRP. Millennium Management followed at $23.1 million, or 12.5 million XRP. Logan Stone Capital, Citadel Advisors and Jain Global rounded out the upper tier, each with positions between roughly $4 million and $5.3 million. Other disclosed holders included Marex Group, Jane Street, DRW Securities, Flow Traders, Wedbush Securities and several registered advisory firms.

Institutional XRP ETF holders | Source: X @JSeyff

The broader ownership mix, however, suggests XRP ETFs were not primarily an institutional story in the way some other spot crypto products have been. Bloomberg Intelligence’s cross-asset comparison showed XRP ETFs with 83 disclosed 13F holders and $1.342 billion in assets under management, but only 15.9% of that AUM was tied to 13F filings. That stands in sharp contrast to Solana ETFs, where 48.8% of AUM came from 13F filers, and even to Bitcoin and Ethereum at 24.1% and 27.2%, respectively.

13F Ownership for spot crypto ETFs | Source: X @JSeyff

Seyffart made the point directly, saying the four spot crypto ETF groups show different buyer profiles and that “SOL & XRP are by far the newest but XRP ETFs are heavily driven by retail demand.”

Eric Balchunas, Seyffart’s colleague at Bloomberg Intelligence, framed the flow picture in behavioral terms. “Like Solana this is really impressive given these launched into a brutal 45% drawdown,” he wrote. “Traditionally, inflows are near imposs for ETF having a reverse shiny object moment, and esp if they are brand new. My guess is this is largely XRP super fans vs casual retail.”

That interpretation fits the numbers. XRP ETFs had slightly more disclosed 13F holders than Solana ETFs, 83 versus 85, but a far smaller institutional share of assets. In other words, institutions showed up, and Goldman showed up in size, but the backbone of the flow story appears to have been retail conviction rather than traditional allocators building large disclosed positions.

At press time, XRP traded at $1.38.

XRP remains below the 200-week EMA, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com

Related Questions

QWhich institution was the largest disclosed holder of spot XRP ETFs as of December 31, 2025, and what was the value of their holdings?

AGoldman Sachs was the largest disclosed institutional holder with $153.8 million of XRP ETF exposure.

QDespite a sharp price decline after launch, how much cumulative inflow did XRP ETFs gather according to James Seyffart?

AXRP ETFs took in a cumulative $1.4 billion since launch despite the price pullback.

QWhat percentage of XRP ETF's Assets Under Management (AUM) was tied to 13F filers, and how does this compare to Solana ETFs?

AOnly 15.9% of XRP ETF's AUM was tied to 13F filers, which is significantly lower than Solana ETFs at 48.8%.

QAccording to the article, what type of investor demand primarily drove the flows into XRP ETFs?

AXRP ETF flows were heavily driven by retail demand and XRP super fans, rather than traditional institutional allocators.

QWhat was the price of XRP at the time the article was published?

AAt press time, XRP traded at $1.38.

Related Reads

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbit8m ago

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbit8m ago

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbit2h ago

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is XRP 2.0

XRP 2.0: A New Frontier in the Cryptocurrency Landscape Introduction to XRP 2.0 In the ever-evolving realm of cryptocurrency, new projects continuously emerge, vying for attention and adoption. One such promising initiative is XRP 2.0, a novel cryptocurrency project designed to leverage advanced blockchain technology and robust encryption methodologies. While the name draws parallels with Ripple’s XRP, it’s crucial to note that XRP 2.0 operates independently, focusing on enhancing transaction security, privacy, and scalability. As the digital financial landscape increasingly embraces decentralized solutions, XRP 2.0 aims to contribute meaningfully to web3 and the overall expansion of crypto projects. What is XRP 2.0? At its core, XRP 2.0 is a cryptocurrency project that aims to create a secure and decentralized digital currency ecosystem. Its foundational technology integrates sophisticated blockchain principles with cutting-edge encryption techniques. The overarching goal of XRP 2.0 is to establish itself as a reliable and efficient platform enabling swift transaction execution while prioritizing enhanced privacy protections for its users. The project is promoted as a solution to many limitations faced by existing cryptocurrencies, proposing a system that can handle a higher volume of transactions with improved speed and privacy. This versatility positions XRP 2.0 as a significant contender in a marketplace riddled with various digital currencies. Who is the Creator of XRP 2.0? The identity of the creator behind XRP 2.0 has been flagged as ‘Wilbur.’ However, comprehensive details regarding Wilbur or their associated entity remain elusive. The anonymity of many cryptocurrency creators is not an uncommon phenomenon in the industry, often designed to maintain a degree of privacy and security. Who are the Investors of XRP 2.0? As of now, specific information related to the investment foundations or organizations supporting XRP 2.0 is not publicly available. In the cryptocurrency sector, the backing by reputed investors can significantly influence a project's credibility and success, yet the transparency regarding the financial supporters of XRP 2.0 has not been established. How Does XRP 2.0 Work? XRP 2.0 stands out by employing a combination of blockchain technology and advanced encryption algorithms that ensures secure and decentralized transactions. Its innovative structure includes unique features designed to foster user engagement and broaden functionalities beyond conventional cryptocurrency transactions. Among these features, XRP 2.0 incorporates AI-powered capabilities, such as text-to-image and text-to-speech functionalities. These additions are designed to enhance the interactive experience for users, promoting broader applicability across various sectors. By bridging technological advancements with user-centered design, XRP 2.0 aims to capture the attention of a diverse range of individuals and enterprises looking to integrate cryptocurrency solutions into their operational frameworks. Timeline of XRP 2.0 Understanding XRP 2.0 requires examining the milestones that have defined its journey thus far: July 23, 2023: XRP 2.0 is introduced as a novel cryptocurrency project, aiming to revolutionize secure and decentralized transaction capabilities in the blockchain domain. September 8, 2023: The launching of another project, XRP20, occurs, marking the emergence of an ERC-20 token on the Ethereum blockchain that remains unrelated to XRP 2.0. November 13, 2023: The XRP Ledger undergoes a significant update with the release of rippled server software version 2.0.0. It is essential to note that this development is disconnected from the XRP 2.0 cryptocurrency project. Key Points About XRP 2.0 To distill the essence of XRP 2.0, several critical factors emerge: Unique Features: The inclusion of features like AI-powered text-to-image and text-to-speech further diversifies the potential applications of XRP 2.0. Blockchain Technology: The framework utilizes advanced blockchain mechanisms and encryption protocols, ensuring a secure and decentralized environment for transactions. Scalability and Privacy: XRP 2.0 prioritizes enhanced privacy protections in transaction processes and the scalability necessary to accommodate a growing user base. No Affiliation with Ripple: Importantly, despite its name, XRP 2.0 does not have any allegiance or collaboration with Ripple’s XRP, distinguishing its operational framework and objectives within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Conclusion XRP 2.0 represents an ambitious venture into the cryptocurrency sphere, aiming to offer a combination of security, privacy, and efficiency in digital transactions. By integrating sophisticated technologies and user-friendly features, the project sets out to broaden the horizons of what cryptocurrency can achieve in today's digital economy. While the anonymity of its creator and lack of disclosed investors might raise questions for some, XRP 2.0's focus on advanced functionalities and decentralisation enhances its appeal amidst an increasingly crowded crypto market. As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, XRP 2.0 may yet emerge as a pivotal player in the expansion of secure and scalable blockchain solutions.

941 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.01Updated 2024.12.03

What is XRP 2.0

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of XRP (XRP) are presented below.

活动图片