OP Token Crashes to Record Low as Price Moves Below $0.13

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-20Last updated on 2026-02-20

Abstract

OP Token (OP) has crashed to a record low, falling over 9% in 24 hours to trade near $0.13 and hitting an all-time low of $0.1271. This represents a decline of over 97% from its all-time high of $4.85. Traders faced $2.23 million in liquidations, predominantly from long positions. Despite the price drop, open interest surged 25.34%, indicating high market activity. The decline is partly attributed to Base, a Layer 2 chain, moving away from the OP Stack, which weakens Optimism's Superchain vision. Technical analysis shows OP is deeply oversold with an RSI between 21-29, suggesting potential for a short-term bounce, but the MACD remains bearish. Key support is at $0.125, with resistance at $0.14.

Optimism Token (OP) has fallen more than 9% in the last 24 hours, now trading at nearly $0.13. With that, on February 20, it even hit an all-time low of $0.1271. This is a huge fall from its all-time high of $4.85 in March 2024, which is over 97% down.

According to the Coinglass derivatives data, Optimism traders faced $2.23 million in liquidation, with most of that coming from long positions, means who had bet the price would go up around $1.98 million in the last 24 hours. While the open interest data varies, which shows how many active trades are open, went up 25.34% in one day, showing the market is still very active.

With that, on February 18, Layer 2 chain, Base introduced a single unified stack called for accelerating upgrades and additional security, and it was planned to make public and open for contribution, as it is moving away from the OP Stack, but it assures that it would remain compatible with OP Stack standards.

As this shift from Base, which indicates a fundamental weakening of the Optimism’s Superchain vision, which is a grand idea to unite multiple Layer-2 chains under shared governance, shared security, unified governnace and revenue-sharing agreements.

OP Price Analysis

Optimism Token (OP) continues to trade near $0.13, after previously reaching around $1.40. The 24-hour trading volume has risen by approximately 7.79%, standing at $224.19 million, showing continued market activity despite the token’s decline.

With that, the immediate support for OP token lies at $0.125; if it breaks below, the OP token could fall deeper toward $0.110 – $0.100. On the reversal, the immediate resistance is seen at $0. 14, when the token breaks above this, the token could touch $0.16.

Analyzing through technical indicators, RSI is standing around the 21-29 range, which is a deeply oversold condition, which shows a chance for a short-term bounce, but if a token shows strong downtrends, it could stay below for longer periods, too. Also, the OP’s Moving Average Convergence and Divergence line is below zero, which indicates a clear bearish signal.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Bloomberg Intelligence Analyst Mike McGlone Has Revised BTC Price Prediction, but a Broader Concern Remains

TagsOPOptimism

Related Questions

QWhat is the current trading price of Optimism Token (OP) and how much has it fallen in the last 24 hours?

AThe Optimism Token (OP) is currently trading at nearly $0.13, having fallen more than 9% in the last 24 hours.

QWhat was the all-time low price for OP and when was it hit?

AOP hit an all-time low of $0.1271 on February 20.

QHow much did Optimism traders face in liquidations, and what type of positions made up the majority of these losses?

AOptimism traders faced $2.23 million in liquidations, with the majority (around $1.98 million) coming from long positions.

QWhat technical indicator suggests OP is in a deeply oversold condition, and what does this indicate?

AThe RSI (Relative Strength Index) is standing around the 21-29 range, which indicates a deeply oversold condition and suggests a chance for a short-term bounce.

QWhat recent development from Base indicates a potential weakening of Optimism's Superchain vision?

ABase introduced a new unified stack, moving away from the OP Stack, which indicates a fundamental weakening of Optimism’s Superchain vision of uniting multiple Layer-2 chains.

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit6m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit6m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit13m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit13m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit22m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit22m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit25m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit25m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit27m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片