StarkWare tests quantum-resistant bitcoin transaction on the mainnet

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-27Last updated on 2026-08-27

Abstract

StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy has tested an experimental quantum-resistant Bitcoin transaction on the mainnet, which the company claims is the first of its kind. The transaction was confirmed in Bitcoin block 964,199. It spent an output secured by Levy's proposed Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB) scheme, which combines hash-based one-time signatures with computational search to tie authorization to a specific transaction, aiming to prevent forgery even if a quantum computer breaks Bitcoin's current elliptic-curve cryptography. While demonstrating that Bitcoin's existing consensus rules allow for one form of quantum-resistant spending without a protocol change, the method remains expensive. Creating the transaction cost an estimated $150-$200 and required several hours of GPU computation, classifying it as a last-resort measure. Furthermore, standard Bitcoin Core nodes would not relay such non-standard transactions, requiring direct submission via a mining pool's service. StarkWare's CEO emphasized that QSB is a temporary safety net, and a future soft-fork protocol upgrade will ultimately be necessary for broader quantum resistance. Bitcoin developers are separately considering proposals, such as BIP-360, which would introduce new output types and mitigate quantum vulnerabilities in existing Taproot spends.

StarkWare researcher Avihu Levy has tested an experimental quantum-resistant transaction on the Bitcoin mainnet — the company calls it the first of its kind.

According to StarkWare, the transaction was confirmed on Wednesday in Bitcoin block 964,199. On-chain data shows it spent an output of 10,000 satoshis protected by Levy's Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB) scheme; the block was mined by MARA Pool after receiving the transaction via its Slipstream service.

Levy's paper and code repository state that QSB combines hash-based one-time signatures with a computational search that ties authorization to a specific transaction. The design aims to prevent forgery even if a quantum computer breaks the elliptic curve cryptography used by Bitcoin.

The test moves Levy's April proposal from theory to an on-chain demonstration and shows that Bitcoin's existing consensus rules allow for one type of quantum-resistant spending without a protocol change.

Bitcoin's quantum-resistant method remains expensive

In March, Google researchers estimated that a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically derive a Bitcoin private key within nine to 12 minutes after its public key becomes visible. Google stated this could allow an attacker to replace a pending transaction within Bitcoin's confirmation window.

Levy then presented QSB in April, estimating at the time that creating a transaction would require $75 to $150 worth of GPU computations. He described it as an emergency measure, not a replacement for protocol-level safeguards.

A StarkWare spokesperson, Nathan Jeffay, told Cointelegraph that the completed transaction cost "several hundred dollars," estimating the expense at roughly $150–200. The StarkWare release states the computation took several hours.

Related: Banks and regulators join pilot for quantum-resistant crypto transfers

Levy's repository also classifies QSB transactions as non-standard under default Bitcoin Core relay policies. StarkWare said this is why regular nodes would not have relayed the transaction until it was confirmed, necessitating its direct transmission via the MARA Slipstream service.

QSB applies to individual Bitcoin transactions, rather than updating the cryptography for the entire network. "A soft fork will need to happen, and I believe it will," said StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson, adding that QSB serves as a safety net during the development of protocol-level protections.

Bitcoin developers are separately considering proposals, including BIP-360 — a proposed soft fork that would introduce a Pay-to-Merkle-Root output type while simultaneously removing the quantum-vulnerable key-path spend for Taproot.

Magazine: Demand absorption is the 'key question' as Bitcoin fails to reclaim $80K: Analysis

end-content

Related Questions

QWhat was tested and announced as a first-of-its-kind transaction by StarkWare's researcher in the Bitcoin mainnet?

AStarkWare researcher Avihu Levy tested an experimental quantum-resistant transaction in the Bitcoin mainnet, which the company called the first transaction of its kind.

QHow does the Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB) scheme, proposed by Avihu Levy, aim to protect Bitcoin transactions?

AThe QSB scheme combines hash-based one-time signatures with a computational search that ties authorization to a specific transaction. It is designed to prevent forgery even if a quantum computer breaks the elliptic curve cryptography used by Bitcoin.

QAccording to the article, what is a significant current drawback of using the QSB method for a Bitcoin transaction?

AA significant drawback is the high cost. The completed transaction cost several hundred dollars, estimated at around $150–$200, and the computations took several hours to complete.

QWhy was the QSB transaction sent directly through the MARA Slipstream service instead of being relayed through ordinary nodes?

ALevy's repository classifies QSB transactions as non-standard under Bitcoin Core's default relay policies. Therefore, ordinary nodes would not relay the transaction before it was confirmed, necessitating its direct submission through the MARA Slipstream service.

QWhat is the role of QSB in relation to potential future protocol-level changes for Bitcoin's quantum security, according to StarkWare's CEO?

AStarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson stated that QSB serves as a safety net during the development of protocol-level protections. He believes a soft fork for quantum security will happen, but QSB provides interim protection for individual transactions.

Related Reads

The Analysts Who Accurately Predicted the Silver Crash: Bitcoin Has Peaked in the Short Term, May Experience an 'Ultimate Washout' Dropping to $40,000 Between September and October

CMT analyst AG Thorson analyzes recent market movements driven by the US Treasury's bond buyback announcement. The move pushed the US Dollar below its 200-day moving average, fueling a strong rally in precious metals (gold, silver, platinum), which are seen as having confirmed major mid-year lows. Miner stocks (GDX) have surged over 40% from their bottom and are expected to lead the sector, potentially hitting new all-time highs before the metals themselves. Bitcoin also saw a sharp spike due to the Treasury news and a pro-crypto White House event, triggering a record $3 billion in short liquidations. However, Thorson maintains a cautious outlook for BTC. While admitting his confidence is wavering due to Bitcoin's reclaim of the 200-day MA, he still anticipates a potential final "washout" decline in September, possibly testing the $40,000 area (near the Bitcoin Equilibrium Price of $39,880) by October. He argues such a move is needed to shake out remaining bullish sentiment. If this drop does not materialize by September, his timing for a cycle bottom may be off by roughly three months. In summary, the analyst is bullish on precious metals and miners post their mid-year lows but remains watchful for one last significant dip in Bitcoin before a potential sustained upward move.

marsbit15m ago

The Analysts Who Accurately Predicted the Silver Crash: Bitcoin Has Peaked in the Short Term, May Experience an 'Ultimate Washout' Dropping to $40,000 Between September and October

marsbit15m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片