Pi Network Token Slides as Trade Tensions and Unlocks Pressure Price

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-19Last updated on 2026-01-19

Abstract

Pi Network's native token, PI, declined sharply, approaching its October all-time low due to increased US-EU trade tensions and significant daily token unlocks. The price dropped roughly 8-9% in 24 hours to around $0.178. Geopolitical uncertainty escalated after the US announced new tariffs targeting eight countries, prompting an emergency EU meeting. Reports indicate French President Macron called for a "trade bazooka" against US market access. Additionally, over 4.6 million tokens are being released daily, creating substantial selling pressure as investors gain access to previously locked coins. The token, which missed the January crypto rally, remains highly volatile amid these combined pressures.

The PI token of Pi Network fell toward its October low as US-EU trade tensions increased and more than 4.6 million daily unlocks ignited increasing selling pressure. The native token has fallen heavily over a 12-hour period, going near its October all-time low after weeks of price inactivity, as per the market data.

At the time of writing, PI is hovering about 0.178 USD, down about 8-9% in the past 24 hours. The fall of the token coincides with wider market unpredictability ignited by increasing trade tensions between the United States and the European Union.

The President of the United States publicised a new set of tariffs against 8 countries as part of efforts to buy Greenland from Denmark, as per the official statements. The European Union replied by setting an emergency meeting.

The Volatility Faced by Pi Token

The President of France, Emmanuel Macron, asked for the union to position a “trade bazooka” that would substantially limit U.S. access to European markets, as per the report. In the beginning, the crypto market became stable as these geopolitical developments opened out but did not agree when Asian stock markets and futures opened, market data showed.

The Pi token, which had been influenced by volatility at the time of the last market fluctuations, faced potential losses at the time of this episode. The token was not a part of the January rally when the price of Bitcoin increased and a number of altcoins showed double-digit percentage gains, as per the price data.

The schedule of token unlock may show price instability, as per the industry analysts. The PiScanUnlock data reveals that the average number of daily token unlocks surpassed 4.6 million, which could create selling pressure as investors get access to the last locked coins. The Pi Network attained its previous all-time low in October, as per historical price records.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Canaan Risks Nasdaq Delisting as Shares Slip Below $1 Again

TagsCryptoPiPi Network

Related Questions

QWhat are the main factors contributing to the decline of Pi Network's token price?

AThe decline is attributed to increasing US-EU trade tensions and over 4.6 million daily token unlocks creating significant selling pressure.

QWhat was the price of PI token at the time of writing and how much did it drop in 24 hours?

AAt the time of writing, PI token was hovering around $0.178, down approximately 8-9% in the past 24 hours.

QHow did the European Union respond to the new US tariffs announced against 8 countries?

AThe European Union responded by setting an emergency meeting to address the new tariffs.

QWhat specific measure did French President Emmanuel Macron propose regarding US-European trade relations?

AEmmanuel Macron asked the European Union to position a 'trade bazooka' that would substantially limit U.S. access to European markets.

QHow many daily token unlocks were occurring according to PiScanUnlock data, and what concern does this raise?

APiScanUnlock data revealed that average daily token unlocks surpassed 4.6 million, which could create selling pressure as investors gain access to previously locked coins.

Related Reads

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbit17m ago

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbit17m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbit32m ago

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片