Narrative Collapse, Trust Reset to Zero: Trove Kicks Off This Year's Crypto Rights Protection Campaign

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-19Last updated on 2026-01-19

Abstract

Trove, a Perp DEX platform that claimed to tokenize and trade illiquid collectibles like trading cards and luxury watches, has collapsed amid allegations of fraud and insider manipulation. The project initially built momentum with high-profile partnerships and a $20M+ HYPE token acquisition, leading to a successful $11.5M ICO. However, the team abruptly extended then reversed the ICO timeline, enabling insider betting on prediction markets like Polymarket. Soon after, Trove abandoned its original blockchain, Hyperliquid, and attempted to dump millions in HYPE tokens. Investigations revealed undisclosed payments to influencers, preferential investment terms for insiders, and false public statements. With trust shattered and legal risks under MiCA regulations mounting, Trove’s token is expected to crash at launch, marking a severe breach of trust in the crypto community.

Trove once had a perfect narrative.

As a Perp DEX targeting collectibles and RWA, Trove claimed to be able to transform illiquid "cultural assets," such as Pokémon cards, CSGO skins, and luxury items like high-end watches, into tradable financial assets, providing a hedging venue for collectors.

However, within just ten days, the Trove team staged a farce through a series of astonishing operations. In the process, they emptied the pockets of onlookers.

Bait

At the end of October last year, Trove founder @unwisecap discussed the concept of "Everything Can Be Perped" in several articles and announced that Trove would be built based on HIP-3, building up the community's anticipation.

Over the following month, Trove successively announced collaborations with Kalshi and CARDS (Collector_Crypt), receiving official Twitter replies as "endorsements" from these well-known project teams (P.S. As of the time of writing, Kalshi had already completed the "cutting off," deleting their reply under Trove's official tweet).

In mid-December, Trove announced that it had spent over $20 million to acquire 500,000 HYPE tokens to meet the integration requirements of HIP-3. Shortly after, the testnet points program was launched, and the trading volume on the platform exceeded $1 million within two weeks. Everything seemed to be progressing as expected. Until...

A Textbook Case of Insider Trading

On January 6th, Trove suddenly announced an ICO with a $20 million FDV. The public sale adopted an "oversubscription" model, offering priority allocation rights to points holders. Accompanied by concentrated promotions from a group of KOLs sporting Trove badges, Trove successfully raised $11.5 million, oversubscribed by 4.6 times.

At this point, with less than two hours left until the ICO deadline, the probability of the "Trove ICO total fundraising amount greater than $20 million" prediction market on Polymarket had approached zero.

The real show began shortly after. The team suddenly broke the rules, announcing an extension of the ICO by five days to ensure fair allocation. The "YES" option on Polymarket instantly skyrocketed from the bottom to nearly 60%. Insider funds were clearly a step ahead; on-chain data showed that specific wallets placed precise bets before the announcement was made and quickly exited after the price surge.

Perhaps deeming the liquidity of the prediction market insufficient to satisfy their appetite, and amidst a wave of community skepticism, the Trove team seized the opportunity to stage a dramatic "crying wolf" scenario: they announced the withdrawal of the extension decision, ending the ICO as originally planned.

Following this announcement, the corresponding market directly zeroed out and settled. Polymarket data indicated that related wallets had placed precise bets before the news was released and continued to profit from the subsequent reversal.

The Great Retreat

On January 17th, Trove suddenly announced it was abandoning Hyperliquid and would instead issue its token on Solana. For a project that had been fundraising under the banner of the Hyperliquid ecosystem, this was nothing short of pulling the rug out from under everyone.

Simultaneously, on-chain detective MLM caught the Trove team using a timed sell function, attempting to sell half of their HYPE tokens within 40 minutes.

Choosing to sell tens of millions worth of tokens in 40 minutes on a weekend, during the lowest trading volume, showed the Trove team was truly desperate.

Faced with质疑 (queries/doubt), the explanation provided by the Trove team seemed feeble: "The backers got nervous and decided to exit." However, on-chain transaction records showed these sell-offs were conducted simultaneously while the team was publicly denying "we are selling tokens."

This inconsistency between words and actions彻底击穿了 (completely shattered) the community's trust底线 (bottom line). As trust collapsed, more shady details were uncovered.

Renowned on-chain detective ZachXBT disclosed that the Trove team paid @TJRTrades a hefty marketing fee of $45,000, directly depositing it into the KOL's online gambling site top-up address.

KOL @hrithikk stated that the Trove team not only provided KOLs with substantial marketing fees but also privately offered ICO allocations at valuations as low as $8.5 million, a discount of up to 60%, accompanied by huge airdrop rewards. Trove is still selling shares at low prices and has contacted him over 5 times asking if he would invest in Trove.

Trove's TGE is scheduled for January 20th at 1:00 AM Beijing Time. The prediction market on Polymarket shows, based on the pre-sale valuation, a 90% probability that the TROVE token will fall below its issuance price.

The good news is that this farce might not end with a simple "Soft Rug." Trove had previously claimed on its official website to comply with EU MiCA regulations. Now, facing accusations of false advertising and potential fraud, angry investors have every reason to initiate civil lawsuits based on MiCA provisions.

The bad news is, as revealed in chat screenshots by a KOL, team members appear to be from Iran.

The Hyperliquid ecosystem is known for its strong community cohesion, but this atmosphere of abundant trust also provides fertile ground for scammers to thrive.

Related Questions

QWhat was Trove's original value proposition and narrative before its controversial actions?

ATrove was a Perp DEX for collectibles and RWA that claimed to convert illiquid 'cultural assets' like Pokémon cards, CSGO skins, and luxury watches into tradable financial assets, providing a hedging venue for collectors.

QWhat key event on January 6th marked the beginning of Trove's 'insider trading textbook' scandal?

AOn January 6th, Trove announced an ICO with a $20 million FDV using an 'oversubscription' model, but then suddenly extended the ICO by 5 days after it was nearly complete, allowing insiders to profit on prediction markets like Polymarket with prior knowledge.

QWhat action did Trove take on January 17th that completely shattered community trust and was described as 'pulling the rug from the cauldron'?

AOn January 17th, Trove abruptly announced it was abandoning the Hyperliquid blockchain to issue its token on Solana instead, despite having fundraised under the Hyperliquid ecosystem, and was caught attempting to dump its HYPE tokens in a short time frame.

QAccording to on-chain detectives, what evidence exposed Trove's unethical practices regarding influencer marketing and private allocations?

AZachXBT revealed Trove paid a KOL $45,000 for marketing to a gambling site deposit address, and KOL @hrithikk disclosed that the team offered private ICO allocations at a 60% discount ($8.5M valuation vs. public $20M) with massive airdrop bonuses.

QWhat potential legal repercussions does Trove face according to the article, and what complicating factor was mentioned?

AInvestors could file civil lawsuits under EU's MiCA regulations for false advertising and potential fraud, but a complicating factor is that team members are allegedly from Iran, which may hinder legal action.

Related Reads

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit25m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit25m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手32m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手32m ago

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit1h ago

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit1h ago

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1h ago

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1h ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1h ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片