US Fed Chair Jerome Powell Gets Global Support, No Rate Cut Likely

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-13Last updated on 2026-01-13

Abstract

US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has received strong backing from global central bankers, including the heads of the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of Canada. They emphasized the importance of central bank independence for economic stability. This support comes amid ongoing tension with former President Donald Trump over interest rate policies. According to market predictions, there is a 94.5% chance the Fed will not cut rates in the upcoming January meeting. The last rate cut occurred in December 2025, reducing the lending rate to 3.5%-3.75%. Powell has stated that recent legal scrutiny may be an attempt to undermine the Fed’s independence.

The US Fed Chair Jerome Powell has received support from global central bankers. This comes amid the rising tension between him and US President Donald Trump. Support in such a large number has triggered anticipation of no rate cut in the January meeting. Thereby affecting the crypto market to some extent.

Support Flows for US Fed Chair Jerome Powell

Over eight heads of global institutions have backed the actions of US Fed Chair Jerome Powell. They have said that he acted with integrity, adding that the US Federal Reserve was independent in keeping prices plus financial markets stable. Some of the supportive bankers are the heads of the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of Canada.

A joint statement issued by them underlines that all of them stand in full solidarity, highlighting that the independence of a central bank is always a cornerstone to stability in price, economy, and finance.

Notably, this is not the first time Trump has had a feud with Powell regarding a rate cut. A report from last year shows a similar pattern where the US President criticized Jerome for refusing to cut rates.

What Happens to the Fed Rate Cut Now?

There is a 94.5% chance for the Fed Reserve to not change rates, according to Polymarket. The central bank last slashed rates in December 2025 by 25 bps. This brought the lending rate down to the range of 3.5% and 3.75%. Similar reductions were done in September and October 2025.

Additionally, there is a 5.3% chance for a 25 bps reduction and less than 1% chance for a 50 bps reduction.

Slashing lending rates, for a quick reference, increases borrowing power – allowing markets to make more investments in different sectors, including the crypto segment. However, it often triggers nationwide inflation, which, for the US, last dropped to 6.89% in November 2025. This was down from 3.01% in September 2025.

The Trump-Powell Feud

Powell, in a recent report, stated that his indictment was possibly due to refusing rate cuts after the January meeting. Like last year, it is reported that Trump insisted on slashing the rate again in January 2026; however, Powell disagreed by citing that the agency would only take decisions based on its assessment.

For now, the Department of Justice (DoJ) is probing the case, and prosecutors are scrutinizing renovations along with his testimony. Jerome has also claimed that this is an attempt to weaken the independence of the US central bank.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Eric Adams’ Solana Meme Coin NYC Crashes After $580M Peak

TagsJerome Powellrate cutUS Federal

Related Questions

QWhy did global central bankers express support for US Fed Chair Jerome Powell?

AGlobal central bankers expressed support for Jerome Powell because they believe he acted with integrity and that the US Federal Reserve's independence is crucial for maintaining price and financial market stability.

QWhat is the market's expectation for the Fed's interest rate decision in the January meeting according to Polymarket?

AAccording to Polymarket, there is a 94.5% chance that the Fed will not change interest rates in the January meeting.

QHow does slashing lending rates affect the economy and the crypto market?

ASlashing lending rates increases borrowing power, which allows markets to make more investments in various sectors, including the crypto segment. However, it can also trigger nationwide inflation.

QWhat was the reason behind the recent feud between Donald Trump and Jerome Powell?

AThe recent feud between Donald Trump and Jerome Powell arose because Trump insisted on cutting interest rates again in January 2026, but Powell refused, stating that the Federal Reserve would only make decisions based on its own assessment.

QWhat did Jerome Powell claim about the indictment against him?

AJerome Powell claimed that his indictment was possibly due to his refusal to cut interest rates after the January meeting and that it was an attempt to weaken the independence of the US central bank.

Related Reads

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1m ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1m ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit42m ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit42m ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

A social media claim has brought attention to Hyperliquid (HYPE) and the growth of its related ETF products. According to a June 20 post on X by AlphaOnChain, three Hyperliquid ETFs launched in May 2026 have collectively amassed $158 million in assets under management, led by a Bitwise fund with $88 million and a 21Shares fund with $66 million. The article notes this claim is from social media and not verified by official issuer data, advising caution. Nonetheless, the report highlights that HYPE is gaining traction as a notable altcoin narrative. Its focus on on-chain perpetual trading and exchange infrastructure places it at the intersection of DeFi and derivatives, attracting traders looking for high-conviction plays beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum. The key takeaway is that while social momentum can influence short-term markets, sustainable growth for HYPE would require confirmed demand, liquidity, and continued ecosystem development.

bitcoinist2h ago

Hyperliquid ETF Claim Draws Attention As HYPE Narrative Builds On X

bitcoinist2h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit2h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit2h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbit2h ago

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片