Uniswap (UNI) Volume Soars 500%, Will the Recent Spike Turn Into a Breakout?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-12Last updated on 2026-02-12

Abstract

Despite a generally bearish crypto market, Uniswap (UNI) experienced a significant surge, with its price gaining 5.23% and trading volume soaring over 568% to $1.05 billion. After opening at $3.23, the price climbed to a high of $4.37 before settling at $3.39. However, technical indicators suggest a potential bearish correction. The MACD and signal lines are below zero, indicating a negative trend, and the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) at -0.24 shows strong selling pressure. The RSI at 48.19 is neutral, while the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of -0.036 indicates slight bearish dominance. Key support is at $3.31, with resistance at $3.47.

With a 0.45% spike in the market, some of the crypto assets are charted in green. The bearish dominance has erased all the recent gains, keeping the broader sentiment in extreme fear. The largest asset, Bitcoin (BTC), trades around $66.9K, while Ethereum (ETH), the largest altcoin, hovers at $1.9K. Among other altcoins, Uniswap (UNI) lit green on the chart with a 5.23% gain.

The asset opened the day trading at a bottom level of $3.23, and the entry of bulls was lightning-fast, resulting in the UNI price climbing to a high range of $4.37. According to CMC data, at press time, Uniswap traded at $3.39, with its market cap resting at $2.12 billion. Notably, the daily trading volume has increased by over 568% touched the $1.05 billion zone.

Uniswap’s 4-hour trading pattern reveals the negative outlook, and the price could slip to the key support at around $3.31. Assuming the downside correction intensifies, the asset’s price may steadily fall toward $3.23 or even lower. On the flip side, if the UNI bulls reclaimed power against the pressure, the price movement might rise to a retest of the $3.47 resistance. As the token continues to move upward, it will climb high toward the $3.55 range.

Uniswap Faces Bearish Correction on the Charts

When both the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) and the signal lines of Uniswap are below the zero line, displaying its bearish mood. As the downward momentum dominates, the broader trend is negative. Only a bullish move above zero can rescue the asset.

In addition, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator is located at -0.24, pointing to a strong selling pressure in the UNI market. There is a significant amount of capital outflows, and if the negative reading persists, it likely supports the downside momentum to continue.

Uniswap’s daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) is found at 48.19 suggests neutral momentum. It is neither overbought nor oversold, hovering near the midpoint of 50, and a move above it hints at strengthening bullish pressure, while a drop below 40 may signal growing weakness.

Furthermore, the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of -0.036 indicates slight bearish dominance. With the negative value, the sellers have a marginal edge. Also, as the magnitude is very small, the ongoing market momentum of UNI is weak rather than strongly bearish.

Top Updated Crypto News

73% Price Jump and 404% Volume Boom: Can Berachain (BERA) Power Higher?

TagsAltcoinCryptocurrencyUNIUniswap

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage increase in Uniswap's (UNI) daily trading volume mentioned in the article?

AThe daily trading volume of Uniswap (UNI) increased by over 568%.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what is the key support level for UNI's price?

AThe key support level for UNI's price is around $3.31.

QWhat does the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator value of -0.24 indicate about the UNI market?

AA CMF value of -0.24 indicates strong selling pressure and significant capital outflows in the UNI market.

QWhat is the significance of the Relative Strength Index (RSI) reading of 48.19 for Uniswap?

AAn RSI reading of 48.19 suggests a neutral momentum, meaning the asset is neither overbought nor oversold.

QWhat condition would 'rescue' the asset from its bearish trend according to the MACD analysis?

AA bullish move above the zero line by the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) could rescue the asset from its bearish trend.

Related Reads

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbit2m ago

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbit2m ago

The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

Economists from the ASEAN+3 Macroeconomic Research Office (AMRO) suggest that the winner in the artificial intelligence (AI) race may not be the country developing the most powerful AI model, but the one whose currency underpins these models and their infrastructure. Their thesis outlines a potential cycle where AI-related costs—such as energy for data centers, infrastructure, and usage fees—are denominated in U.S. dollars. As AI grows into a massive industry, this could significantly increase global demand for U.S. dollar liquidity (first channel of dollar dominance). A second channel involves the currency used for payments between AI agents, expected to become widespread in logistics, inventory, and treasury management. Dollar-pegged stablecoins could provide the programmable settlements required for such agent commerce. These two channels may converge, creating a self-reinforcing "dollar loop" where AI computational payments are settled in stablecoins. Stablecoins could gain an early advantage over alternatives like CBDCs due to existing network effects, further entrenching dollar dominance. This would also boost demand for U.S. Treasury bonds used as collateral for stablecoin reserves. The report warns ASEAN+3 nations of over-reliance on this dollar loop and suggests developing regional data centers and tokenized money based on local currencies to participate in the AI economy without reinforcing dollar dependency.

cryptonews.ru4m ago

The Artificial Intelligence Economy Could Accelerate the Establishment of Dominance for Dollar-Pegged Stablecoins

cryptonews.ru4m ago

Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

Base, a layer-2 blockchain, argues that its established distribution network will outlast Robinhood Chain's initial popularity surge. While Robinhood Chain quickly attracted 230,000 daily active users and over $9 billion in DEX volume (primarily from meme coins) shortly after launch, its core feature of tokenized stocks saw minimal use. Base acknowledged shortcomings in focusing on social blockchain products and lagging in areas like perpetual contracts, predictions markets, and on-chain tokenized stocks—a move Robinhood got right. In response, Base highlights its nearly three-year head start in building infrastructure. It emphasizes its x402 payment protocol, which has processed 187.8 million agent payments, its $3.9 billion in stablecoin deposits (mostly USDC), and its integration with partners like Visa, Shopify, and JPMorgan for institutional and merchant settlements. Base contends these capabilities for corporate payments and stablecoin liquidity represent a more durable and defensible ecosystem than Robinhood's retail trading metrics. Coinbase plans to launch its own on-chain, share-backed tokenized stocks on Base, which would directly challenge Robinhood's key differentiating feature. Base's strategy bets that its deep-rooted distribution and institutional partnerships will prove harder to overcome than Robinhood's early, meme-driven volume, which may fade after the initial launch hype.

cryptonews.ru7m ago

Base Claims Its Distribution Advantage Can Outlast Robinhood Chain's Initial Surge

cryptonews.ru7m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片