India Tightens Crypto Oversight: 49 Exchanges Registered, Unregistered Ones Grow

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-01-07Last updated on 2026-01-07

Abstract

The Indian government is tightening cryptocurrency oversight, with 49 exchanges registering with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) in FY 2024-25. These platforms must now comply with anti-money laundering regulations, including filing suspicious transaction reports and disclosing beneficiary details. Authorities imposed fines of approximately $3.1 million on non-compliant platforms and blocked around 25 offshore exchanges for failing to register. The measures aim to combat illicit activities such as money laundering, terror financing, and fraud. Users should expect stricter KYC checks and potential disruptions if using unregistered platforms.

The Indian government continues to take stricter steps to regulate cryptocurrency transactions, with many platforms coming under tougher regulation to combat money laundering and other illicit practices using cryptocurrencies.

As reported by official sources, nearly 50 cryptocurrency exchanges registered themselves with India’s Financial Intelligence Unit in the 2024-25 fiscal year, out of which 45 are in India and four are abroad.

Exchanges Register With FIU

The registrations make the exchanges reporting entities under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. They are now required to file Suspicious Transaction Reports, identify wallet beneficiaries, and disclose bank accounts and platform contact details to the FIU. These steps aim to make it easier for authorities to trace large or unusual flows of funds.

Regulatory Action And Penalties

Last year saw concrete enforcement. Regulators imposed fines totaling about ₹28 crore on non-compliant platforms during FY 2024–25, a figure that media reports have translated to roughly $3.1 million. At the same time, the FIU issued notices and ordered blocks against a group of offshore platforms that had failed to register or meet anti-money-laundering obligations.

Authorities say the move followed strategic analysis of Suspicious Transaction Reports that flagged patterns of misuse. Reported red flags included hawala-style transfers, gambling and fraud schemes, instances tied to darknet services, and links to terror financing and child sexual abuse material. Those findings helped shape the decision to escalate oversight and enforcement.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.18 trillion. Chart: TradingView

Offshore Platforms Targeted

The FIU sent notices to and ordered the takedown of access for a list of about 25 offshore exchanges that were serving Indian users without registering. Several mainstream news outlets and legal newsletters named platforms such as BitMEX, LBank, Paxful, CEX.IO and others among those targeted. These actions used powers under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act and the Information Technology Act to block apps and web access in India.

For traders and savers, the drift is clear: expect stricter KYC checks and closer monitoring of transfers between wallets and bank accounts. Registered exchanges will likely have more compliance steps and reporting duties. That can mean extra paperwork and, in some cases, higher costs as platforms absorb compliance expenses. At the same time, users who rely on unregistered overseas platforms risk losing access if those services are blocked domestically.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Related Questions

QHow many cryptocurrency exchanges registered with India's Financial Intelligence Unit in the 2024-25 fiscal year, and how many of these are based in India?

A49 cryptocurrency exchanges registered with India's Financial Intelligence Unit in the 2024-25 fiscal year, out of which 45 are based in India and 4 are based abroad.

QWhat are the key compliance requirements for FIU-registered crypto exchanges in India under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act?

AFIU-registered crypto exchanges are required to file Suspicious Transaction Reports, identify wallet beneficiaries, and disclose bank accounts and platform contact details to the FIU.

QWhat was the total amount of fines imposed on non-compliant crypto platforms in India during FY 2024-25, and what is its approximate value in US dollars?

ARegulators imposed fines totaling about ₹28 crore on non-compliant platforms during FY 2024-25, which is roughly equivalent to $3.1 million.

QWhat types of illicit activities were flagged in the Suspicious Transaction Reports that led to increased oversight?

AThe Suspicious Transaction Reports flagged patterns of misuse including hawala-style transfers, gambling and fraud schemes, instances tied to darknet services, and links to terror financing and child sexual abuse material.

QWhat action did the FIU take against offshore cryptocurrency exchanges that were serving Indian users without registering?

AThe FIU sent notices to and ordered the takedown of access for about 25 offshore exchanges that were serving Indian users without registering, using powers under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act and the Information Technology Act to block their apps and web access in India.

Related Reads

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit1h ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit1h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit2h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片