U.S. proposal to ease 401(k) rules could open door to crypto-linked investments

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-31Last updated on 2026-03-31

Abstract

A new U.S. Department of Labor proposal aims to ease rules for 401(k) plans, potentially allowing greater inclusion of alternative assets like cryptocurrencies. The guidance clarifies fiduciary responsibilities under ERISA, emphasizing that investment decisions should be judged based on process rather than performance outcomes. This creates a "safe harbor" to reduce legal risks for plan managers who conduct thorough and objective analyses. While crypto is not explicitly mentioned, the framework could apply to digital asset investments as institutional products expand. The shift may encourage gradual diversification into non-traditional assets, reducing long-standing legal barriers and enabling broader access to alternative investments in retirement portfolios.

A new proposal from the U.S. Department of Labor could make it easier for retirement plans to include alternative assets. This shift may eventually extend to crypto-linked exposure.

The rule, published by the Employee Benefits Security Administration, clarifies how fiduciaries should approach investment decisions under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act [ERISA]. It introduces a “safe harbor” framework designed to reduce legal risk.

At its core, the proposal signals a broader policy shift: retirement plan managers may have greater flexibility to include non-traditional assets, provided they follow a documented, prudent decision-making process.

Legal clarity aims to unlock broader asset access

Under current rules, fiduciaries overseeing 401(k) plans must meet strict standards when selecting investment options. This often discourages exposure to complex or volatile assets, like crypto, due to litigation risk.

The new proposal emphasizes that fiduciary responsibility should be judged based on process rather than performance. If plan managers conduct a thorough and objective analysis of an investment, they may be shielded from liability even if outcomes fall short.

The Department of Labor said the goal is to reduce barriers that limit diversification and prevent workers from accessing higher risk-adjusted returns through their retirement accounts.

Alternative assets move closer to retirement portfolios

The proposal explicitly covers asset allocation funds that include alternative investments such as private equity and other non-traditional assets.

While crypto is not explicitly referenced, the framework could apply to funds with digital asset exposure, particularly as institutional products tied to cryptocurrencies continue to expand.

The document reinforces that ERISA does not impose categorical restrictions on specific asset classes. Instead, fiduciaries are expected to weigh risks, returns, liquidity, and diversification when constructing investment menus.

A shift toward flexibility over restriction

The proposal builds on decades of guidance emphasizing that fiduciary prudence is a process-based standard, not a judgment based on hindsight performance.

It also affirms that plan managers retain broad discretion to select investments, including those that may be more complex, as long as decisions are supported by appropriate analysis and expertise.

This approach marks a departure from more conservative interpretations that have historically limited the inclusion of alternative assets in retirement plans.

Institutional implications could unfold gradually

If finalized, the rule could reshape how retirement capital is allocated over time.

Rather than triggering immediate changes, the proposal is more likely to encourage a gradual shift, as plan providers reassess their investment offerings and risk frameworks.

The inclusion of alternative assets in 401(k) plans has long been constrained by legal uncertainty. By addressing that uncertainty, the Department of Labor may be laying the groundwork for broader institutional participation across a wider range of asset classes.


Final Summary

  • The proposal introduces legal clarity and a safe harbor that could make it easier for 401(k) plans to include alternative assets.
  • While crypto is not explicitly mentioned, the shift could open the door to digital asset exposure within retirement portfolios over time.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the new proposal from the U.S. Department of Labor regarding 401(k) plans?

AThe main purpose is to make it easier for retirement plans to include alternative assets by providing legal clarity and a 'safe harbor' framework that reduces litigation risk for fiduciaries who follow a prudent decision-making process.

QHow does the proposal change the way fiduciary responsibility is judged under ERISA?

AThe proposal emphasizes that fiduciary responsibility should be judged based on the process of investment decision-making rather than on the performance outcomes. If plan managers conduct a thorough and objective analysis, they may be shielded from liability even if the investment results are poor.

QDoes the proposal explicitly mention cryptocurrencies as an allowable investment?

ANo, the proposal does not explicitly mention cryptocurrencies. However, the framework could apply to funds with digital asset exposure as it does not impose categorical restrictions on specific asset classes.

QWhat potential long-term effect could this rule have on retirement portfolios if finalized?

AIf finalized, the rule could gradually reshape retirement capital allocation by encouraging plan providers to include a broader range of alternative assets, such as private equity and potentially crypto-linked investments, leading to greater diversification and access to higher risk-adjusted returns.

QWhat key factor has historically limited the inclusion of alternative assets in 401(k) plans according to the article?

ALegal uncertainty and the strict fiduciary standards that created high litigation risk have historically discouraged and limited the inclusion of complex or volatile alternative assets in 401(k) plans.

Related Reads

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

DeepSeek has updated its DeepSeek V4 model with the DSpark speculative decoding framework, achieving a significant 60-85% speedup in generation for Flash models and 57-78% for Pro models while maintaining the same overall throughput. This engineering-focused update, rather than a core architectural change, introduces DSpark to address latency and throughput bottlenecks in high-concurrency production environments. DSpark combines high-throughput parallel generation with adaptive load-aware verification. Its key innovations include a semi-autoregressive generation architecture to model dependencies within token blocks and a hardware-aware confidence-scheduled verification system. This system uses a confidence head to predict token acceptance probabilities, allowing it to dynamically optimize verification length per request and allocate compute only to tokens with the highest expected payoff. The asynchronous scheduler is designed for real-world deployment, ensuring zero-overhead scheduling and continuous CUDA graph replay while preserving the target model's output distribution. In tests across mathematical reasoning, code generation, and daily dialogue, DSpark outperformed state-of-the-art models like Eagle3 and DFlash, increasing average acceptance length by 26.7%-30.9% and 16.3%-18.4% respectively on Qwen3 target models. DeepSeek also open-sourced DeepSpec, a full-stack codebase for training and evaluating speculative decoding draft models, providing a standardized toolkit that includes data preparation tools, model implementations, training code, and evaluation scripts.

marsbit1h ago

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

marsbit1h ago

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

The Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing its most complex structural adjustment since inception. Despite Bitcoin's price holding near $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching a record 1 ZH/s, miner profitability is deteriorating. The industry is operating close to its breakeven point, with the 2028 halving expected to accelerate consolidation. The challenges extend beyond the halving's subsidy reduction; the industry's revenue model has yet to successfully transition towards a fee-driven structure. Increasingly, mining companies are evolving from simple Bitcoin producers into infrastructure and energy operators, including providers of AI/HPC computing power. Competition is shifting from pure hash rate expansion to business model upgrades. Economic pressure is evident. The theoretical daily mining revenue at current prices is around $78 million, yet the actual figure is only about $33 million—a 136% gap. Transaction fees remain low at roughly $220k daily, far below historical implied levels. With a current estimated industry-wide breakeven price near $65,000, mining alone is struggling to generate ideal profits. The 2028 halving is projected to push the fundamental production cost floor to approximately $93,289. This will likely accelerate a shift towards consolidation among larger, well-capitalized miners with diversified revenue streams. Competitive advantage will belong to institutionalized players with access to low-cost energy, AI/HPC hosting operations, and stronger balance sheets. In essence, Bitcoin mining is transitioning from a "mining business" to an "infrastructure business." Future profitability and resilience will depend less on block rewards and more on diversified income sources like energy management and computational infrastructure services. For investors, the key question is not the halving itself, but which miners can successfully navigate this business model transformation.

marsbit2h ago

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

marsbit2h ago

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

Andrej Karpathy, a prominent figure in AI, has reportedly joined Anthropic, leading to a noticeable decrease in his open-source contributions and social media activity. A document claiming to be his personal "CLAUDE.md" file—a set of instructions for the Claude AI to follow within a specific codebase—has been circulating online. While its authenticity is unverified, the content aligns closely with Karpathy's publicly shared principles on effective AI-assisted programming. The document outlines key rules for AI coding assistants, emphasizing the importance of reading existing code thoroughly before writing new code to maintain consistency. It advises against over-engineering, advocating for simple, surgical modifications that match the project's existing style. Other guidelines include clarifying assumptions upfront, writing meaningful tests, thoughtful debugging, and carefully considering dependencies. The core message is that these principles help prevent common AI coding failures, such as introducing unnecessary abstractions, style drift, or making invisible architectural decisions. The community has noted that even experts like Karpathy require detailed instructions to guide AI effectively, akin to managing a junior developer. A related GitHub repository, "andrej-karpathy-skills," which encapsulates these ideas, is reported to significantly reduce Claude's code error rate. Ultimately, the advice stresses that the best CLAUDE.md is tailored to one's own tech stack and coding practices.

marsbit2h ago

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片