U.S. Treasury moves forward with GENIUS Act – New rules protect stablecoin issuers

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-09Last updated on 2026-04-09

Abstract

The U.S. Treasury, through FinCEN and OFAC, has proposed a new rule under the GENIUS Act (signed into law in July 2025) that treats permitted payment stablecoin issuers similarly to banks under the Bank Secrecy Act. This aims to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and sanctions evasion by imposing anti-money laundering obligations on issuers. The rule is designed to protect national security without hindering innovation in the payment system. This action follows multiple cases of illicit stablecoin use, including seizures of millions of dollars linked to scams and criminal activities. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated the proposal strengthens U.S. leadership in digital finance while safeguarding the financial system.

As the crypto market braces for the passage of the CLARITY Act, a new rule under the GENIUS Act has come to the limelight.

In a joint proposal, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) brought a rule that treats payment stablecoin issuers similarly to banks.

Source: www.fincen.gov

This was in the context of money laundering, terrorist financing, and sanction evasion.

For perspective, this proposed rule is part of the GENIUS Act, which was signed into law by U.S. President Donald Trump in July 2025.

What prompted the Treasury to come up with such a proposal?

Regulators believe payment stablecoin issuers can evolve the payment system in the U.S. However, given the scale and size of the financial system of the country, illicit actors find it easy to “jeopardize U.S. national security.”

Therefore, to combat such illicit financial risks, the rule ensures that permitted payment stablecoin issuers (PPSIs) are treated like financial institutions for purposes of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).

Needless to say, this would automatically impose the anti-money laundering (AML) obligations, which were earlier just for BSA.

Additionally, the proposal is also designed to be “fit for purpose, assist law enforcement, and minimize unnecessary burden.” That being said, all this is a part of the broader plan to “modernize BSA requirements” with consistent efforts from FinCEN.

Treasury Scott Bessent weighs in

Applauding such changes made under the U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noted,

President Trump is strengthening American leadership in digital financial technology.

He further added,

This proposal will protect the U.S. financial system from national security threats without hindering American companies’ ability to forge ahead in the payment stablecoin ecosystem.

Illicit activities that targeted stablecoin in 2025 and before

This comes as the stablecoins had already been a center of target for many years. For instance, in June 2025, U.S. federal authorities seized $225.3 million worth of Tether’s USDT linked to the aforementioned scams.

Additionally, in July 2025, approximately $2 million worth of digital assets was unsealed by the DOJ, linked to a Palestine-based money exchange business. In November 2024, too, $5.5 million in stablecoins were seized from a drug trafficking operation.

Chainalysis’s recent report further confirmed these metrics, highlighting how in 2025 stablecoins accounted for “84% of all illicit transaction volume.”

Source: Chainalysis

Final Summary

  • The joint efforts to bring in a proposed rule to address illicit activities in the stablecoin market underline the importance of the GENIUS Act passed in July 2025.
  • With millions being seized and confiscated by the DOJ, this was an alarming rule that should be passed for better crypto innovation in the U.S.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the new rule proposed under the GENIUS Act?

AThe new rule treats payment stablecoin issuers similarly to banks for purposes of the Bank Secrecy Act, imposing anti-money laundering obligations to combat illicit financial risks like money laundering, terrorist financing, and sanction evasion.

QWhich U.S. government agencies jointly proposed the new rule for stablecoin issuers?

AThe Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) jointly proposed the rule.

QAccording to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, how will this proposal benefit the U.S. financial system?

AScott Bessent stated that the proposal will protect the U.S. financial system from national security threats without hindering American companies' ability to innovate in the payment stablecoin ecosystem.

QWhat percentage of illicit transaction volume did stablecoins account for in 2025 according to Chainalysis?

AStablecoins accounted for 84% of all illicit transaction volume in 2025 according to Chainalysis's report.

QWhen was the GENIUS Act signed into law and by whom?

AThe GENIUS Act was signed into law by U.S. President Donald Trump in July 2025.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit29m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit29m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit40m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit40m ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片