JPMorgan Closes the 'Financial Backdoor': Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Face Compliance Reshuffle

比推Published on 2025-12-29Last updated on 2025-12-29

Abstract

JPMorgan Chase has recently frozen accounts linked to at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups, Blindpay and Kontigo, highlighting the risks cryptocurrency transactions pose to banks. These startups, backed by Y Combinator, primarily served Latin American markets, including Venezuela—a region under U.S. sanctions. The bank’s a surge in disputed transactions, such as chargebacks and fraud claims, triggered the freezes. Checkbook, a payments partner that provided these firms virtual account access to JPMorgan, noted that the startups failed to adequately verify their end customers' identities or ensure transaction legitimacy. While JPMorgan stated the action wasn’t due to the nature of stablecoin businesses, the incident underscores broader regulatory concerns. U.S. and global authorities have warned that stablecoins are being used for money laundering, terrorism financing, and other illicit activities. Both affected startups abruptly tightened compliance measures or terminated high-risk clients after the account closures.

Written by: Michael Roddan, Yueqi Yang

Compiled by: Block Unicorn

Original Title: Stablecoin Startups Bring Trouble to JPMorgan


JPMorgan has recently frozen accounts used by at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups in recent months, highlighting the risks that cryptocurrency transactions pose to banks, which must understand the customers they do business with and the sources of their funds.

These stablecoin startups operate in Venezuela and other regions where sanctions or other restrictions pose legal risks to banks. One of the stablecoin startups once claimed that customers did not need identity verification before transactions. Another startup, after JPMorgan froze its account, suddenly terminated all customers from high-risk countries, according to the company's communication records with customers.

Stablecoins have surged in popularity overseas, especially in countries with unstable economies and currencies. Last summer, the U.S. passed a stablecoin bill, giving this type of cryptocurrency pegged to the U.S. dollar legal status.

Individuals and businesses use stablecoins to obtain U.S. dollars and make overseas remittances. They need to establish connections with U.S. banks to convert cryptocurrencies into U.S. dollars. However, banks are cautious, fearing penalties from regulators even during the Trump administration, which supported cryptocurrencies. Global and U.S. regulators and law enforcement agencies have stated that stablecoins have been used to fund terrorist organizations, launder money, and engage in other criminal activities.

JPMorgan froze the accounts of two startups invested in by venture capital firm Y Combinator—Blindpay and Kontigo—both primarily focused on the Latin American market. These two companies connected with JPMorgan through the digital payment company Checkbook, which is also supported by JPMorgan and other institutions.

Blindpay has processed over $100 million in transactions. In August of this year, the company began offering an account through JPMorgan aimed at helping customers overcome barriers to entering the U.S. financial system. Blindpay stated in a blog post at the time that obtaining loans from U.S. banks was 'much harder than imagined.'

Later that day, JPMorgan and Checkbook froze Blindpay's account. According to a series of now-deleted blog posts on the company's website, the stablecoin company quickly began strengthening anti-money laundering measures and customer verification. Blindpay did not respond to requests for comment.

Last year, Checkbook joined JPMorgan's payment partner network, enabling Checkbook to process payments for its customers through JPMorgan. For this purpose, Checkbook creates virtual accounts for its customers at JPMorgan.

Virtual accounts allow fintech companies like Checkbook to quickly open U.S. dollar-denominated accounts for overseas customers and business clients, avoiding situations where they cannot access the U.S. banking system for various reasons. Under U.S. law, businesses opening bank accounts in the U.S. must provide proof of their operations in the U.S. and a physical U.S. address.

Virtual accounts have become a popular service offered by stablecoin companies like Blindpay. Checkbook's accounts have opened a backdoor for these small stablecoin companies to enter the U.S. financial system. Soon after, JPMorgan noticed a sharp increase in the number of disputed transactions (i.e., refunds and chargebacks). Chargebacks can arise from fraud, unauthorized use, and billing errors, especially when cardholders report identity theft or dispute purchases. It is unclear why these companies experienced a surge in disputed transactions. JPMorgan has contacted Checkbook for an explanation.

Checkbook CEO PJ Gupta stated that companies like Blindpay and Kontigo were among the reasons for the rise in chargeback rates. Gupta pointed out that these companies need to ensure that transactions processed through their systems are legitimate and valid and verify the identities of remitting customers. Gupta also mentioned that while Checkbook conducts customer due diligence on the stablecoin companies themselves, due diligence on the customers is the responsibility of these companies.

Gupta stated that when disputed transactions exceed a certain threshold, Checkbook and JPMorgan freeze customer accounts. 'In such cases, we suspend operations and conduct an analysis until we obtain assurances. We send the assurances to the bank, and if both the bank and we agree that the issue will not recur, we can reopen the account. If we cannot reach an agreement, we will not reopen the account,' Gupta said.

Gupta mentioned that transactions from stablecoin companies account for only a small portion of Checkbook's total transaction volume, which exceeds $1 billion per month. He stated that the disputed transactions that prompted JPMorgan's action were due to a large influx of customers using the services provided by stablecoin companies. 'It was entirely because they opened the floodgates, and a large number of people rushed in through the internet,' Gupta said, referring to the disputed transactions of these startups.

Venezuela Sanctions

JPMorgan stated that freezing the accounts of these stablecoin companies was not due to the nature of their business. 'This has nothing to do with stablecoin companies,' a JPMorgan spokesperson said. 'We provide banking services to stablecoin issuers and related businesses, and we recently facilitated the listing of a stablecoin issuer.' Beyond this, the bank declined to comment further.

Kontigo, which raised $20 million from several venture capital firms including Y Combinator and Founders Inc., is one of two cryptocurrency platforms authorized by Venezuelan regulators to operate in the country. Kontigo focuses on serving Venezuelan customers, and its founders claim the company has processed over $1 billion in transactions. Over the past two decades, the U.S. has imposed sanctions on certain sectors of Venezuela's economy, the government, and individuals, and President Donald Trump has been increasing pressure on Venezuela's ruling authorities.

In a promotional video released by Kontigo this month, the company claimed: 'In just 30 seconds, individuals and businesses worldwide can transact using USDC and USDT stablecoins without KYC (Know Your Customer). Users can link bank accounts and instantly transfer funds globally without limits.' Kontigo co-founder Jesus Castillo stated that customers do not need to submit identity verification for cryptocurrency transactions, but identity verification is required for transactions involving fiat currency.

According to Kontigo's communication records with customers, JPMorgan suddenly froze the company's account in November. Checkbook CEO Gupta stated that the account freeze was due to a significant increase in the number of disputed transactions. Castillo, however, said that his startup and other similar companies are facing issues caused by Checkbook.

The role Kontigo plays in transferring funds out of Venezuela was highlighted in a recent report by Transparencia Venezuela, the Venezuelan chapter of Transparency International. The report stated that users could deposit up to $100,000 into Kontigo's digital wallet through private banks in Venezuela without any identity checks on the depositor. Castillo called these claims false and stated that the company has filed a lawsuit against the nonprofit. Transparencia Venezuela did not comment.

He mentioned that Kontigo also uses Bridge, owned by Stripe, to provide virtual accounts for some of its users in the U.S. and Europe. Castillo did not respond to questions about Kontigo's compliance controls. Bridge declined to comment.

After JPMorgan froze Blindpay's account, the stablecoin company's CEO and co-founder Simon Moura and co-founder João Borges flew to San Francisco to meet with an investor from Y Combinator and search for a new payment processor or bank willing to work with them.

'Unfortunately, we were rejected by this promising payment processor because they are still reluctant to work with stablecoin companies,' Moura wrote in a now-deleted blog post. Moura also visited JPMorgan's office to explain how Blindpay operates.

Due to issues with due diligence, Blindpay's potential customer base appears to have significantly shrunk. First, the company stated in a later-deleted blog post that customers from 'high-risk countries' would need to 'undergo stricter KYC processes,' referring to the 'Know Your Customer' regulatory system applicable to banks. A few days later, Blindpay announced that, after a round of due diligence, all its virtual accounts and related crypto wallets had been closed.


Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598958

Related Questions

QWhy did JPMorgan freeze the accounts of stablecoin startups like Blindpay and Kontigo?

AJPMorgan froze the accounts due to a significant increase in disputed transactions, such as chargebacks and refunds, which raised concerns about compliance and potential risks, including fraud and unauthorized use.

QWhat role did Checkbook play in the relationship between JPMorgan and the stablecoin startups?

ACheckbook, a digital payments company, acted as an intermediary by providing virtual accounts through JPMorgan, allowing stablecoin startups to access the U.S. financial system. However, Checkbook relied on the startups to conduct their own customer due diligence.

QHow did the stablecoin startups like Kontigo and Blindpay initially attract customers, and what compliance issues arose?

AKontigo initially advertised no KYC (Know Your Customer) requirements for cryptocurrency transactions, while Blindpay faced issues with inadequate identity verification. This led to compliance risks, including potential money laundering and violations of sanctions, especially in high-risk regions like Venezuela.

QWhat impact did the U.S. sanctions on Venezuela have on Kontigo's operations?

AKontigo, which focused on serving Venezuelan customers, faced challenges due to U.S. sanctions on Venezuela. Its role in facilitating fund transfers out of Venezuela drew scrutiny, as it was accused of allowing large deposits without proper identity verification, though the company denied these claims.

QWhat broader concerns do regulators and law enforcement agencies have regarding stablecoins?

ARegulators and law enforcement agencies worry that stablecoins are being used for illicit activities, such as funding terrorist organizations, money laundering, and other criminal endeavors, due to potential loopholes in compliance and verification processes.

Related Reads

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: The Three AI Giants Racing for IPO, Which One Is Worth Betting On?

SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are poised for historic IPOs within weeks, potentially raising a combined $180 billion—a sum exceeding the entire internet bubble's fundraising. The hosts of the Limitless Podcast argue this isn't just individual company financing but an unprecedented capital concentration for AI infrastructure, driven by an insatiable need for compute, data centers, power, and chips. SpaceX's IPO is notable for reportedly changing market index rules to allow faster inclusion, potentially funneling trillions in passive retirement funds into its stock, despite its unproven space-based data center business model. In contrast, Anthropic demonstrates explosive growth, with ARR reportedly hitting $45 billion and approaching profitability, fueled by strong enterprise adoption of products like Claude Code. Google's separate $80 billion raise highlights the immense capital pressure, even for giants. The discussion acknowledges bubble risks but leans optimistic. The hosts contend the massive spending is building essential physical infrastructure for the next technological era. A key bottleneck isn't capital but the real-world limits of chip manufacturing and construction speed. As long as demand for AI compute outstrips supply, this investment cycle represents a foundational build-out rather than a purely financial bubble. All three companies are seen as foundational bets on the future, with Anthropic often cited as the most immediately compelling due to its proven revenue trajectory.

marsbit1h ago

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: The Three AI Giants Racing for IPO, Which One Is Worth Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

From "Vintage Tech" to "New AI Darlings": How AI Revalues Old Infrastructure One year ago, tech giants like Dell, Nokia, Cisco, and Western Data were seen as slow-growth, low-valuation stories, far from the AI spotlight dominated by players like Nvidia. Now, these legacy tech stocks are gaining market attention, sparking debate on whether this is genuine industry revaluation or a temporary narrative. As AI moves from model parameters to real-world data centers, the market is recognizing companies with proven delivery and infrastructure capabilities. This shift marks a change in the AI investment thesis: from pure model and GPU focus to the complex systems engineering required for deployment. Companies like Dell, HPE, and Corning are being revalued not for being "sexy" AI innovators, but for their decades of accumulated expertise in supply chains, enterprise delivery, and infrastructure—assets that have become critical in the AI buildout phase. The revaluation is unfolding across three key infrastructure lines: 1. **Servers & System Integration:** Dell and HPE are emerging as crucial system integrators or "general contractors" for AI data centers, translating GPU orders into complete, deployable server racks integrated with power, cooling, and networking. 2. **Networking & Connectivity:** AI's scale demands robust high-speed connections. Corning (fiber optics), Nokia (AI-RAN, 6G), and Cisco (data center switches) are gaining importance for enabling efficient data transfer within and between AI clusters. 3. **Storage:** Beyond high-speed memory (HBM/DRAM), the AI data explosion is driving demand for high-capacity hard drives (HDDs) from companies like Western Digital and Seagate to handle training data, logs, and cold storage cost-effectively. For this revaluation to be substantive and not just a narrative, three criteria are key: 1) Concrete AI-related order and revenue growth (e.g., Dell's AI server sales), 2) Upward revisions to company financial guidance, and 3) Sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line revenue spikes. In essence, AI's transition to a real construction phase is re-pricing "old assets" against "new demand." The opportunity, however, is selective. Only those legacy firms that are demonstrably integrated into the capital expenditure chains of data center and enterprise AI deployment are likely to experience a true "logic re-rating" rather than just a temporary valuation bounce.

marsbit1h ago

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

marsbit1h ago

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

OpenAI is shifting its strategic focus from ChatGPT to Codex, merging them along with the browser tool Atlas into a unified desktop super-app. This move signals an internal belief that Codex, originally a programming tool, represents the next evolution of AI more than conversational models like ChatGPT. Over the past year, Codex's weekly active users have surged past 5 million. The key distinction is that while ChatGPT answers questions, Codex executes tasks. Enterprises increasingly value this ability to get work done over simply receiving advice. Consequently, Codex is attracting professionals beyond developers, including analysts, bankers, marketers, and product managers. OpenAI's reorganization and increased investment in Codex stem from recognizing that the future of AI competition lies in execution capabilities, not just conversation. The company is launching role-specific plugins (e.g., for data analysis, sales, design) to transform Codex into a broad knowledge work platform that automates and redefines white-collar workflows. Beyond being a tool, Codex reflects OpenAI's ambition to redefine software. New features like "Sites"—which generates interactive websites from documents—and collaborative "Annotations" aim to create a paradigm where the AI understands the goal and handles the tools and steps, functioning more like a digital colleague than traditional software. The ultimate goal is a unified experience where the user cares only about the completed task.

marsbit1h ago

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

marsbit1h ago

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbit1h ago

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片