It's 2026 Already, DAOs Should Have Matured by Now

比推Published on 2026-01-29Last updated on 2026-01-29

Abstract

By 2026, DAO governance is maturing beyond idealistic experiments. In 2025, major protocols shifted from pure community governance to hybrid models with clearer operational control, as seen with Arbitrum’s OpCo and Uniswap’s DUNI framework. Voting participation declined but became more concentrated among professional delegates, while token value accumulation gained prominence through buybacks, fee switches, and staking mechanisms. Key conflicts, like Gnosis terminating Karpatkey and Aave’s revenue dispute with Aave Labs, highlighted accountability gaps. Looking ahead, DAOs will formalize legal structures, prioritize risk management, and leverage AI for decision-making. Governance tokens must capture economic value to sustain engagement. The evolution reflects a balance between decentralized oversight and operational efficiency, signaling DAO’s maturation into more effective, accountable organizations.

Author: Pink Brains

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Original title: It's 2026 Already, DAOs Should Have Matured by Now

Deep Tide Guide: 2025 was a critical inflection point for decentralized governance (DAO). After years of idealistic experimentation, mainstream protocols began to seriously address core pain points such as power distribution, accountability mechanisms, and sustainability. This article is written by veteran DAO delegate Pink Brains, based on their practical experience of casting 725 votes in top protocols like Aave, Lido, and Gnosis. It provides an in-depth analysis of the shift in DAOs from "community autonomy" to a "hybrid operation" model.

The author points out that governance tokens alone are no longer sustainable. In the future, DAOs will evolve towards economic alignment, legal entity formation, and AI-assisted decision-making. This is not just a review of governance; it's a prophecy book for the evolution of Web3 organizational structures in 2026.

Full text below:

2025 marked a turning point for decentralized governance.

After years of experimentation, major protocols began confronting fundamental questions about power distribution, accountability, and sustainability.

The answers weren't always pleasant, but they were necessary.

What We Achieved in 2025

2025 was also the first year of our operation as an active DAO Delegate.

Casted 725 votes across 18 protocols
Held over 8 million in voting power
Top 10 delegate in Aave and Lido
Top 3 delegate in Velodrome
Top 6 delegate in Gnosis

This perspective, grounded in actual governance work, gave us clear insight into the patterns reshaping DAOs in 2025 and defined their trajectory entering 2026.

Changes in DAOs in 2025

Shift in Operational Model: From Pure Community Governance to Hybrid Control

The most notable change in 2025 was the shift from purely community-based governance towards hybrid models with clearer operational control.

@arbitrum introduced an Operating Company (OpCo), channeling all DAO operations through a unified structure.
@JupiterExchange completely paused governance for nearly six months to reassess its approach.
@Uniswap launched the DUNI framework, centralizing operational authority.
@Gnosis's DAO executed a hard fork amidst reduced community engagement. Scroll transitioned to a CEO-led structure.
@Scroll_ZKP suspended its DAO, shifting focus to centralized governance.
Recently, the Celo Foundation merged with @cLabs into a unified core contributor organization.

The motivation for this shift was DAOs hitting scaling limits. Execution became the bottleneck. Full-community votes were often too slow for operations, too noisy for technical nuances, and too vulnerable for security-sensitive actions.

Consequently, governance power concentrated towards smaller, high-context groups, while the broader community shifted towards oversight functions, as seen in the next section.

Fewer Voters, But More Concentrated Power

In 2025, the number of proposals and participating voters dropped significantly across major DAOs. However, the voting power behind each proposal remained strong.

Lido saw an increase in participation after adopting a dual governance framework.
Arbitrum and Uniswap still had the highest overall participation, but both saw a decrease in the number of voters.

Caption: From DeFiLlama's State of DeFi 2025 Report

This does not signal the failure of governance. Instead, governance became more bundled, more operationally abstract, and less frequent.

Governance influence migrated to a small number of highly active Delegates and heavily capitalized participants.

Value Accrual for Token Holders

"Token buyback," "buyback and burn," and "fee switch" became central themes in 2025.

For years, token utility revolved around voting rights and incentive distribution, but offered minimal economic value to token holders. 2025 changed this equation.

Lido adopted a buyback framework.
Uniswap DAO activated the long-awaited fee switch, pledging to burn nearly $600 million worth of UNI tokens.
Aave implemented a token buyback mechanism. Optimism launched a buyback program.
CoW Protocol increased solver profitability in a way that benefits token holders.

This trend addresses a key challenge in tokenomics. Buybacks and burns reduce circulating supply, making the token more scarce. If demand holds steady, the price strengthens. When token holders can actually benefit from the protocol's success, they are more incentivized to buy, hold, and participate in governance decisions long-term.

Who Really Owns the DAO?

Two major controversies forced DAOs to confront structural flaws.

Gnosis voted to terminate Karpatkey's treasury mandate due to fee disputes, underperformance, and a ~$700k loss related to a liquidity issue.
Tensions between Aave DAO and Aave Labs escalated when it was discovered that ~$10 million annually in swap fees from the CoW Swap integration were flowing to Aave Labs instead of the DAO. A vote on brand ownership failed, and the controversy left a harder question: what does "DAO-owned" really mean when the core team controls development and distribution?

These conflicts forced protocols to fill the gaps in accountability and governance structures.

Legal Infrastructure is Adapting to DAOs

Despite DeFi's growth, most DAOs still lack clear legal structures, creating liability and regulatory risks as protocols scale.

While jurisdictions like Wyoming have introduced DAO LLC frameworks, and Switzerland offers mature legal pathways, most DAOs remain in a legal gray area.

2026 Trend Predictions

Centralized DAOs as a New Practice

Protocols will develop clear frameworks to delineate "community decisions" from "operational decisions," moving beyond the false binary of "fully decentralized" or "fully centralized."

Operational Execution: Will be handled by Labs teams, not foundations.
Community Oversight: DAO delegates and the community will be responsible for treasury strategy, long-term direction, and major structural decisions.

Governance Shifts Towards Risk Management Infrastructure

The DAO of the future will be less like a forum full of chatter. More teams will bifurcate decisions into concave decisions and convex decisions.

Concave problems require:

Pre-approved guardrails and automated execution.
Professional oversight (risk services, auditors, security teams).
Rapid response frameworks for emergencies and market shocks.
Fewer proposals, but each decision carries higher economic impact.

Convex problems (like product direction) require decisive leadership, where the DAO acts as a "brake" or "checkpoint," not a "steering wheel."

By 2026, this will be standard for lending, stablecoins, perps, and any protocol where financial risk can compound quickly.

The End of Governance Tokens? Value Capture is a Must

Continuing into 2026, tokens with only governance functions will struggle to maintain long-term engagement.

Delegates, whales, and strategic holders won't consistently provide protection for the system without seeing a return profile. Protocols will increasingly adopt at least one value accrual path:

Token buyback frameworks.
Fee diversion or revenue sharing.
Staking tied to protocol cash flows.
Treasury strategies aimed at supporting token value.

When holders gain economically from the protocol's success, they are incentivized to stay attentive, participate, and protect the system.

Legal Structures Shift from Optional to Necessary

Regulatory pressure and real-world legal challenges will push DAOs towards formal entity formation, seeking a balance between decentralized governance and legal clarity.

Professional Delegation

As governance complexity increases, token holders will increasingly delegate to full-time professional delegates. While this concentrates voting power, it may improve decision quality. Meanwhile, weaker delegate institutions that cannot financially sustain themselves will fold, as governance work becomes more professional, political, and costly.

Privacy, AI & Futarchy

Public governance is a social game. When every vote is publicly visible, decisions are influenced by reputation, pressure, and alliances, rather than purely the protocol's best interest. Therefore, governance privacy will become more important in the future.

AI will address decision fatigue. It can assist in analyzing proposals and auto-voting on routine upgrades based on user-defined preferences, requiring human intervention only for disputes or high-impact matters.

Futarchy markets will also play a larger role in DAOs. They let market signals predict which option might create value. Gnosis is testing this model, using retail prediction markets to reflect sentiment on proposals.

Crypto is Maturing, and So Are DAOs

The shifts we see in DAO operations, economic alignment, accountability conflicts, and professionalization represent maturation, not the end of DAOs.

DAOs are evolving from ideological experiment to organizational architecture that balances "decentralized oversight" with "proven operational efficiency." We believe DAO governance becomes meaningful if teams can align with community interests: moving fast when action is needed, letting growth benefit token holders, and holding all participants—core teams and delegates alike—accountable.

As Vitalik said: We need more DAOs, but different and better DAOs.

If you believe in the value of DAOs, we can be your voice.

Effective delegation is more than just casting a vote; it means doing the actual work: reading proposals, being active on forums, understanding risks, and voting against bad decisions, even when it's not the popular choice.

This is how we operate as delegates: through clear communication and educational content, helping the protocol grow while staying aligned with community incentives.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7607064

Bitcoin ETFs Rout Extends To June With $1.72 Billion Net Outflows In First Week

U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs extended their downturn into early June, recording net outflows of approximately $1.72 billion from June 1-5 following a poor May. This trend reflects sustained bearish sentiment, with only one day of positive net inflows in the past 15 trading sessions. BlackRock's IBIT led the withdrawals with $1.34 billion in outflows, while most other major funds also saw redemptions. Total ETF net assets fell over 20% to $75.12 billion. In parallel, Ethereum spot ETFs saw net outflows of $168 million, indicating investor caution amid macroeconomic uncertainty. Bitcoin's price hovered around $61,592 at press time.

bitcoinist2h ago

Bitcoin ETFs Rout Extends To June With $1.72 Billion Net Outflows In First Week

bitcoinist2h ago

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, suffered a historic collapse in price, losing over 50% of its value in 24 hours and erasing billions from its market cap. The dramatic sell-off was triggered by the disclosure of a major vulnerability in the Zcash Orchard privacy pool that had remained undetected since May 2022. A security researcher, using AI, developed a proof-of-concept to generate counterfeit ZEC. While the bug was patched by June 2, Zcash's privacy design makes it impossible to verify if any fake coins were minted before the fix, fueling market panic and uncertainty. This event highlights the trade-off between privacy and transparency. In response, Shielded Labs is exploring a network upgrade to allow supply verification. Despite the crisis, proponents argue that the discovery by world-class security researchers demonstrates the network's commitment to proactive hardening and resilience.

bitcoinist6h ago

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

bitcoinist6h ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit7h ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit7h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手7h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手7h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit8h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit8h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures