Solana transfers $650B in stablecoins – Liquidity flows away from Ethereum

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-09Last updated on 2026-03-09

Abstract

Stablecoin transaction volumes have grown significantly, with combined monthly flows regularly approaching $700 billion in late 2024 and early 2025, led by Ethereum and Tron. However, a structural shift occurred in 2025 as Solana's low fees and high throughput attracted increasing settlement activity. By February, Solana processed approximately $650 billion in stablecoin transfers, surpassing other networks. This growth reflects stablecoins' evolution from trading instruments to core operational infrastructure for payments, DeFi, and institutional use. Global stablecoin volume reached around $1.8 trillion, underscoring deeper integration into digital finance as the primary settlement layer.

Stablecoin transaction flows have expanded rapidly across major blockchains, reflecting growing demand for digital dollar settlement.

As adoption expanded, activity accelerated through late 2024 and early 2025.

Combined monthly volumes regularly approached $700 billion, led primarily by Ethereum [ETH] and Tron [TRX].

However, the structure began shifting during 2025 as Solana’s [SOL] settlement activity increased steadily. Low fees and high throughput encouraged payment flows and trading pairs to migrate toward faster rails.

Momentum intensified toward the end of 2025, when aggregate stablecoin volumes neared $1 trillion monthly. At this stage, Solana’s share expanded rapidly alongside rising on-chain commerce.

The trend culminated in February, when Solana processed roughly $650 billion in stablecoin transactions, surpassing competing networks.

Together, rising settlement volumes suggest stablecoins are increasingly functioning as operational payment infrastructure rather than purely trading liquidity.

Stablecoins emerge as crypto’s primary settlement layer

The surge in stablecoin settlement provides critical context for the transaction growth observed across blockchain networks.

Over the past two years, stablecoins have evolved from trading instruments into operational liquidity for payments, trading, and treasury management.

This shift appears clearly in transaction flows. During early 2024, adjusted stablecoin transfers ranged between $300 billion and $500 billion monthly.

As financial use cases expanded, activity accelerated through 2025, frequently approaching $1 trillion per month.

By February, global stablecoin volume reached roughly $1.8 trillion, signaling deeper financial integration.

Several forces drive this expansion. Exchanges increasingly route liquidity through USDC and USDT pairs, while DeFi protocols rely on stablecoins for collateral and settlement.

Meanwhile, institutional infrastructure reinforces these flows. Visa expanded USDC settlement to U.S. banks, allowing regulated institutions to process blockchain-based dollar transfers.

For markets and participants, this implies stablecoins are becoming the default monetary layer for digital finance, shaping liquidity flows, trading structure, and cross-platform capital movement.

Stablecoin activity tests post-surge durability

Related Questions

QWhich blockchain processed approximately $650 billion in stablecoin transactions in February, surpassing other networks?

ASolana (SOL) processed roughly $650 billion in stablecoin transactions in February.

QWhat are the two primary factors that encouraged payment flows and trading pairs to migrate to Solana?

ALow fees and high throughput encouraged payment flows and trading pairs to migrate toward Solana.

QWhat major shift in the function of stablecoins is indicated by the rising settlement volumes?

AThe rising settlement volumes suggest stablecoins are increasingly functioning as operational payment infrastructure for payments, trading, and treasury management, rather than purely as trading instruments.

QWhat was the approximate total stablecoin volume reached globally by February, as mentioned in the article?

AGlobal stablecoin volume reached roughly $1.8 trillion by February.

QHow did Visa's expansion of USDC settlement contribute to the stablecoin ecosystem?

AVisa expanded USDC settlement to U.S. banks, allowing regulated institutions to process blockchain-based dollar transfers, which reinforced institutional infrastructure and stablecoin flows.

Related Reads

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

Bitcoin recently surpassed $78,000, reigniting bullish sentiment and expectations of reaching six figures. However, analyst Behdark warns of a potential price crash before any sustained recovery. He suggests current optimism may be misleading, possibly a tactic by market makers to attract buyers before a downturn. Technical analysis indicates bearish patterns, such as a triangle or diamagnetic formation, signaling a likely decline. Key resistance levels to watch are $77,000 and $80,552, where a reversal may occur. If a correction happens, support levels are identified near $72,800, $67,885, and $67,677, with a break below possibly leading to a further 10% drop. The long-term outlook remains above the $60,000 cycle support, suggesting eventual recovery after a short-term dip.

bitcoinist1h ago

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

bitcoinist1h ago

Prediction Markets Under Bias

The article "Prediction Markets Under Bias" by Jeff Park of Bitwise argues against the common media portrayal of prediction markets as mere gambling or a social ill. It distinguishes between gambling and investment based on whether a participant's strategy has a positive expected value (+EV), not the market's structure. The author contends that prediction markets, like poker, are skill-based and can be a legitimate form of investment, offering individuals autonomy, truth discovery, and decentralized value. The piece critiques the common conflation of prediction markets with casino gambling, highlighting their role in risk hedging and capital efficiency, similar to insurance and securitization. A key differentiator is their precision and finite expiration, which makes prices directly anchor to factual outcomes, rewarding deep research and information advantage rather than punishing the uninformed. The author concludes that media opposition often stems from a structural bias, as these markets challenge traditional information gatekeepers and promote a more democratic, transparent system for pricing truth. The real debate is not about information having a price, but about who controls and profits from it.

marsbit1h ago

Prediction Markets Under Bias

marsbit1h ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit2h ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit2h ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit2h ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit2h ago

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

Kevin Warsh, a nominee for the Federal Reserve chair, faces a challenging confirmation hearing amid political pressure from former President Donald Trump to implement immediate and significant interest rate cuts. Warsh has proposed reforms including reducing the Fed’s communication frequency and shrinking its $6.7 trillion balance sheet. However, market expectations for rate cuts remain limited, creating tension with Trump’s demands. Warsh’s stance has shifted over time, from hawkish during the financial crisis to more dovish recently, citing AI-driven productivity gains. His confirmation is further complicated by Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s threat to block the nomination unless an investigation into current Chair Jerome Powell is dropped. Trump has warned of firing Powell if he doesn’t leave on time. Observers note that Warsh risks becoming a "scapegoat"—either by yielding to political pressure and fueling inflation, or by resisting and facing Trump’s backlash. His ties to Trump’s circle and Wall Street support may aid his nomination, but his ability to balance political demands with the Fed’s credibility remains uncertain. Historical precedents, like Arthur Burns’s compliance with Nixon, highlight the risks of political interference in monetary policy.

marsbit2h ago

Warsh, Trump's Next 'Scapegoat' at the Federal Reserve?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions