TKF Report Highlights Uncollected TDS in India from Offshore VDA Trading

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-13Last updated on 2026-01-13

Abstract

A TKF Report titled "Taxation of Digital Assets in India" highlights significant uncollected TDS from offshore cryptocurrency exchange platforms, estimated at approximately ₹11,000 crore since July 2022. Of this, ₹4,877 crore pertains to the last year alone, indicating a major shift of Indian trading activity beyond the nation’s taxation framework. The Bharat Web3 Association shared the report, emphasizing that regulatory arbitrage and uneven enforcement are causing sustained revenue leakage. In contrast, the Indian government collected ₹158 crore in FY22-23, ₹180 crore in FY23-24, and around ₹450 crore in FY24-25 from domestic platforms. CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta previously suggested key policy changes, including reducing TDS to 0.01%, aligning capital gains tax with income slabs, and allowing loss offsetting to encourage onshore platform usage and ensure tax equity.

TKF Report, titled Taxation of Digital Assets in India, has highlighted that there is a significant amount of uncollected TDS from offshore exchange platforms. Bharat Web3 Association has further shed light by sharing the report with the community. Notably, this comes days after CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta listed three key changes that could help the country become a leader in the segment.

Key Points from TKF Report

According to the TKF Report, Taxation of Digital Assets in India, the uncollected TDS is approximately ₹11,000 crore. This is cumulative since July 2022 – that is when the tax was introduced for the crypto sphere in the country. Out of this amount, around ₹4,877 crore pertains to the last year alone.

Notably, the uncollected TDS mentioned is from offshore exchanges, which many community members have tagged as a possible revenue leak.

The government reportedly collected ₹158 crore in FY 22-23, within the first few months of the implementation of the tax. Tax collection increased to ₹180 crore in the next year, that is in FY 23-24. For FY 24-25, collections stood at around ₹450 crore as a result of global tailwind pushing the country’s crypto industry forward, according to the report.

Bharat Web3 Association Speaks

Bharat Web3 Association, an apex body for leading Web3 technology Indian companies, shared the report. It underlined that the uncollected TDS further indicates a major shift in Indian trading activity beyond the scope of the nation’s taxation and reporting framework.

The association further emphasized how regulatory arbitrage and uneven enforcement translated into sustained revenue leakage, a similar point later echoed by community members. Bharat Web3 Association has reinforced the need for a calibrated policy approach to make companies stronger, with a core focus on helping onshore platforms retain activities.

Sumit Gupta Suggests Key Changes

CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta had earlier suggested three key changes to reset India’s crypto policy. He suggested a standardized TDS of 0.01% instead of 1%, adding that a lower compliance cost would bring more users back to regulated platforms, including onshore ventures.

Sumit then suggested aligning the capital tax of 30% with income slabs, explaining that the current flat rate violated tax equity. He highlighted that progressive taxation would encourage legitimate wealth creation and signal fairness principles. Finally, CoinDCX CEO suggested allowing loss offsetting for crypto investors against other income.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

World Liberty Financial Launches On-Chain Lending Market Built on Dolomite

TagsCryptoIndiaVirtual Digital Assets (VDA)

Related Questions

QWhat is the estimated amount of uncollected TDS from offshore VDA trading platforms in India, as highlighted by the TKF Report?

AThe TKF Report estimates the uncollected TDS to be approximately ₹11,000 crore cumulatively since July 2022.

QWhich Indian association shared the TKF report and what key concern did it highlight regarding the uncollected TDS?

AThe Bharat Web3 Association shared the report. It highlighted that the uncollected TDS indicates a major shift of Indian trading activity to platforms beyond the nation's taxation and reporting framework, leading to sustained revenue leakage.

QWhat were the three key policy changes suggested by CoinDCX CEO Sumit Gupta for India's crypto sector?

ASumit Gupta suggested: 1. Reducing the TDS rate to a standardized 0.01% from 1%. 2. Aligning the capital gains tax with income slabs instead of a flat 30%. 3. Allowing investors to offset crypto losses against other income.

QHow much TDS did the Indian government collect in the fiscal year 2023-24 according to the report?

AThe Indian government collected ₹180 crore in TDS in the fiscal year 2023-24.

QSince when has the 1% TDS on crypto transactions been in effect in India, as mentioned in the article?

AThe 1% TDS on crypto transactions was introduced in July 2022.

Related Reads

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit49m ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit49m ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片