US Market Structure Bill Delayed and Deferred Again — Is a 2026 Passage Possible?

ccn.comPublished on 2026-01-22Last updated on 2026-01-22

Abstract

The US crypto market structure bill, which aims to provide regulatory clarity, has faced another delay in the Senate as of January 2026. Key factors include Coinbase withdrawing support, citing concerns over stablecoin yield bans and expanded SEC authority. Competing legislative priorities, partisan disagreements, and the upcoming midterm elections further complicate its passage. A competing version from the Senate Agriculture Committee may advance, but the overall timeline remains uncertain. While 2026 passage is still possible, analysts estimate a 50–60% chance, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC.

Key Takeaways

  • Senate consideration of the crypto market structure bill stalled again in January 2026 after Coinbase withdrew its support.
  • A competing version from the Senate Agriculture Committee could move forward soon, with a potential hearing as early as Jan. 27.
  • Passage in 2026 remains possible, but midterm elections and unresolved regulatory disputes make the outcome increasingly uncertain.

Crypto’s long-awaited path to regulatory clarity in the U.S. just hit another roadblock .

After months of negotiations, industry lobbying, and bipartisan signaling, momentum around Washington’s flagship crypto market structure bill is once again slowing.

Behind the scenes, shifting political priorities, growing industry pushback, and committee-level maneuvering are reshaping the bill’s timeline—raising fresh questions about whether 2026 will finally deliver the rules the crypto sector has been waiting for.

Try Our Recommended Crypto Exchanges
Sponsored
Disclosure
We sometimes use affiliate links in our content, when clicking on those we might receive a commission at no extra cost to you. By using this website you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy.
"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitget<\/h3>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitget

promotions
New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="67adf8d4f12aaec7e4808bf5" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693291aa4a5bcb62319448b2" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> New user rewards up to 6,200 USDT.
Coins
88
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
Bitunix<\/h3>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

Bitunix

promotions
Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="6899b9831836d97539c51aa6" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693293fa4a5bcb6231949c97" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Receive up to $100,000 worth of exclusive gifts for newcomers upon registration.
Coins
151
Claim Offer
"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">
BTCC<\/h3>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">

BTCC

promotions
Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.<\/strong>"}' data-trk="68f8c175c334f42ea614a1a4" href="https://links.ccn.com/links?code=693294144a5bcb623194a054" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> Get up to 10,055 USDT when you register, verify, and make the first deposit and the first trades.
Coins
162
Claim Offer
Explore All Offers

Another Delay?

The U.S. crypto market structure bill cleared the House in mid-2025, but momentum has repeatedly stalled in the Senate.

Lawmakers released an updated draft earlier this month and scheduled a new meeting for Jan. 27, raising hopes of progress after weeks of uncertainty.

Those hopes remain fragile. Industry pushback, partisan negotiations, and shifting legislative priorities have repeatedly delayed the bill.

As of January 2026, Senate markups have been postponed again, with consideration now likely pushed to late February or March.

Competing priorities—particularly housing affordability legislation tied to President Trump’s agenda—have taken precedence.

A floor vote may not occur until after the Jan. 30 deadline for a stopgap government funding bill, further complicating the timeline.

The bill also faces structural hurdles. It requires approval from multiple committees, and negotiations between Republicans and Democrats remain tense.

Republicans have pushed for lighter oversight under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), while Democrats have emphasized stronger consumer protections.

Lawmakers such as Sen. Debbie Stabenow have raised concerns over provisions affecting DeFi and tokenized equities, and the draft has ballooned to more than 100 amendments—an indicator of how far consensus remains.

Reasons For Delay

Several factors have contributed to the latest setbacks.

Coinbase, the largest U.S. crypto exchange, withdrew its support for the Senate draft on Jan. 15, 2026, citing “too many issues,” including proposed bans on stablecoin yield and expanded SEC authority over crypto markets.

CEO Brian Armstrong called the draft “materially worse than the status quo.”

The move dealt a major blow to the bill, as Coinbase’s support was seen as critical to maintaining industry consensus.

With midterm elections approaching in November 2026, lawmakers are increasingly prioritizing voter-focused issues such as housing affordability.

Funding measures and other Trump-backed initiatives are taking precedence, potentially pushing crypto legislation further down the agenda.

Political polarization and the bill’s complexity have also fueled concerns that partisan point-scoring could derail progress.

A shift in Senate control during the midterms could further jeopardize the bill’s chances.

In the meantime, the SEC and CFTC are pursuing rulemaking and potential “exemptive relief” that could ease certain regulatory burdens without new legislation.

While this may reduce near-term pressure to pass the bill, it falls short of the comprehensive framework the industry has been seeking.

Overall, analysts estimate a 50–60% chance of passage in 2026, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory authority in the coming months.

2026 CLARITY Act Still Possible?

Despite the delays, passage in 2026 is still possible. If markups resume in late February and key disputes are resolved, the bill could advance.

However, the approaching November midterm elections add political risk, as shifting control of Congress could derail the effort entirely.

In the meantime, regulators may attempt to fill the gap.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins has signaled a significant easing of enforcement pressure through rulemaking and exemptive relief, offering some short-term breathing room for the industry even as comprehensive legislation remains stalled.

At its core, the market structure bill aims to clarify the regulatory divide between the SEC and CFTC, define when crypto tokens qualify as securities or commodities, and establish clearer rules around stablecoins, DeFi, and consumer protections.

Whether those goals can survive the current political logjam will shape the U.S. crypto landscape for years to come.

Top Picks for Bitcoin
  • Best Exchanges for Bitcoin Get A Great Offer When You Join These Exchanges
  • Buy Bitcoin Fast & Easy How To Buy Bitcoin With a Credit Card Now
  • Best Online Casinos for Bitcoin See Our Picks for the Best Crypto Gambling Sites

Related Questions

QWhy was the US crypto market structure bill delayed again in January 2026?

AThe bill was delayed due to Coinbase withdrawing its support, shifting political priorities such as housing affordability legislation, partisan negotiations, and the complexity of the bill with over 100 amendments.

QWhat are the key differences between the Republican and Democratic positions on the crypto market structure bill?

ARepublicans push for lighter oversight under the CFTC, while Democrats emphasize stronger consumer protections and have raised concerns about provisions affecting DeFi and tokenized equities.

QWhat impact did Coinbase's withdrawal of support have on the bill?

ACoinbase's withdrawal dealt a major blow to the bill, as its support was critical for maintaining industry consensus, citing issues like proposed bans on stablecoin yield and expanded SEC authority.

QIs passage of the crypto market structure bill still possible in 2026, and what are the chances?

APassage in 2026 is still possible with an estimated 50-60% chance, contingent on resolving disputes over stablecoins and regulatory authority, but midterm elections add political risk.

QHow are regulators like the SEC and CFTC addressing crypto regulation in the absence of the bill?

AThe SEC and CFTC are pursuing rulemaking and potential 'exemptive relief' to ease certain regulatory burdens, though this falls short of the comprehensive framework the industry seeks.

Related Reads

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手4h ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手4h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit7h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit7h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手8h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手8h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit9h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit9h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片