Pi Network Introduces PiRC1 Token Framework for Mainnet Ecosystem

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-23Last updated on 2026-02-23

Abstract

Pi Network has introduced the PiRC1 token framework, a new utility-oriented standard for creating and managing tokens within its Mainnet ecosystem. This framework provides structured guidelines for token issuance, distribution, and emission logic, aiming to support real-world applications and services. A key feature is that funds from token launches will be directed to liquidity pools rather than project teams, enhancing trade stability. The proposal is open for community feedback on GitHub, reflecting Pi Network’s focus on community-driven governance. The move is expected to attract more developers and provide competitive advantages by offering clear operational parameters. This development coincides with significant Mainnet growth, including millions of users completing identity verification.

The Pi Network has rolled out a new utility-oriented token design framework for the Mainnet ecosystem, which highlights structured standards for the launch of future tokens. The move is a breakthrough for the network as it continues to develop its Open Network phase. Through the establishment of token standards, Pi Network aims to offer developers a clear guideline on how to create tokens within the ecosystem.

Structured Token Standards and Emission Logic

The PiRC1 document describes guidelines for token creation, management, and distribution patterns in the ecosystem. The guidelines focus on real-world applications rather than hypothetical scenarios, promoting tokens that enable applications and services running on Mainnet. As per the design published, the ecosystem tokens would co-exist with the native Pi coin, enabling decentralized applications and digital commerce. The design specifies the emission logic to inject the tokens into the system in a structured fashion.

The document also outlines ways that are expected to facilitate liquidity creation. According to the proposed structure, funds raised from the launch of ecosystem tokens would go into liquidity pools and not directly to project teams. This is expected to improve the stability of trade flows and eliminate structural uncertainties.

Developers expected to implement the proposal can examine the technical details and offer comments before final implementation. Pi Network has published the framework publicly on GitHub to allow community members to contribute to its improvement.

Community Engagement and Ecosystem Development

The proposal has been framed by Pi Network as part of a larger initiative to promote community-driven governance and development. Members of the community can access the document and provide feedback during the feedback period. Industry analysts have pointed out that well-defined token standards can help remove confusion for developers working on blockchain networks. Well-structured supply dynamics and rules for token emissions can also help improve clarity for participants in the ecosystem.

The announcement comes at a time when Pi Network is celebrating the growth of its Mainnet ecosystem. Millions of users have completed identity verification and switched over to Mainnet, and developers are working on applications in the network environment.

Experts believe that standardized token frameworks could assist in attracting more developers with clearer operating parameters. The standardized design of tokens could also give the ecosystem a competitive edge over projects that do not have standardized guidelines. The Pi Network has not set a final timeline for implementation, as the proposal is still open for community feedback.

Highlighted Crypto News:

AI Automation Mishap Leads to $442K Memecoin Transfer on Solana

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News13m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News13m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit29m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit29m ago

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手41m ago

Mysterious Whale Bets $2.5 Billion on BTC Surpassing $72,000 by August, $70,000 Mark Becomes Key

An anonymous trader executed a large bullish spread on Deribit, buying 20,000 Bitcoin call options with a $70,000 strike price and simultaneously selling 20,000 calls with a $72,000 strike. The trade, with a notional value of $2.5 billion, expires on July 31st—just two days after the upcoming Federal Reserve policy meeting. This structure positions for Bitcoin's price to rise above $70,000 by expiry, capping gains at $72,000. Bitcoin currently trades around $64,289, requiring a roughly 9% surge to reach the lower strike. The trade faces immediate obstacles, including key on-chain resistance near $69,000 and volatile inflows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, which have seen recent large daily outflows. Market predictions provide contrasting context, with some institutional analyses setting short-term support levels as low as $58,000-$59,000, while others maintain long-term bullish year-end targets. The outcome hinges on whether post-Fed demand can overcome these technical and ETF flow hurdles within the trade's brief 10-day window.

marsbit46m ago

Mysterious Whale Bets $2.5 Billion on BTC Surpassing $72,000 by August, $70,000 Mark Becomes Key

marsbit46m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbit56m ago

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard