Trump Backs U.S. Clarity Act, Accuses Major Banks of Undermining GENIUS

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has called for the enactment of the U.S. Clarity Act, which aims to link the country’s economic strength with clear cryptocurrency regulations. In a speech to lawmakers and industry representatives, Trump accused major financial institutions of stifling innovation by impeding technological progress. He argued that regulatory ambiguity has driven crypto businesses and talent overseas, and that well-defined legislation would attract investment and bolster U.S. financial competitiveness. Trump emphasized that legislative clarity would balance innovation with investor protection, warning that the U.S. risks falling behind other nations that offer more certain regulatory environments. The Clarity Act has garnered bipartisan support and seeks to clarify the roles of the CFTC and SEC regarding digital assets, potentially reducing compliance costs and encouraging market confidence. The bill also includes provisions for certain exemptions to foster innovation. Negotiations over the final language of the legislation are ongoing amid mixed reactions from financial institutions and other stakeholders.

The former president of the United States, Donald Trump, urged lawmakers to enact the U.S. Clarity Act, which links the economic prowess of the country with clear crypto rules. In a speech to lawmakers and industry representatives, Trump urged them to enact the Clarity Act to bring clarity to crypto markets. In the speech, Trump accused big financial institutions of undermining innovation in the country by slowing down technological advancements.

Trump claimed that unclear rules have harmed the development of crypto businesses and encouraged talent to move abroad. However, with clear legislation, the country can attract investment and increase its financial prowess globally. In addition, the former president urged lawmakers to avoid excessive regulation without clear legislative backing.

However, enforcement-based regulation, as described by Trump, creates uncertainty for both entrepreneurs and established businesses. According to him, legislative clarity can strike a balance between innovation and investor protection. The statements made by Trump underscored his view that America is at risk of losing a competitive advantage in digital asset regulation. He said that if other countries are able to provide certainty in their regulation, they could attract capital and talent from the American market.

Trump urged lawmakers to put aside their differences and help him move the Clarity Act forward. He said that the bill has already gained bipartisan support from both Congress and the Senate. The statements made by Trump underscored the debate about regulating new financial technologies. The Clarity Act has been supported by those who believe that institutional and retail participation can be facilitated by a clear legal framework, while others believe that poorly structured laws could become barriers to innovation.

Regulatory Context and Market Implications of the Clarity Act

The purpose of the Clarity Act is to determine the jurisdiction of the CFTC and the SEC in different digital assets. According to its proponents, this will help reduce compliance costs for crypto firms. Analysts have pointed out that regulatory confusion has been a problem for various platforms in the crypto space.

There is also a provision for special exemptions for different digital asset activities to encourage innovation in the space. According to various market participants who have been tracking the bill’s progress in Congress, this will help build confidence in the market. Different financial institutions have reacted to the bill in different ways.

Others recognize the potential for legal certainty to facilitate the integration of digital assets into traditional systems of finance. Negotiations on the language of the final bills are underway for lawmakers, and the debate continues on the response from various stakeholders before the final passage.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Pardoned BitMEX Cofounder Pledges £20 Million to London Maths Institute

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinist23m ago

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinist23m ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit23m ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit23m ago

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbit28m ago

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbit28m ago

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbit1h ago

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbit1h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit2h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School