U.S. Lawmakers Push to Clarify Crypto Developer Liability Under Federal Law

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-13Last updated on 2026-01-13

Abstract

U.S. Senators Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden have reintroduced the bipartisan Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to protect cryptocurrency developers from being wrongly classified as financial institutions or money transmitters. The bill clarifies that liability should be based on control of user funds, not merely writing or maintaining code. This addresses growing legal uncertainty and fear among developers, especially following recent Department of Justice cases involving privacy tools. Lawmakers argue that misapplying financial regulations to developers who don’t handle funds is unfair, stifles innovation, and could drive talent overseas. The legislation aims to safeguard open-source development and prevent overreach by ensuring only entities with actual control over assets face strict regulatory obligations.

Two U.S. senators, Cynthia Lummis and Ron Wyden, have reintroduced a bipartisan bill called the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act to protect cryptocurrency developers from being wrongly treated as banks or financial institutions under U.S. law.

This bill can help resolve the issue between U.S. law and cryptocurrency developers. Right now, the law is unclear about who counts and handles the money of the users. Because of this, some developers who only write the code and never handle the users’ money, or don’t even control wallets, are being treated as the money-handling company and being charged. This risk has grown after the recent DOJ cases involving privacy and self-custody tools, and many developers are in fear of building crypto tools.

Control, Not Code: Lawmakers Push to Shield Crypto Developers From Liability

The bill says that control matters a lot, not the code. If you only write or maintain software and you cannot access or control the funds, and you don’t have legal authority over assets, then you should not be treated as a money transmitter. Only companies that actually control funds should follow strict money laws.

The bill was urgently reintroduced because the issue became very serious. Developers have already been criminally charged, and this fear for the developers could push them out of the U.S., thus bringing slow innovations and breaking open-source development. So the lawmakers have realized this is dangerous and unfair, and they want to fix the rule before more damage happens.

Both Lummis and Wyden have played a major role in bringing this bill urgently. Lummis says that there is no use in regulating the developers like banks when they never handle the users’ money. Wyden warns that forcing developers to follow the exchange-level rules is technologically ignorant and harmful to privacy. Both argue that liability should follow actual control of funds.

This law helps to keep the crypto tools open and innovation alive, with developers safe. If the developers are afraid of building the tools, fewer wallets will be built, and there will be fewer innovations and more control by the big companies.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Red Candles Stack Up for OFFICIAL TRUMP (TRUMP): Will Sellers Tighten Their Grip?

TagsCryptoSenator

Related Questions

QWhat is the name of the bipartisan bill reintroduced by Senators Lummis and Wyden?

AThe Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act.

QAccording to the bill, what is the key factor that should determine if someone is treated as a money transmitter?

AActual control over the funds, not just writing or maintaining the code.

QWhy was the bill urgently reintroduced, according to the article?

ABecause developers have already been criminally charged, creating fear that could push innovation out of the U.S. and harm open-source development.

QWhat negative consequence could occur if developers are afraid to build crypto tools?

AFewer wallets and innovations would be built, leading to more control by big companies.

QWhich U.S. government agency's recent cases were mentioned as increasing the risk for developers?

AThe Department of Justice (DOJ).

Related Reads

A Serious Threat is Looming for Bitcoin (BTC) and Cryptocurrencies: They Could Be the First Target!

The rapid advancement of quantum computing poses a serious threat not only to cryptocurrencies but to the entire encryption system, including banking. However, experts warn that the cryptocurrency market might be the first sector to suffer from this transformation. As predictions of a 'Q-Day' approach, the slow governance processes of cryptocurrencies, rather than their cryptography, could become the biggest obstacle to defending against quantum attacks. Quantum Xchange CEO Eddy Zervigon has compared cryptocurrencies to "canaries in the coal mine," stating that the first successful quantum-powered cyberattack is likely to target decentralized blockchain networks. While a cryptographically relevant quantum computer capable of breaking the elliptic curve cryptography underlying Bitcoin's signatures and banking security does not yet exist, work by giants like Microsoft, IBM, and Google suggests the threat is nearer than previously thought. The industry consensus estimates such a computer could emerge around 2029. Supporting this view, recent Google research indicates the number of physical qubits needed to break the cryptographic systems protecting Bitcoin and Ethereum has decreased by about 20 times compared to prior estimates, highlighting the accelerated danger. Zervigon concludes that Bitcoin's greatest risk lies not in its current cryptographic system, but in the slow pace of implementing major network upgrades.

cryptonews.ru11m ago

A Serious Threat is Looming for Bitcoin (BTC) and Cryptocurrencies: They Could Be the First Target!

cryptonews.ru11m ago

Crypto Outperforming Stocks: How Digital Assets Are Withstanding Macroeconomic Pressure

Crypto Outperforms Stocks Amid Macro Pressure Trading firm QCP Capital's report analyzes the divergent performance of crypto and stock markets ahead of the July 29 FOMC meeting. While major US stock indexes showed mixed results, with tech weakness pressuring the Nasdaq, crypto assets like Bitcoin (up ~11.6% in July) and Ethereum (up ~24.6%) have outperformed despite a challenging macro backdrop, including rising Treasury yields and risk-off sentiment. Key focus points include the upcoming Fed decision and commentary from Chair Kevin Warsh, which could signal the regulator's stance on inflation and growth. Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs saw a net outflow of ~$311 million on July 24, ending a seven-day inflow streak, highlighting shifting institutional sentiment. Option market data reveals increased demand for downside protection, indicating caution, though constructive long-term positioning remains. Implied volatility for Ethereum trades at a premium to Bitcoin, and perpetual funding rates stay positive. The week's key events are the FOMC decision, Treasury yield movements, ETF flow trends, and US regulatory developments like the CLARITY Act. The market balances crypto's resilience against growing option market caution, with the Fed's decision poised to tip the scales. Analysis compares the current Fed pause to historical rate-cutting cycles, questioning whether crypto's strength can persist if monetary policy tightening persists.

cryptonews.ru21m ago

Crypto Outperforming Stocks: How Digital Assets Are Withstanding Macroeconomic Pressure

cryptonews.ru21m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片