The CLARITY Act Enters a Critical Review Today: What You Should Focus On?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-14Last updated on 2026-05-14

Abstract

The CLARITY Act (Digital Asset Market Clarity Act), a landmark bill to establish a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, enters a crucial committee markup in the U.S. Senate Banking Committee. While it has a significant chance of advancing to a full Senate vote, its path is narrowing with over 130 proposed amendments. Key tensions surround the bill: whether stablecoin rewards constitute unfair competition for bank deposits, if the legislation genuinely protects investors or merely enables industry expansion, and the push from Democrats to include ethics provisions related to the Trump family's crypto dealings. Banking lobbyists strongly oppose the stablecoin reward compromise, and with the summer recess and midterm elections approaching, the window for passage is tightening. Prediction markets currently assign about a 60% probability of the bill becoming law this year.

Editor's Note: On May 14th, at 10:30 AM Eastern Time (10:30 PM Beijing Time) today, the U.S. Senate Banking Committee will conduct a committee review of the "Cryptocurrency Market Structure Act" (known as the CLARITY Act). This is a critical step in the legislative process. If passed, the CLARITY Act will advance to a full Senate vote.

The committee's official website shows that this Executive Session has been scheduled on the agenda. Previously, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott, along with Cynthia Lummis and Thom Tillis, released the latest version of the market structure bill text on May 12th. They stated its goal is to provide "clear rules" for digital assets, protect ordinary investors, combat illicit financial activities, and keep financial innovation within the United States.

This article is from Fortune, focusing on the political maneuvers on the eve of the CLARITY Act's review by the Senate Banking Committee. The most noteworthy aspect is not whether the bill is "pro-crypto," but how, as it nears passage, it exposes three key tensions in U.S. crypto regulation: First, whether stablecoin yields are payment incentives or de facto deposit competition; Second, whether the crypto market structure legislation is protecting investors or opening an institutional pathway for industry expansion; Third, given the deep involvement of the Trump family in crypto businesses, whether ethical constraints must be simultaneously incorporated into the market structure reforms.

From the current situation, the CLARITY Act still has a relatively good chance of entering a full Senate vote, but its margin for error is narrowing. Fortune reports that members of the Senate Banking Committee have already submitted over 130 amendments before the review, with Elizabeth Warren alone proposing 44. Meanwhile, the banking industry is concerned that stablecoin reward mechanisms could siphon off bank deposits and has sent a large number of opposition letters to Senate offices.

Although the key Republican swing vote John Kennedy has indicated a tendency to support it, and the chance of the bill entering full Senate consideration remains high, with the summer recess and midterm elections approaching, the window for the CLARITY Act's passage is narrowing. Prediction markets have also lowered its probability of passing this year to about 60%.

Below is the original text:

The CLARITY Act is a landmark bill aimed at establishing a regulatory framework for the U.S. crypto industry. The bill will begin its markup review process in a Senate committee starting Thursday. Its passing prospects have boosted investor sentiment, but there remain several significant hurdles to cross before Congress can send the bill to President Trump's desk.

CLARITY is short for the "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act." The bill passed the House of Representatives last year but encountered resistance in the Senate Banking Committee due to disputes between banks and stablecoin companies over whether and when rewards can be paid on stablecoin balances. Now, as senators prepare to propose amendments, Democrats are pushing to include ethical constraint clauses related to the Trump family's crypto businesses.

According to a copy of proposed amendments reviewed by Fortune, members of the Senate Banking Committee have submitted over 130 proposed amendments ahead of Thursday's markup, with Senator Elizabeth Warren alone submitting 44.

Some of the proposed amendments are minor, but others aim to advance the positions of the bill's opponents. These opponents include banking interests concerned that stablecoins could weaken the deposit base of banks, as well as those worried about ethical and national security risks accompanying the crypto industry's expansion.

"I think it will pass, based on the progress made in both chambers of Congress so far and the White House's support for this bill," Steve Yelderman, general counsel for the Ethereum-focused initiative Etherealize, told Fortune. "Having said that, this is Washington, and anything can happen."

Earlier this year, the CLARITY Act came close to entering a Senate Banking Committee markup, but Coinbase withdrew its support for the bill over a proposed ban on stablecoin rewards. Since then, Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Senator Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) reached an agreement on the stablecoin yield issue. However, banking lobbying groups now complain that this compromise is too friendly to stablecoin companies. Reportedly, members of the American Bankers Association have sent over 8,000 letters to Senate offices criticizing this yield compromise.

A Senate aide told Fortune that during tomorrow's markup, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-S.C.) is expected to emphasize protecting "ordinary people," safeguarding national security, and keeping crypto innovation in the United States as the main goals of the CLARITY Act. Another Senate aide said Democrats are expected to focus on the ethical issues raised by President Trump's numerous crypto connections.

"Democrats are increasingly concerned that if ethics provisions are not included in the version of the bill marked up by the Banking Committee, they may not be included later," the staffer said. They added that Democrats are focused on addressing the issue of the Trump family profiting from cryptocurrencies within the market structure legislation. Republicans and Democrats have met several times this week to discuss how to add ethics clauses to the CLARITY Act.

For now, the bill's chances of reaching a full Senate vote remain significant. A key Republican who had previously been hesitant about the CLARITY Act in the Banking Committee, Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana, told Semafor he plans to support the bill. However, with the summer recess and midterm elections approaching, the margin for error for the CLARITY Act remains quite limited. Traders on Polymarket have become less optimistic about the bill's prospects this week. The prediction market currently puts the probability of the bill passing this year at 60%.

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinist50m ago

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinist50m ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit50m ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit50m ago

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbit54m ago

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbit54m ago

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbit1h ago

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbit1h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit2h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot