Truebit Confirms Smart Contract Exploit as TRU Price Crashes

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-09Last updated on 2026-01-09

Abstract

Truebit, an Ethereum-based DeFi protocol, confirmed a smart contract exploit on January 8. The incident involved a logic flaw in a minting contract that allowed an attacker to repeatedly exploit incorrect pricing calculations, leading to a loss of 8,535 ETH (approximately $26.44 million). Following the announcement, the price of the TRU token collapsed by 99.99%, dropping from $0.16 to nearly zero. Truebit is working with law enforcement and has advised users to avoid interacting with the affected contract. No official recovery plan has been released yet.

Truebit protocol, an Ethereum-based DeFi, announced a security incident relating to one of its smart contracts on January 8 through its official X handle. They also mentioned that they have been working with law authorities to address the issue, and suggested users not to connect to that specific smart contract till the issue is resolved.

Before Truebit’s verification, the on-chain analytics platform Lookonchain stated that this protocol had been exploited with 8,535 ETH, worth around $26.44 million.

Then, on the same day, CertiK Alert on its X handle flagged an unusually large on-chain transaction involving the Truebit protocol. It has been noted that the wallet linked to Truebit has shifted 8,535 ETH into one address, which involves a pattern that did not match the normal protocol activity and marked it as suspicious.

The thread post explains that the attacker abused a logic flaw in a purchase or minting contract, where the pricing calculation broke for certain inputs and effectively returned an incorrect value, showing a very low cost. The attacker figured this out and used the bug again and again, was able to mint or redeem assets improperly, and drain ETH from the protocol’s reserves.

Truebit (TRU) Token Price Collapses

After the news of Truebit’s smart contract exploit incident, the TRU token has immediate effect on its price, which has fallen sharply by 99.99% in the last 24 hours, and it dropped from $0.16 to $0.00000001845, as this instant price decline depicts the trader’s reaction to Truebit’s loss and the uncertainty surrounding it.

So far, Truebit has not released any official updates or recovery plans; instead, they stated that any incident-related information would be shared through its official channels.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

‌Bitnomial Wins CFTC Approval to Launch U.S. Prediction Markets

TagsTRUTruebit

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat did Truebit announce regarding its smart contract on January 8?

ATruebit announced a security incident relating to one of its smart contracts and stated they were working with law authorities to address the issue.

QHow much ETH was reportedly exploited from the Truebit protocol according to Lookonchain?

AAccording to Lookonchain, 8,535 ETH, worth approximately $26.44 million, was exploited.

QWhat was the nature of the exploit that the attacker abused in the Truebit contract?

AThe attacker abused a logic flaw in a purchase or minting contract where the pricing calculation broke for certain inputs, returning an incorrect, very low cost value, allowing them to mint or redeem assets improperly.

QWhat was the impact on the TRU token's price following the news of the exploit?

AThe TRU token price collapsed, falling sharply by 99.99% in 24 hours, from $0.16 to approximately $0.00000001845.

QHas Truebit released an official recovery plan for the incident?

ANo, Truebit has not released any official updates or recovery plans yet, stating that any incident-related information would be shared through its official channels.

Related Reads

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit16m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit16m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit25m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit25m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片