When Tether No Longer Clings to the Dollar...

比推Published on 2025-12-09Last updated on 2025-12-09

Abstract

Tether, the issuer of the world's largest stablecoin USDT, is shifting its reserve strategy in anticipation of lower interest rates. While its business model thrived during high-rate periods—earning billions from U.S. Treasury holdings—future Fed rate cuts could reduce its interest income significantly. To adapt, Tether has diversified into gold (over 100 tons) and Bitcoin (over 90,000 BTC), which together make up 12-13% of its reserves. These assets historically perform well in low-rate, high-liquidity environments, potentially offsetting lost Treasury yield. However, rating agencies like S&P have expressed concern, downgrading Tether’s stability rating due to increased exposure to volatile assets like Bitcoin and reduced transparency. The key challenge remains maintaining USDT’s dollar peg while navigating this new macroeconomic phase.

Author: Prathik Desai

Original Title: Gold, Bills, Thrills

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


When I think of stablecoins, I often see them merely as a bridge between the US dollar and the blockchain, nothing more. They can be powerful infrastructure components, silently supporting the operation of on-chain products in ways that are often easily overlooked.

As a business model, stablecoin issuers have direct revenue, which is tied to the interest rates published by the US Federal Reserve. The higher the interest rates, the more income the US Treasury bonds backing their stablecoin circulation bring to the issuers.

However, in recent years, the world's largest stablecoin issuer by circulation has adjusted its reserve strategy to better adapt to the macroeconomic environment.

In this quantitative analysis, I will explore why and how Tether (Tether) is partially replacing its massive interest-earning engine with gold and Bitcoin to cope with the upcoming shift in the interest rate cycle.

Let's begin.

The US Treasury Machine

A glance at Tether's US Treasury reserves reveals how it became a profit machine during periods of high interest rates.

Over the past few years, USDT holders earned 0%, while Tether earned about 5% on approximately $1 trillion in US Treasury bonds.

Even with average interest rates relatively low for most of 2025, around 4.25%, as of September 30, 2025, Tether reported a net profit of over $10 billion for the year. In contrast, the second-largest stablecoin issuer, Circle, reported a net loss of $202 million for the same period.

For most of the past three years, Tether's business model perfectly aligned with the macroeconomic backdrop. The Federal Reserve maintained interest rates between 4.5% and 5.5%, and Tether held over $1 trillion in US bonds, with each percentage point of yield bringing in approximately $1 billion in annual revenue.

While most cryptocurrency companies struggled with operational losses, Tether accumulated tens of billions in surplus simply by going long on short-term government debt.

But what happens when the interest rate cycle turns, and rate cuts are expected in the coming years?

The Interest Rate Cycle Problem

CME FedWatch data shows that by December 2026, there is over a 75% probability that the federal funds rate will drop from the current 3.75-4% range to between 2.75-3% and 3.25-3.50%. This is already a significant drop from the 5% level that Tether relied on for profits in 2024.

Lower interest rates could compress the interest income Tether earns from its US Treasury holdings.

A one-percentage-point drop in overall US economic liquidity could reduce Tether's annual income by at least $15 billion. This exceeds 10% of its annualized net profit for 2025.

So, how will Tether protect its profitability in this world? After Jerome Powell's term ends in 2026, a new Fed Chair is more likely to follow the expectations of US President Donald Trump for more significant and faster rate cuts.

It is at this point that Tether's reserve strategy diverges most significantly from any other stablecoin issuer.

Diversification Strategy

Between September 2021 and October 2022, Tether reduced its reliance on commercial paper (unsecured short-term debt instruments issued by large corporations) by over 99%. From over $30 billion in September 2021, it was cut to almost zero.

It replaced these assets with US-backed Treasury bonds to increase transparency for investors.

During the same period, Tether's US Treasury reserves grew from less than $25 billion to $40 billion.

Between Q3 2023 and Q3 2025, the composition of Tether's reserve assets changed, incorporating asset classes rarely seen on the balance sheets of other stablecoin issuers.

As of September 2025, Tether had accumulated approximately over 100 tons of gold, valued at around $13 billion. It also held over 90,000 BTC, worth nearly $10 billion. Together, these account for about 12-13% of its reserves.

In contrast, its competitor Circle held only 74 Bitcoin, worth about $8 million.

Why the Shift Now?

The increase in gold and Bitcoin allocations coincided with the period when the forward rate curve no longer predicted rate hikes.

In response to rising inflation, interest rates jumped from less than 1% to over 5% between May 2022 and August 2023. During this time, maximizing income by investing in US Treasuries made economic sense. But once interest rates peaked in 2023 and no further hikes were expected, Tether saw it as the right moment to start preparing for the turn in the interest rate cycle.

Why Choose Gold and Bitcoin When Yields Fall?

Gold tends to perform well when US Treasury yields fall. This is driven by expectations of rising inflation and the reduced opportunity cost of holding gold instead of low-yielding US Treasuries.

We saw this happen this year; when the Fed cut rates by 50 basis points, gold prices rose over 30% between August and November.

Even during the COVID-19 pandemic, when the Fed cut rates by 1.5 percentage points to inject liquidity into the economy, gold prices rose 40% in the subsequent five months.

Bitcoin has recently exhibited similar macro behavior. As monetary policy eases and liquidity expands, Bitcoin typically reacts like a high-beta asset.

Therefore, while a high-interest-rate environment allows for income through US Treasuries, allocating to Bitcoin and gold can provide potential upside in a low-interest-rate environment.

This allows Tether to book unrealized gains and even realize some profits by selling gold or Bitcoin from its vault, particularly during phases when interest rates are low and income is squeezed.

However, not everyone approves of the increased exposure to gold and Bitcoin on Tether's balance sheet.

The Peg Problem

Although US Treasuries still account for 63% of Tether's reserves, the increased exposure to riskier assets like Bitcoin and unsecured loans has raised concerns among rating agencies.

Two weeks ago, S&P Global Ratings reassessed Tether's ability to maintain the USDT peg to the US dollar from Tier 4 (Constrained) to Tier 5 (Weak). It noted the increased exposure to corporate bonds, precious metals, Bitcoin, and secured loans in its reserves.

The agency pointed out that these assets account for almost 24% of the total reserves. More troubling for the agency is that, although US Treasuries still back most of the reserves, the USDT issuer provides limited transparency and disclosure regarding the composition of these riskier asset classes.

Furthermore, there are concerns about undermining the peg of the USDT token to the US dollar.

S&P stated in its report: "Bitcoin now accounts for about 5.6% of USDT's circulation, exceeding the 3.9% over-collateralization margin, indicating that the reserves can no longer fully absorb the impact of its value decline. Therefore, a decline in Bitcoin's value combined with a decline in the value of other high-risk assets could reduce reserve coverage and lead to USDT being undercollateralized."

On one hand, Tether's shift in reserve strategy seems a reasonable measure to cope with the upcoming low-interest-rate environment. When rate cuts come—and they will—this $13 billion profit engine will struggle to sustain itself. The upside potential of the held gold and Bitcoin could help offset some of the income loss.

On the other hand, this shift has also rightly made rating agencies nervous. The primary task of a stablecoin issuer is to protect its peg to the underlying currency (in this case, the US dollar). Everything else, including the revenue it generates, its reserve diversification strategy, and the unrealized gains it can obtain, becomes secondary. If the peg fails, the business collapses.

When circulating tokens are backed by volatile assets, the risk profile of the peg changes. A sufficiently large impairment of Bitcoin—which we have been experiencing over the past two months—would not necessarily break the USDT peg but would narrow the buffer between the two.

Tether's story will unfold with the upcoming monetary policy easing. This week's rate cut decision will be the first indicator to measure this stablecoin giant's ability to defend its peg and signal its future trajectory.

Let's wait and see.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original article link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594373

Related Questions

QWhy has Tether started diversifying its reserves to include assets like gold and Bitcoin?

ATether is diversifying its reserves to prepare for the upcoming shift in the interest rate cycle. As the Federal Reserve is expected to lower interest rates, the yield on U.S. Treasuries will decrease, compressing Tether's interest income. Gold and Bitcoin have historically performed well in low-rate environments, offering potential upside to offset this income loss.

QWhat is the current composition of Tether's reserves, and how does it differ from its competitor Circle?

AAs of September 2025, Tether's reserves consist of approximately 63% U.S. Treasuries, over 100 tons of gold (worth ~$13B), and over 90,000 BTC (worth ~$10B). In contrast, its competitor Circle holds only 74 Bitcoin, worth $8 million, showing a vastly different and more conservative strategy.

QWhat concerns have rating agencies like S&P Global raised about Tether's new reserve strategy?

AS&P Global Ratings downgraded its assessment of Tether's ability to maintain the USDT peg from 'constrained' to 'weak.' The agency is concerned about the increased exposure to higher-risk asset classes like corporate bonds, precious metals, Bitcoin, and secured loans, which now make up nearly 24% of its reserves. It also cited limited transparency and the risk that a drop in Bitcoin's value could reduce reserve coverage and lead to USDT being undercollateralized.

QHow did Tether's business model perform during the period of high interest rates?

ADuring the high-interest-rate period, Tether's business model was extremely profitable. It held over $1 trillion in U.S. Treasuries and earned a yield of around 5%. Even with lower average rates of about 4.25% for much of 2025, Tether reported a net profit exceeding $10 billion for the first nine months of the year, far outperforming competitors like Circle, which reported a net loss.

QHow do gold and Bitcoin typically behave in a low interest rate environment, and why is this beneficial for Tether?

AGold tends to perform well when U.S. Treasury yields fall, as it is driven by expectations of rising inflation and a lower opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. Bitcoin often acts as a high-beta asset, reacting positively to expansionary monetary policy and increased liquidity. This potential for price appreciation allows Tether to book unrealized gains or realize profits by selling these assets, helping to offset the squeezed income from lower-yielding Treasuries.

Related Reads

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit1h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit1h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbit1h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片