Polymarket Acquires Brahma to Strengthen DeFi Infrastructure

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-19Last updated on 2026-03-19

Abstract

Polymarket, the largest prediction market, has acquired DeFi infrastructure provider Brahma. The Brahma team will focus on enhancing Polymarket's product suite, aiming to reduce friction in wallet creation, deposits, and token redemptions. The acquisition is expected to bring more liquidity to niche prediction markets on Polymarket. Brahma’s three main products—Strategy Vaults, Brahma Accounts, and Swype.fun—will be discontinued over the next 30 days. This move is part of Polymarket’s continued expansion despite broader crypto market challenges. The company recently announced partnerships with Palantir and TWG AI for an AI-powered sports integrity platform and acquired Dome and Lunch in February. Financial terms of the Brahma acquisition were not disclosed.

The largest prediction market, Polymarket, has publicised that it is acquiring Brahma, a crypto startup offering decentralised finance (DeFi) infrastructure. As per the announcement on March 18, Brahma mentioned that as part of this transition, our team will commit itself to evolving Polymarket’s stack and product suite.

Brahma was rolled out in 2021, and till now it has processed more than $1 billion in volume and may be used by Polymarket to suppress friction around wallet creation, deposits, and token redemptions.

The possession could also draw more liquidity to niche, low-volume prediction markets on Polymarket. The founder and the chief executive officer of Polymarket, Shayne Coplan, mentioned that creating trustworthy infrastructure over blockchain networks and traditional financial rails is hard and there are no shortcuts.

He further went on to add that the Brahma team has signified it can design, function and scale complex products for sophisticated users. Financial details of the possession were not revealed at the time.

The Products of Brahma

In the last four years, Brahma has made three main products: Strategy Vaults for automated DeFi strategies, Brahma Accounts, smart accounts for DeFi users; and Swype.fun, a Visa card associated with DeFi positions for real-world spending.

The company mentioned that each product will be terminated over the upcoming 30 days as the acquisition proceeds. Polymarket has swiftly grown to a listed $20 billion valuation at the time of rapid growth in prediction markets.

Polymarket has carried on to invest in expansion regardless of a wider crypto market slip and an increase in interest in AI. The firm publicised on March 10 that it was collaborating with Palantir Technologies and TWG AI to create an AI-powered sports integrity platform.

It also acquired Y Combinator-supported Dome in February, which offers developer tools for prediction markets, and Lunch, a boutique company specialising in recruiting and assembling teams for tech startups.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Crypto Prices Retreat, Asian Markets Move the Same Way

TagsDeFiPolymarketprediction market

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of Polymarket's acquisition of Brahma?

APolymarket is acquiring Brahma to strengthen its DeFi infrastructure, specifically to evolve its stack and product suite, and to reduce friction around wallet creation, deposits, and token redemptions.

QHow much transaction volume has Brahma processed since its launch in 2021?

ABrahma has processed more than $1 billion in volume since it was launched in 2021.

QWhat are the three main products developed by Brahma in the last four years?

ABrahma's three main products are Strategy Vaults for automated DeFi strategies, Brahma Accounts (smart accounts for DeFi users), and Swype.fun, a Visa card linked to DeFi positions for real-world spending.

QWhat was the valuation of Polymarket at the time of the article, and what market trend contributed to this?

APolymarket had grown to a listed $20 billion valuation at the time, driven by rapid growth in prediction markets.

QBesides Brahma, what other companies has Polymarket recently acquired?

AIn February, Polymarket also acquired Dome, which offers developer tools for prediction markets, and Lunch, a boutique company specializing in recruiting and assembling teams for tech startups.

Related Reads

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit12m ago

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit12m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit32m ago

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit32m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit40m ago

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片