# Market Structure Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Market Structure", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

BTC Price Forecast: BTC Bulls Regain Control as Brandt Supports Breakout Above $81K

Bitcoin is consolidating near the $80,000 level as bulls defend key technical levels and leverage returns to the market. After a strong rally, BTC faces significant resistance around $81,255. A decisive close above this level could confirm renewed upward momentum and open a path toward $83,000 and possibly $85,000. Trader Peter Brandt has shifted his technical view, now holding a long Bitcoin position following the completion of an inverse head-and-shoulders pattern. The four-hour chart shows a solid bullish structure, with Bitcoin trading above its key Exponential Moving Averages (20, 50, 100, 200-period). Immediate support is seen at the 20 EMA near $79,084, followed by $77,283 and $76,515. Market data shows a recovery in Bitcoin's open interest, rising to $56.48 billion, indicating traders are re-establishing leveraged positions alongside the price recovery. However, this also increases liquidation risks during sharp reversals. Spot flows have been inconsistent, with a recent moderate net inflow of $17.73 million on August 28, but lacking signs of aggressive accumulation. The September outlook hinges on whether buyers can defend the $79,084 support while gathering enough momentum to break the $81,255 resistance. The bullish EMA structure favors buyers, but a confirmed breakout above $81,255 is seen as critical for the next major leg up. Failure to hold $79,084 could trigger pullbacks toward $77,283 and $76,515.

cryptonews.ru08/28 13:16

BTC Price Forecast: BTC Bulls Regain Control as Brandt Supports Breakout Above $81K

cryptonews.ru08/28 13:16

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

Hyperliquid’s Compliance Path: From Permissionless to Permissioned HIP-3 Hyperliquid currently blocks U.S. access because its permissionless, on-chain infrastructure conflicts with U.S. market structure laws, which restrict futures trading to registered exchanges, clearinghouses, and brokers. Through its Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), the project is advocating for regulatory modernization, proposing that regulated entities be allowed to build products on HyperCore (its exchange and clearing layer) while fulfilling their compliance obligations. The platform’s modular stack separates roles like a traditional exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and broker (FCM), but reconstructs them on-chain with code. This enables permissionless access, self-custody, and 24/7 global trading, but clashes with U.S. rules requiring KYC, specific margin models, and custodial arrangements. To resolve this, HPC is engaging with U.S. regulators (CFTC, SEC) to seek clarity that deploying on-chain software does not itself trigger licensing, and to establish exemptions allowing non-custodial wallets to route users to regulated derivatives. Recent political signals suggest openness to this approach. On the technical side, Hyperliquid Labs has introduced permissioned HIP-3 deployers on testnet. These allow regulated entities to launch markets, perform KYC, and whitelist compliant users. While these create separate order books, whitelisted market makers can bridge liquidity between them, ensuring deep, shared liquidity across the same L1. Features like payload-based “PA” permissions enable DEX-level account controls (e.g., reduce-only orders), mirroring traditional broker authorities. The strategy is not to open the native, permissionless front-end to U.S. users, but to position Hyperliquid as neutral infrastructure that U.S. regulated firms can use while meeting their legal duties. This paves a compliant path for U.S. investor access while preserving the protocol’s core, permissionless nature.

marsbit08/24 02:11

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

marsbit08/24 02:11

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

The article "Would RWA Still Matter Without DeFi?" argues that tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) alone, like putting a barcode on a container, is not transformative. True value emerges when these tokenized assets are integrated into decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, enabling valuation, financing, hedging, trading, and loss management in a programmable, automated manner. Tokenization provides digital representation, but DeFi provides utility through leverage, liquidity, and composability. The core challenge lies in aligning the different "time clocks" of blockchain (fast, 24/7), traditional markets (limited hours), and asset redemption (slow processes), which creates liquidation risks and gaps. Effective RWA integration requires more than a token; it needs a full stack: legally enforceable rights, reliable data oracles, clear transfer rules, executable secondary liquidity, appropriate collateral parameters, and credible loss resolution paths. Liquidity is defined not by total value locked (TVL) but by the ability to exit a position under stress within a required timeframe. Risk management for RWAs must be modeled as a dependency graph, monitoring interconnected nodes like issuers, custodians, oracles, and liquidity pools for early warning signs beyond just price data. While tokenized government bonds serve as an initial "ping test," the future lies in more complex assets like computing power and energy, which require bespoke risk models. Tokenized stocks paired with perpetual futures present a major test, combining global equity ownership with crypto-native leverage, necessitating robust architectural safeguards like isolation and dynamic collateral rules. The conclusion is that without DeFi, RWA tokenization offers limited value—improving distribution and transparency. The significant opportunity arises when tokenized assets become functional components within open, programmable capital markets, where they can be used as collateral and facilitate complex financial strategies. The token is merely the barcode; the market operating system is the real machine.

marsbit08/21 10:20

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

marsbit08/21 10:20

活动图片