Weekly Token Unlocks: BGB Unlocks Tokens Worth Approximately $510 Million

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-25Last updated on 2026-01-25

Abstract

This week's major token unlocks feature significant releases from several projects, led by Bitget Token (BGB). A total of 140 million BGB tokens (Bitget Exchange's official token), valued at approximately $510 million, are scheduled for unlock. Additionally, EigenLayer will unlock 36.82 million tokens (worth ~$12.33 million). This protocol, built on Ethereum, introduces restaking, a new primitive in cryptoeconomic security that allows staked ETH to secure other applications on its network. Humanity Protocol has two separate unlocks: 105 million tokens (~$17.48 million) and 88.91 million tokens (~$11.38 million). The project is an anti-Sybil blockchain network providing a unique human identity verification mechanism, giving users full ownership of their data and identity. Release curves for each token unlock are provided in the accompanying charts.

Bitget Token

Project Twitter: https://x.com/bitget

Project Website: /

This Unlock Amount: 140 million tokens

This Unlock Value: Approximately $510 million

Official token of the Bitget exchange.

Specific release curve is as follows:

EigenLayer

Project Twitter: https://x.com/eigenlayer

Project Website: https://www.eigenlayer.xyz/

This Unlock Amount: 36.82 million tokens

This Unlock Value: Approximately $12.33 million

EigenLayer is a protocol built on Ethereum that introduces the concept of restaking, a new primitive in cryptoeconomic security. This primitive allows for the restaking of ETH at the consensus layer. Users who stake ETH can opt into EigenLayer smart contracts to restake their ETH and extend cryptoeconomic security to other applications on the network.

Specific release curve is as follows:

Humanity

Project Twitter: https://x.com/Humanityprot/

Project Website: https://www.humanity.org/

This Unlock Amount: 105 million tokens

This Unlock Value: Approximately $17.48 million

Humanity Protocol is a Sybil-resistant blockchain network that provides developers with a unique human identity verification mechanism and gives users complete ownership of their data and identity.

Specific release curve is as follows:

Humanity

Project Twitter: https://x.com/Humanityprot/

Project Website: https://www.humanity.org/

This Unlock Amount: 88.91 million tokens

This Unlock Value: Approximately $11.38 million

Humanity Protocol is a Sybil-resistant blockchain network that provides developers with a unique human identity verification mechanism and gives users complete ownership of their data and identity.

Specific release curve is as follows:

Related Questions

QWhat is the total value of BGB tokens being unlocked this week?

AApproximately $510 million worth of BGB tokens are being unlocked this week.

QHow many EIGEN tokens are scheduled for unlock from EigenLayer this week?

A36.82 million EIGEN tokens are scheduled for unlock.

QWhat is the primary function of the EigenLayer protocol?

AEigenLayer is a protocol built on Ethereum that introduces restaking, a new primitive in cryptoeconomic security, allowing staked ETH to be restaked to extend cryptoeconomic security to other applications on the network.

QWhat is the core purpose of Humanity Protocol?

AHumanity Protocol is an anti-Sybil blockchain network that provides developers with a unique human identity verification mechanism and gives users complete ownership of their data and identity.

QWhat is the combined total number of HUMANITY tokens being unlocked across the two unlocks mentioned?

AThe combined total is 194.91 million HUMANITY tokens (105 million + 88.91 million).

Related Reads

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

When launching a crypto payment business, obtaining the necessary licenses is the crucial first step. However, the second, and arguably more critical, step is designing a comprehensive operational framework that forms a coherent business loop. This loop must be clearly understood and executable by all stakeholders: banks, payment partners, exchanges, on-chain analytics providers, regulators, and your internal team. Many projects mistakenly believe a single license permits all operations. Licenses merely grant entry; they don't define how the specific business functions. The real challenge lies in detailing every aspect of the workflow. This involves clarifying the customer base, the flow of fiat and crypto assets, the settlement process, and establishing clear lines of responsibility for risks like AML compliance, sanctions screening, chargebacks, and regulatory inquiries. A robust framework must answer seven core questions: Who are the clients and merchants? Who collects fiat and crypto? Who handles conversion and custody? And who is ultimately accountable for compliance and risk management? Projects often fail not from a lack of licensing, but during due diligence when they cannot convincingly explain these operational details. Therefore, beyond securing licenses, the priority must be constructing a closed-loop system. This system ensures the business model is transparent, risks are managed, responsibilities are delineated, contracts are aligned, and the entire process is comprehensible to partners and regulators. The true competitive edge in crypto payments lies not in acquiring a license quickly, but in integrating licensing, banking, compliance, and operations into a sustainable and executable whole.

marsbit22m ago

When Doing Cryptocurrency Payment, the First Thing is Licenses, What is the Second?

marsbit22m ago

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Arthur Hayes argues that the current AI market is a bubble poised to burst, which will exert downward pressure on the crypto market in the near term. The core trigger is rising oil prices due to the US-Iran conflict and a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. Higher energy costs directly increase the operational expenses of AI data centers, squeezing profit margins for companies like Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI. Hayes predicts that persistent inflation from high oil prices will force Trump, in a bid to win the November election, to turn public sentiment against the AI industry. He may propose regulations and taxes on data centers and AI companies to appeal to voters concerned about costs and job displacement. Such political rhetoric could shatter market confidence. Furthermore, the market is unlikely to healthily absorb the massive concurrent IPOs of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, which together seek valuations in the trillions. The combination of soaring energy costs, overwhelming equity supply, and negative political pressure will puncture the AI bubble. Hayes notes that nearly all new USD liquidity since 2022 has flowed into AI, leaving crypto like Bitcoin behind. When the AI bubble bursts, liquidity will contract sharply, pulling down all risk assets, including cryptocurrencies. In response, Hayes's fund, Maelstrom, has sold all AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. It maintains core positions in Bitcoin and Ethereum while increasing exposure to energy sector equities, betting on rising oil and gas prices. He expects Bitcoin to bottom after the AI-led market decline, before rallying again with future monetary easing.

Foresight News36m ago

Arthur Hayes Analysis: AI Bubble Nears Burst, Crypto Market Faces Short-Term Pressure

Foresight News36m ago

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

After To C and To B, the Next Wave is To A: Serving AI Agents In a recent quarterly earnings call, Meituan's Wang Xing introduced a new concept: To A (To Agent), signifying that future business services will increasingly target AI Agents as primary clients, not just consumers or merchants. This shift implies that internet giants must now consider how to make their services more appealing for AI Agents to recommend, fundamentally altering traditional distribution logic. This "To A era" is prompting an unusual trend of alliances among major tech companies. Unlike previous competitive battles, firms like Meituan, Tencent, JD.com, Huawei, OPPO, and OpenAI are rapidly forming partnerships. The reason is strategic: as AI Agents become the primary user interface, handling tasks from a single command (e.g., "Book a Japanese restaurant for tomorrow"), the risk for platforms is being bypassed entirely. Companies are positioning themselves within this new value chain. Three primary strategies are emerging: 1. **Super-Entry Points + Service Providers:** Platforms like Tencent's Yuanbao, WeChat, and ChatGPT aim to be the first-stop Agent, integrating various services (food delivery, shopping, travel) from partners like Meituan and JD.com. 2. **Apps as Callable Services:** Companies like Meituan, JD.com, and Uber are ensuring their core services remain accessible and callable by external Agents, shifting from front-end apps to back-end capabilities. 3. **System-Level Agent Entry Points:** Smartphone makers (Huawei, Honor, OPPO) are leveraging their OS-level AI assistants to control the initial user command, redistributing it to relevant service apps. While alliances offer mutual benefit—entry points gain service capabilities, and service providers gain traffic—inherent conflicts of interest exist. A dominant Agent platform could eventually attempt to connect directly with suppliers (restaurants, hotels), bypassing current aggregators like Meituan or Ctrip. Other unresolved challenges include the potential for Agent recommendations to become a new form of paid ranking and unclear accountability for faulty recommendations. The current rush to form alliances is a defensive move by service providers to secure their position before the landscape solidifies. In this To A-driven restructuring, the greatest risk is not losing the race but failing to hear the starting gun.

marsbit45m ago

To C, To B, and the Next Big Thing Called To A

marsbit45m ago

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

As humanoid robots become increasingly lifelike, they confront a significant psychological barrier known as the "Uncanny Valley Effect," a concept proposed by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. This phenomenon describes a dip in human comfort and acceptance when robots appear almost, but not perfectly, human. Minor imperfections in facial expressions, eye movements, or skin texture trigger a subconscious sense of unease, as the brain detects something trying, yet failing, to mimic a person. Examples range from the controversial human-like robot Sophia to animated characters in films like *The Polar Express*. The effect poses a key design challenge for robotics companies. Some, like Boston Dynamics, avoid it entirely by creating highly capable but visibly mechanical robots. Others, like Hanson Robotics, push for greater human likeness despite the risk. For consumer robots, especially in homes, most manufacturers opt for stylized or clearly mechanical designs to ensure broader acceptance. While the Uncanny Valley remains a powerful force, its impact may diminish over time through technological advancements that achieve near-perfect realism or through generational familiarity as people grow accustomed to interacting with humanoid machines. Ultimately, navigating this psychological frontier requires as much understanding of human perception as of robotics technology itself.

marsbit45m ago

The More Lifelike the Robot, the More Terrifying? Unveiling the 'Uncanny Valley Effect' in the Era of Humanoid Robots

marsbit45m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片