Why Could Coinbase Halt the CLARITY Act Voting Agenda with a Single Statement?

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-20Last updated on 2026-01-20

Abstract

This article details how Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's public opposition led to the abrupt postponement of a key U.S. Senate committee vote on the proposed "Clarity Act," a comprehensive cryptocurrency regulation bill. Armstrong argued the current draft would be worse than the existing regulatory framework, specifically objecting to provisions that could ban interest payments on stablecoins and grant excessive authority to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The event underscores Coinbase's significant and growing political influence in Washington, D.C., amplified by the pro-crypto stance of the Trump administration. The company has invested heavily in political action committees (PACs) to support crypto-friendly lawmakers. The article contrasts the current environment with the previous Biden administration, under which the SEC sued Coinbase. The Trump administration has since dropped that lawsuit, and the industry is pushing for legislation to cement a favorable regulatory landscape. The delayed vote highlights the intense lobbying battle between the crypto industry, which seeks lighter regulation, and traditional banking interests advocating for stricter rules, particularly on stablecoin offerings that compete with bank deposits. Negotiations are ongoing.

Editor's Note: The Clarity Act, which was about to enter a critical vote, was urgently halted due to public opposition from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong. The contentious issues revolve around restrictions on stablecoin interest payments and the boundaries of the SEC's authority. In fact, with the shift in regulatory direction following Trump's administration, the crypto industry has gradually transformed from being "the regulated" to "rule negotiators." This intervention not only altered the voting process but also exposed the real power struggles behind crypto legislation.

Original text:

After months of negotiations, a significant cryptocurrency bill was originally scheduled to enter a committee vote in the Senate on Thursday, a crucial step in the legislative process.

But then, the top executive of the largest U.S. crypto company spoke out on social media. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong wrote on X on Wednesday evening: "Unfortunately, Coinbase cannot support the bill in its current text. This version would be significantly worse than the current regulatory state. We would rather have no bill than a bad bill."

Hours later, the Senate vote was canceled.

Typically, the outcome of a controversial legislative vote depends on a few key moderate lawmakers caught in partisan tug-of-war. But the shift in this milestone crypto bill this week highlights the immense influence Coinbase now wields in Washington—especially as the crypto industry's status rapidly rises under President Trump's administration.

Over the past few months, congressional staff have been advancing the drafting of the Clarity Act. This nearly 300-page bill aims to establish a regulatory framework for almost all key aspects of the crypto industry, with many rules shaped by industry participation and advocacy. However, at the last minute, Armstrong objected to a proposed wording, arguing that it could risk banning one of Coinbase's products; he also stated that the bill would grant excessive power to the U.S.'s top financial regulator, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Coinbase's decisive move is backed by years of the company building political influence in Washington. As a publicly traded company with a market cap nearing $70 billion, Coinbase funds a network of political action committees (PACs) that have invested over $130 million in the 2024 congressional elections to support the election of more pro-crypto lawmakers.

This wave of intensive political spending sends an unmistakable message to Congress: anyone who opposes the crypto industry could become a target.

Now, leading companies in the industry have enough leverage to push for their interests. Todd Phillips, a financial expert at Georgia State University, said: "Coinbase played this move very well." A Coinbase spokesperson declined to comment.

Founded in 2012, Coinbase provides users with a platform to buy, sell, and store cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Anyone can log into its app and complete a purchase with a few clicks.

But not long ago, the company faced a much tougher environment in Washington. In 2023, the SEC sued Coinbase, accusing it of operating as an "unregistered exchange," part of the Biden administration's broader crackdown on the crypto industry. Armstrong, as a co-founder of Coinbase, criticized the SEC at the time for adopting a "regulation by enforcement" approach and called for clearer crypto regulatory rules.

The election of President Trump in 2024 completely changed the landscape. Shortly before taking office, Trump and his sons launched a crypto business, and Trump publicly declared that he would make the U.S. the "crypto capital of the world."

Within weeks of Trump taking office, the SEC dropped lawsuits against Coinbase and other crypto companies. Subsequently, the crypto industry pushed for legislation to codify this regulatory "rollback," preventing future administrations from restarting harsh crackdowns on the industry.

In July of this year, with government support, the House passed its version of the Clarity Act, largely adopting the crypto industry's vision for a new regulatory system. The bill would make it easier for crypto companies like Coinbase to argue that digital currencies are not securities, thus avoiding federal securities regulations designed to protect investors and markets.

But the bill encountered resistance in the Senate. Last fall, Senate Democrats proposed strict regulations for decentralized finance (DeFi), a branch of the crypto领域, sparking strong opposition from the industry.

At the same time, banking lobby groups pushed for provisions in the bill to prohibit crypto trading platforms like Coinbase from paying interest to holders of stablecoins. Stablecoins are a type of digital currency designed to maintain a price of $1. The banking industry argues that such "interest-bearing products" offered by crypto platforms would undermine banking business by competing with traditional deposit accounts.

This issue quickly became a key concern for Coinbase. A ban on interest payments could affect one of its revenue streams. Kara Calvert, Coinbase's head of policy, said: "Offering these incentive programs is crucial for competition."

The latest draft of the Clarity Act in the Senate was released near midnight on Monday. Congressional staff and crypto industry executives immediately intensified their review of the text, aiming to complete it before the scheduled Senate committee meeting on Thursday. This meeting, known as a "markup," is when senators have the opportunity to propose amendments. As the markup approached, while other crypto executives continued to express support for the bill on social media, Armstrong announced he would withdraw his support.

On Wednesday evening, South Carolina Republican Senator Tim Scott, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, announced that the markup would be postponed, with no new date set yet. In a statement, he said: "All parties continue to communicate in good faith. Our goal is to establish clear 'rules of the road' that protect consumers, strengthen national security, and ensure the future of finance is built in the United States."

Related Questions

QWhy was the vote on the Clarity Act in the Senate postponed?

AThe vote was postponed after Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong publicly opposed the current version of the bill on social media, stating it would be worse than the current regulatory state and that Coinbase would prefer no bill over a bad one.

QWhat were Coinbase's main objections to the Clarity Act?

ACoinbase objected to a proposed provision that could potentially prohibit one of its products (likely interest payments on stablecoins) and argued that the bill would grant the SEC excessive regulatory power.

QHow has the political landscape for crypto companies like Coinbase changed with the Trump administration?

AThe political landscape shifted significantly. The SEC dropped lawsuits against Coinbase and other crypto companies, and the industry gained substantial influence, moving from being regulated to actively negotiating rules, with the administration pledging to make the U.S. a 'global crypto hub'.

QWhat role did banking lobbyists play in shaping the Clarity Act?

ABanking lobbyists pushed for provisions in the bill to ban crypto trading platforms from paying interest on stablecoin holdings, arguing that these interest-bearing products compete with traditional bank deposit accounts.

QHow has Coinbase built its political influence in Washington?

ACoinbase built its influence over years by funding a network of Political Action Committees (PACs) that spent over $130 million in the 2024 election cycle to support the election of pro-crypto lawmakers, sending a clear message to Congress.

Related Reads

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit10m ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit10m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片