# Governance Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Governance", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

IOSG: After the Number of Developers Halved, Crypto Did Not Die

The crypto development community has undergone a significant transformation, with monthly active developers on GitHub halving from 45K in 2022 to approximately 23K by 2026. This decline is largely attributed to the departure of newcomers, whose roles were often tied to market-driven hype cycles like NFTs and forked DeFi protocols, leading to a 52% churn rate among those with less than a year of experience. However, the core of the industry has strengthened. Established developers with over two years of experience have reached a record high, contributing about 70% of the code. They are consolidating around ecosystems with genuine users and revenue, such as Bitcoin and Solana, while moving away from narrative-driven projects. The talent shift represents a "deleveraging" and an increase in core density. This core group has developed a unique skillset by operating in an environment of "code is law," with zero tolerance for error and no external recourse. They have learned to build trust and functional systems from the ground up without central authorities, as demonstrated by protocols like Uniswap and MakerDAO. These capabilities are now being repriced and leveraged in the AI era. The structural challenges of AI scaling—such as trust, coordination, and verification—mirror those long addressed in crypto. Examples include CoreWeave pivoting from GPU mining to AI compute, OpenSea's founder applying NFT market logic to AI model routing with OpenRouter, and projects like NEAR and Catena Labs transitioning crypto-native architectural and financial insights into AI infrastructure and agent banking. Key areas where crypto-bred skills are directly applicable to AI include: 1. **Compute Aggregation & Optimization**: Using token incentives and cryptographic verification (e.g., Proof of Sampling & Privacy) to create trusted, decentralized GPU networks, as seen with Hyperbolic. 2. **AI Governance & Incentive Design**: Applying economic mechanism design from DAOs and tokenomics to align the goals of multiple, fast-acting AI agents, a direction explored by EigenLayer's EigenCloud. 3. **AI Agent Autonomous Payments**: Leveraging stablecoins and programmable, permissionless blockchains to enable the micro-transactions required for AI agent economies, exemplified by protocols like x402. The role of the crypto builder is evolving from writing smart contracts to designing trust mechanisms for autonomous AI systems. This convergence is reflected in hiring trends at major firms and significant capital allocation from funds like Paradigm and a16z crypto, which are investing at the intersection of crypto and AI. Regional differences exist, with the US favoring foundational protocol innovation and Asia focusing on compliant application-layer integration, but the underlying trend is clear. The industry's "deleveraging" has not signaled its demise but rather a maturation, positioning its core builders to solve critical trust and coordination problems in the age of AI.

marsbit15h ago

IOSG: After the Number of Developers Halved, Crypto Did Not Die

marsbit15h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit05/16 05:08

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit05/16 05:08

Circle's Second Growth Curve: After the $222 Million ARC Financing, CRCL or ARC?

Circle, the issuer of USDC, announced that its new public blockchain Arc completed a $222 million private sale for its native token ARC, with the network's fully diluted valuation reaching $3 billion. The funding round was led by a16z crypto, with participation from major institutions including BlackRock, Apollo, and ICE. The article explains Circle's rationale for building its own L1 blockchain, Arc. Existing chains like Ethereum and Solana are seen as lacking native support for large-scale institutional needs, such as regulatory compliance, predictable transaction costs, and asset issuance/redemption workflows. Arc is designed to fill this gap as a foundational layer for the on-chain economy, moving beyond Circle's reliance on USDC reserve interest for revenue. It details the dual-token model of Arc: USDC serves as the stable gas token for predictable transactions, while ARC is the network's native asset used for staking in the planned transition to Proof-of-Stake, governance, and aligning long-term incentives among participants. ARC's total supply is 10 billion, with 60% allocated to ecosystem development, 25% to Circle, and 15% to a long-term reserve. All protocol fees are converted to ARC, with portions burned and distributed to stakers. The piece contrasts the value proposition of Circle's public stock (CRCL) and the ARC token. CRCL captures the company's core cash flows from USDC interest and other business lines. ARC captures the growth potential of the Arc network itself. While legally separate, network success benefits both: it drives USDC usage for Circle and increases the value of its 25% ARC holding. Finally, it outlines participation avenues for retail users, primarily through the Arc House community and testnet activities, while noting the competitive landscape with projects like Canton Network and Plasma. The article concludes that Arc's success hinges on attracting real institutional activity post-mainnet launch, scheduled for Summer 2026.

链捕手05/14 13:53

Circle's Second Growth Curve: After the $222 Million ARC Financing, CRCL or ARC?

链捕手05/14 13:53

活动图片