# Jurisdiction Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Jurisdiction", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

US Calls for Restrictions on Sports Prediction Markets

The National Football League (NFL) has urged the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to tighten rules for prediction markets on sports events. In a July letter, the NFL argued that current proposals fail to adequately protect the integrity of games and market participants. Key demands include banning contracts on events easily manipulated by individuals (e.g., a kicker missing a field goal), clarifying definitions to prevent gambling-like contracts, and explicitly prohibiting trading based on non-public insider information. The league also called for restricted person lists, a ban on margin trading, advertising limits, stronger user protections, and a minimum age of 21. This push coincides with an ongoing jurisdictional dispute between the CFTC and several states. The CFTC claims exclusive federal oversight, classifying event contracts as swaps, while states argue these platforms violate local gambling laws. Recent legal actions in Michigan and Minnesota highlight the conflict, with a federal court temporarily blocking Minnesota from applying a new law to CFTC-registered platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket. Meanwhile, prediction markets are experiencing significant growth. In June, driven by events like the World Cup, Kalshi's trading volume exceeded $31 billion (85% from sports contracts), while Polymarket's global platform hit a monthly record of $10.8 billion. However, platforms face legal challenges, such as lawsuits from Kentucky accusing them of operating unlicensed sports betting disguised as prediction markets.

cryptonews.ru07/28 08:56

US Calls for Restrictions on Sports Prediction Markets

cryptonews.ru07/28 08:56

Tiger Research: Three Strategies for Financial Institutions to Keep Up with the Tokenization Wave

Tiger Research's in-depth report analyzes the strategic choices for financial institutions entering the rapidly growing Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization market. With the market projected to be worth $25-36 billion and a lack of complete regulatory frameworks in many jurisdictions, institutions face three options: waiting for domestic legislation, using regulatory sandboxes for limited experiments, or moving first into established overseas markets to gain a competitive edge. Tokenization is not magic; it requires meticulous preparation. Before entry, institutions must strategically plan across six core areas: choosing a jurisdiction, obtaining necessary licenses, defining the asset type, targeting the appropriate investor base, selecting settlement currencies, and designing operational requirements like custody and governance. The report outlines two main operational paths. The first is a direct jurisdictional path, establishing a legal presence in mature markets like Hong Kong, Singapore, or the U.S., often leveraging local licensed platforms to accelerate market entry. The second is a chain-native path, using platforms like Ondo or Plume that are built with regulatory compliance embedded, allowing for faster, more flexible market access without being tied to a specific jurisdiction. Ultimately, the report advises against waiting for perfect regulation. The preparation process can take 6-12 months and requires thorough legal review. Using the example of a mid-sized securities firm, it details steps from evaluating existing entities to final execution. The core message is that accumulating real-world operational experience is paramount, as the market is moving ahead and will not wait for latecomers.

Foresight News07/07 11:01

Tiger Research: Three Strategies for Financial Institutions to Keep Up with the Tokenization Wave

Foresight News07/07 11:01

Tiger Research: Take RWA Tokenization Overseas First

This article discusses the strategic choices facing financial institutions in jurisdictions lacking mature regulatory frameworks for Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization. With the market growing rapidly, institutions must choose between waiting for local legislation, using regulatory sandboxes, or—the recommended priority—expanding into overseas markets to gain early experience. Successfully launching cross-border RWA tokenization requires meticulous preparation across six key areas: establishing an overseas base (e.g., Hong Kong, Singapore, the U.S.), securing necessary licenses, defining the tokenized asset (with bonds being simpler than non-standard assets), defining the target investor scope, deciding on settlement currencies/payment flows, and designing operational requirements like custody and on-chain governance. The article outlines two primary strategic paths: a direct "onshore" path and a "native on-chain" path. The direct path involves setting up a legal entity and obtaining licenses in a mature jurisdiction like Hong Kong, Singapore, or the U.S., leveraging existing platforms (e.g., DigiFT, Securitize) for efficiency. The alternative native on-chain path involves partnering with compliant, decentralized platforms (e.g., Ondo, Plume Nest) that use structures like offshore SPVs to facilitate tokenization and access DeFi liquidity, offering speed and broader reach but with greater structural complexity. The core argument is that institutions should not wait for perfect domestic regulation. A detailed hypothetical case study illustrates the multi-step, 6-12 month process of launching an overseas tokenized bond. The key takeaway is that the essence of a tokenization business lies not in the technology but in successfully executing the entire sales and operational process. The market is moving forward, and the time to act is now.

marsbit07/07 07:52

Tiger Research: Take RWA Tokenization Overseas First

marsbit07/07 07:52

The Most Advanced Large Models Are Now Subject to Export Controls Like Enriched Uranium

In an unprecedented move mirroring the control of enriched uranium, the US Commerce Department has imposed an export control ban on Anthropic's advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, forcing their global shutdown. This marks the first time a purely digital entity—a set of neural network weights—has been subjected to such hardware-like strategic export restrictions, based not on physical scarcity but on its concentrated "capability density." The article draws a direct parallel to the historical control of nuclear technology, arguing that just as uranium ore becomes a controlled substance only when enriched to a critical threshold, AI capabilities become subject to regulation when compressed into a single, potent, and easily accessible interface. This "enriched AI" is seen as crossing a threshold where its aggregated power poses a potential threat. The author predicts three major consequences over the next decade. First, capability auditing will become institutionalized, with governments setting compliance checklists and thresholds for model power, triggering automatic export controls. Second, jurisdictional boundaries will blur as US export controls extend their reach globally, governing any user of American AI services regardless of location, forcing non-US entities to reconsider their AI supply chain dependencies. Third, a technological bifurcation will occur, splitting the AI landscape into a restricted, high-risk track of advanced US proprietary models and a more reliable track of open-source or locally developed alternatives, where guaranteed access may outweigh raw performance. The core crisis exposed is the lack of a legal property rights framework for AI "intelligence." While companies invest heavily in integrating these models into their production systems, legally they only purchase a service that can be revoked at any time, leaving them with no recourse for their sunk investments. The conclusion warns of a permanently fractured digital world where the most capable models may not be the most usable, and clear, unassailable ownership of technology will become paramount.

marsbit06/15 05:41

The Most Advanced Large Models Are Now Subject to Export Controls Like Enriched Uranium

marsbit06/15 05:41

活动图片