The Scythe of Bitcoin's Leading Figure: A Record of a Nasdaq Robbery

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-18Last updated on 2026-02-18

Abstract

This investigation details a sophisticated financial scheme orchestrated by David Bailey, CEO of Nakamoto Holdings ($NAKA). Through a reverse merger with a shell company, NAKA's stock skyrocketed from $2 to over $30, luring retail investors while early PIPE investors entered at just $1.12 per share. The stock then collapsed by 99% to $0.29. Amid the crash, Bailey engaged in desperate debt refinancing, accruing massive losses. He then used the crippled public company to acquire his own private firms, BTC Inc and UTXO Management, at a fixed share price of $1.12—nearly four times the market rate. This acquisition, approved by shareholders during the stock's peak without their full understanding, resulted in massive dilution for existing investors. The entire operation, while technically compliant, transferred wealth from retail investors to insiders. Bailey, who compared himself to historical financial dynasties, ultimately used the wreckage of the public company to enrich himself and his private empire, showcasing a brutal intersection of influencer culture and public markets.

Editor's Note: This article provides an in-depth analysis of the astonishing capital operations behind David Bailey and the Nakamoto Holdings ($NAKA) he controls. From the frenzied surge during the backdoor listing to the 99% crash after retail investors entered the market, and then using the devastated listed company to acquire his private assets at a high premium, it is a meticulously designed wealth transfer leveraging information asymmetry and regulatory loopholes.

This is a brutal investigation into greed, compliance games, and influencer capitalism. It serves as a warning that when belief is packaged as a financial product, and when the slogan of decentralization meets centralized greed, retail investors are often the last exit liquidity. Understanding this story might give you more clarity and less blind following the next time a big name promotes an investment.

Below is the full content:

This morning, David Bailey used a listed company whose market value has evaporated by 99% to acquire two private companies he founded at a premium four times the current stock price—all without requiring a shareholder vote.

What's most shocking? This asset transfer drama was locked in long before retail investors bought their first share.

To understand how this was done, we must start from the beginning.

In May 2025, a zombie company named KindlyMD announced a merger with Nakamoto Holdings, a Bitcoin reserve tool founded by David Bailey.

The stock price soared from $2 to over $30 within days, attracting a flood of retail investors. Bitcoin influencers celebrated, and Bailey even compared himself to the Morgans, the Medicis, and the Rothschilds.

Nine months later, the stock price fell to 29 cents, and Bailey just used this stock to buy his own companies.

The Pump

The mechanism was quite ingeniously designed.

KindlyMD was originally an unnoticed micro-cap stock on Nasdaq. Nakamoto Holdings went public through a reverse merger, backed by $510 million in PIPE (Private Investment in Public Equity) financing and $200 million in convertible bonds.

On paper, it seemed like the birth of a Bitcoin reserve giant, with a new generation of Bitcoin influencers rushing to tell you why to buy $NAKA (of course, the reason was to own more Bitcoin).

Within days, NAKA's price-to-NAV ratio reached an astonishing 23x, meaning speculators paid $23 for every $1 of Bitcoin held by the company.

Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy never reached such a premium. The difference is that MicroStrategy has years of operational history, a software business generating actual revenue, and a CEO who didn't manipulate the transaction structure to enrich himself on the backend.

Insiders knew secrets that retail investors didn't. The PIPE investors—including the notorious BIP-110 opponents Udi Wertheimer, Jameson Lopp, and Adam Back—got in at $1.12 per share. Retail investors bought at $28, $30, $31, and even higher.

This information asymmetry was built into the structure from day one.

In June, Bailey completed another $51.5 million PIPE financing at $5.00 per share. Although the second batch of investors got in at a much lower cost than retail, it was still far above the $1.12 floor price, and they were ultimately harvested too.

Bailey celebrated the financing, saying it took less than 72 hours and investor demand was extremely strong.

Let's take a closer look at this strategy.

The Dump

By September, NAKA had plummeted by 96%.

The early PIPE investors who obtained shares at $1.12 could finally cash out after the merger was completed in August, and they did so.

Bailey's response was quite bizarre for a public company CEO; he told shareholders who were just there for a quick trade to leave.

So they left.

The stock price continued to fall. Below $1. Below 50 cents. Below 30 cents. A company holding about 5,765 Bitcoins (worth over $500 million) now had a market cap of less than $300 million.

The market valued Nakamoto even lower than the Bitcoin on its balance sheet, which says a lot about how investors view the management team and corporate structure wrapped around these Bitcoins.

Debt Spiral

As the stock price crashed, Bailey changed lenders frequently, like a gambler borrowing money on the casino floor.

The initial capital structure included $200 million in convertible bonds from Yorkville Advisors, with a conversion price of $2.80. As NAKA's stock price fell below this level, the convertible bonds became debt that could devour equity. So, on October 3, Nakamoto took out a $203 million term loan from Two Prime Lending to redeem Yorkville's notes and interest.

Four days later, on October 7, they borrowed $206 million in USDT from Antalpha at 7% interest to repay Two Prime. Antalpha's loan had a term of only 30 days (with an option to extend for another 30 days). They replaced the term loan with a 30-day bridge loan within a week.

The plan was to convert this bridge loan into a $250 million 5-year secured convertible bond from Antalpha. Use the new convertible to repay the bridge loan, the bridge loan to repay the term loan, and the term loan to repay the old convertible.

But that $250 million convertible never materialized on Antalpha's terms.

On December 16, Nakamoto borrowed $210 million in USDT from Kraken at 8% interest, over-collateralized by 150% with Bitcoin from its treasury.

Do the math: The lender has $315 million worth of Bitcoin as collateral for a $210 million loan. If NAKA's stock goes to zero, Kraken takes the collateral. If Bitcoin drops 33%, Kraken remains unscathed. At every stage of this drama, the lenders were tightly protected, while common shareholders bore the full brunt of the reflexive crash.

Each new loan tightened the noose.

Countdown

On December 10, Nasdaq notified Nakamoto that it faced delisting risk because its stock price had been below $1 for 30 consecutive business days. The company must regain compliance by June 8, 2026, meaning the closing price must be above $1 for 10 consecutive trading days.

The current stock price is 29 cents.

If delisted, Nakamoto would be unable to conduct ATM (at-the-Market) offerings, issue convertible bonds, or use stock as acquisition currency. Everything Bailey assembled in this shell relies on a Nasdaq listing that currently cannot be maintained.

Accounting Disaster

In November, Nakamoto filed a Form 12b-25 with the SEC, admitting it could not submit its quarterly financial report on time due to accounting complexities from the merger. Preliminary data revealed the truth:

The Nakamoto acquisition resulted in a $59.75 million loss (payment price higher than net asset value)

$22.07 million unrealized loss on digital assets

$1.41 million realized loss from selling Bitcoin

$14.45 million loss on debt extinguishment from refinancing rotations

A quarterly loss of approximately $97 million, partially offset by a $21.8 million accounting gain from contingent liabilities. This company, which was supposed to be the perfect Bitcoin reserve tool, couldn't even submit its books on time.

The Heist

This brings us back to this morning.

Nakamoto announced signing a definitive merger agreement to acquire BTC Inc and UTXO Management. BTC Inc owns Bitcoin Magazine and operates the Bitcoin Conference. UTXO manages a Bitcoin-focused hedge fund.

Bailey is the Chairman and CEO of the buyer, Nakamoto.

He is also the founder of the sellers, BTC Inc and UTXO.

He is the buyer, the seller, and the CEO approving the terms.

But weeks before the acquisition, he quietly handed the CEO title to Brandon Greene, creating a paper-thin separation between himself and the entities he was about to buy with shareholder equity.

This morning's deal was entirely financed with Nakamoto stock, priced at $1.12 per share based on a call option embedded in the original marketing services agreement. And $NAKA is still struggling to climb back to $0.29.

Bailey's companies received a stock valuation nearly four times the current market price. Security holders of BTC Inc and UTXO will receive 363.6 million shares, valuing the deal at $107.3 million at market prices.

But these shares were issued at $1.12, meaning the deal was structured when NAKA's stock was flying high, and the terms were never adjusted when the stock crashed.

Forget the fictional pricing on the contract. What really matters is that 363.6 million new shares just entered the float. Regardless of whether the documents say $1.12 or $0.29, existing shareholders were diluted by this quantity. The $1.12 label is a courtesy to the seller, but the dilution is real.

No additional shareholder approval was needed because the call option was already embedded in the original merger documents, and shareholders voted to approve them when NAKA's stock was still at $20, $30.

The retail investors who approved these terms had no idea they were authorizing the future acquisition of Bailey's private business at a locked-in high premium while their own shares were turning to dust.

Architecture of Self-Dealing

Stepping back, the entire architecture is breathtakingly elegant.

Bailey created Nakamoto Holdings. Merged it into a public shell company via KindlyMD, raising $710 million in the process. Driven by retail enthusiasm, the stock was pumped to 23x NAV. PIPE investors got in at $1.12, while the public paid 20 to 30 times that. The stock then crashed 99%.

During this time, the company changed lenders three times in a week, trying to manage $200 million in debt that was structured to convert to equity when the stock price was much higher.

Now, with the shattered stock price below 30 cents, Bailey is using this hollowed-out tool to swallow his private empire at terms agreed upon when the stock was a hundred times higher. The initial KindlyMD merger was the Trojan horse, and the acquisition of BTC Inc was the real payload.

Bailey told us from the start. In the initial press release, he said Nakamoto would acquire BTC Inc, subject to audit and call option exercise. The MSA was publicly filed, and the option terms were disclosed. Everything was legally compliant and fully transparent—just like all complex financial engineering, the truth was buried in piles of documents no one would read.

The person who operates Bitcoin Magazine, organizes the world's largest Bitcoin conference, and positions himself as a leader of the Bitcoin movement, built a public company, destroyed 99% of shareholder value, and is now using it to acquire his own businesses at a premium.

He once compared himself to the Medicis. At least the Medicis created value for Florence before taking their cut.

Nakamoto is the freak show that happens when influencer culture meets the public stock market.

Exit Liquidity

David Bailey raised $710 million from over 200 investors across six continents. He promised them a future like the Morgans, Medicis, and Rothschilds, a financial dynasty built on Bitcoin. He told them Nakamoto would bring Bitcoin to the center of global capital markets. He said their names would echo through history.

But he delivered a 99% loss.

He priced the PIPE at $1.12 while retail bought at $28. He embedded call options to acquire his own companies into the filings without shareholders understanding what they were authorizing. He rotated three lenders in a week to prevent $200 million in debt from crushing equity, accumulating $14 million in debt extinguishment losses along the way. He sold Bitcoin at a loss from the treasury that was supposed to only accumulate, not sell. He couldn't even submit quarterly financial reports on time. And when the stock price finally fell to 29 cents...

When the rubble was cleared and the retail investors who trusted him were wiped out, he exercised that call option, using the wreckage of their investment to buy his private empire at four times the market price.

Bailey holds 11 million shares at a cost of $1.12. Adam Back holds nearly 9 million shares. Balaji, Lopp, Yusko, Salinas, Jihan Wu—they all got in at a price that teachers, truck drivers, or first-time investors could never access. These are the people who shape the Bitcoin narrative. They run conferences, publish magazines, manage funds, post tweets. They are the supply chain of belief, turning skeptics into believers and believers into bag holders.

Now, Bailey owns Bitcoin Magazine, the Bitcoin Conference, and a hedge fund, all packed into a public company with a market cap only a fraction of its Bitcoin holdings, all acquired with stock priced four times the market value, all approved before a single cent from retail entered.

And he's not done.

Nakamoto has already filed with the SEC for a $5 billion ATM (At-the-Market) stock offering. Bailey now controls the media division, the conference division, the hedge fund, and a shelf registration that allows him to keep issuing stock collateralized by the Bitcoin treasury until the last bit of value is squeezed out.

When exactly did the Bitcoin community hand the keys to conference promoters and influencer capitalists? And why is anyone surprised when they drive away with the car?

Related Questions

QWhat was the key mechanism David Bailey used to acquire his private companies at a premium using the struggling Nakamoto Holdings stock?

AHe utilized a call option embedded in the original marketing services agreement, which was approved by shareholders when the stock price was high, allowing the acquisition at $1.12 per share despite the market price collapsing to $0.29.

QHow did the PIPE investors benefit from the retail investors in the Nakamoto Holdings deal?

APIPE investors, including prominent Bitcoin figures, acquired shares at $1.12, while retail investors bought in at prices 20 to 30 times higher, around $28 to $31, creating a massive information asymmetry from the start.

QWhat was the consequences of Nakamoto's stock price falling below $1 for an extended period?

AThe company received a delisting notice from Nasdaq, threatening its ability to conduct ATM offerings, issue convertible notes, or use its stock as acquisition currency, which was crucial for Bailey's plans.

QWhat financial maneuvers did Nakamoto employ to manage its $200 million debt as the stock price collapsed?

AThe company rapidly cycled through lenders, first replacing a convertible note with a term loan, then a 30-day bridge loan, and finally a loan from Kraken secured by 150% over-collateralization of its Bitcoin treasury, accruing significant losses in the process.

QHow did David Bailey structure the acquisition to avoid additional shareholder approval for buying his own companies?

AThe call option for the acquisition was pre-approved by shareholders in the initial merger documents when the stock was highly valued, so no further vote was required when the deal was executed after the price crash.

Related Reads

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片