Over 100 Illegal Mining Farms Found in the North Caucasus Since the Beginning of the Year

RBK-cryptoPublished on 2025-12-11Last updated on 2025-12-11

Abstract

Since the beginning of 2025, over 100 illegal cryptocurrency mining farms have been discovered in Russia's North Caucasus Federal District, according to "Rosseti Severny Kavkaz." The total financial damage from their operations is estimated at over 656 million rubles. Although cryptocurrency mining is officially banned in the region until Spring 2031, many illegal miners continue to operate by stealing electricity, either bypassing meters or connecting directly to the grid without contracts. The breakdown of discovered farms by region is as follows: 79 in Dagestan (causing 89.5 million rubles in damage), 14 in Ingushetia (455.5 million rubles), 5 in Karachay-Cherkessia (104.1 million rubles), 2 in Stavropol Krai (1 million rubles), 2 in North Ossetia (390,000 rubles), and 1 in Kabardino-Balkaria (5.8 million rubles). Dagestan leads in the number of cases, which the energy company attributes to individuals attempting to generate profit without using their own funds for electricity. In response to the widespread issue, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak announced on December 8th that the government plans to establish both administrative and criminal liability for violations related to cryptocurrency mining.

More than 100 illegal mining farms have been identified since the beginning of 2025 in the North Caucasus Federal District, according to the company "Rosseti Severny Kavkaz" (Russian Grids of the North Caucasus) as cited by TASS. The total amount of damage exceeded 656 million rubles.

Cryptocurrency mining is prohibited in the republics of the North Caucasus until the spring of 2031. However, many illegal miners remain in the regions, stealing electricity by bypassing meters or connecting to the grid directly without contracts.

5 underground farms were discovered in Karachay-Cherkessia (damage of 104.1 million rubles), two in the Stavropol Territory (1 million rubles) and North Ossetia (390 thousand rubles), and one more in Kabardino-Balkaria (5.8 million rubles).

The most significant damage to energy companies was caused by 14 farms in Ingushetia — 455.5 million rubles. The largest number of illegal miners was identified in Dagestan. There, 79 farms were found, which caused damage amounting to 89.5 million rubles.

"Dagestan still leads in the number of illegal mining cases. This is related to attempts by certain citizens to profit without using their own funds," the energy company reported.

On December 8, at a meeting of the Council for Strategic Development and National Projects, Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak stated that the government plans to establish both administrative and criminal liability for violations related to cryptocurrency mining. Lawyers told "RBC-Crypto" where the line between administrative and criminal offenses in the field of mining might be drawn.

In Belarus, reasons for blocking crypto exchange websites have been named. What is known.

Bitcoin mining difficulty has fallen for the third time in a row. What this indicates.

The Central Bank has proposed limiting ordinary Russians' right to purchase cryptocurrency.

Related Questions

QHow many illegal mining farms were discovered in the North Caucasus since the beginning of 2025?

AMore than 100 illegal mining farms were discovered.

QWhat is the total amount of financial damage caused by these illegal mining operations?

AThe total financial damage amounted to more than 656 million rubles.

QUntil when is cryptocurrency mining banned in the republics of the North Caucasus?

ACryptocurrency mining is banned until the spring of 2031.

QWhich Russian region suffered the most financial damage from these illegal mining farms?

AIngushetia suffered the most financial damage, with 14 farms causing 455.5 million rubles in damage.

QWhat did the Russian government plan to establish regarding cryptocurrency mining violations, as stated by Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak?

AThe government plans to establish both administrative and criminal liability for violations related to cryptocurrency mining.

Related Reads

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbit50m ago

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbit50m ago

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbit52m ago

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbit52m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片