IMF Flags Financial Stability Risks Amid Growing Tokenization Boom

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-04-03Last updated on 2026-04-03

Abstract

The IMF acknowledges that tokenization can increase transparency and reduce friction in finance but also warns it poses significant risks to financial stability. While atomic settlement and automation may reduce some traditional risks, they introduce new ones, making the overall impact uncertain. The tokenized asset market, currently valued at over $27.6 billion (excluding stablecoins), is projected to reach between $2 trillion and $16 trillion by 2030. The IMF report highlights both positive effects, such as faster cross-border payments and greater financial inclusion, and negative consequences, including increased capital flow volatility and threats to monetary sovereignty. It cautions that risks are shifting from banks to shared ledgers and smart contracts. Major institutions like BlackRock and the Intercontinental Exchange are advancing in tokenization, but the IMF warns that without legal clarity on ownership and settlement, these markets risk becoming fragmented and insignificant.

While the IMF acknowledged that tokenization might increase transparency and decrease friction in the financial sector, it also cautioned that the technology could pose risks to the sector’s stability.

With atomic settlement and improved transparency reducing certain old risks and speed and automation introducing new ones, the total impact of tokenization on financial stability is unknown, according to the IMF’s 23-page assessment released on Thursday.

Based on statistics from RWA.xyz, the total value of tokenized assets onchain exceeds $27.6 billion (not including stablecoins). The tokenization market might reach $16 trillion by 2030, according to Boston Consulting Group’s 2022 projection, but a more cautious $2 trillion, according to McKinsey & Co’s 2024 prediction.

Both Positive and Negative Effects

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has said that although tokenization does increase the issuance, trading, settlement, and management of securities and other financial instruments, it also moves risks away from the banking sector and onto shared ledgers and smart contract code.

Tokenization, according to the agency, has both positive and negative aspects. On one hand, it may facilitate speedier cross-border payments and increase financial inclusion in developing nations. On the other hand, it increases the danger of capital flow volatility, currency substitution, and the loss of monetary sovereignty.

Some prominent Wall Street figures, including Larry Fink, CEO of BlackRock, have advocated for the tokenization of various assets on the blockchain, including equities, bonds, money market funds, and even real estate.

The BlackRock USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund’s tokenization platform, Securitize, ranks first among RWA tokenization platforms by total value locked at $3.38 billion, according to CryptoDep’s citation of April 1 data.

Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, has also taken action, saying in January that it would provide a tokenization platform that allows for the post-trade settlement of exchange-traded funds and equities and the 24/7 trading of these assets using a blockchain technology.

Tokenized markets run the danger of becoming disjointed and unimportant if there is no legal certainty about ownership records and settlement finality, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Hong Kong Stablecoin Licensing Delayed as HKMA Holds Back Approvals

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

Tencent's Hunyuan AI team has released its latest language model, Hy3 preview, marking a significant step forward for the company's AI capabilities. With 295B total parameters and support for 256K context length, the model employs a mixture-of-experts architecture. It shows improvements in complex logic, instruction following, contextual learning, code generation, and agent task execution. In testing, Hy3 preview demonstrated strong performance in multi-step logical reasoning but showed occasional instability in identifying traps in trick questions. It performed well in extracting key information from disordered meeting transcripts and accurately followed new linguistic rules. As an AI agent, it successfully built functional applications like a Snake game and generated data analysis dashboards, though it sometimes fell short in fully completing complex open-ended tasks. In natural language use, it produced coherent and stylistically appropriate narratives with reduced “AI-like” tone. Priced competitively, Hy3 preview is already integrated into Tencent’s key products, including Tencent Cloud and WorkBuddy. While not leading in every benchmark, it represents a solid, practical model that signals Tencent’s renewed momentum in AI development.

marsbit23m ago

Hands-on with Hunyuan Hy3 Preview: Tencent's AI, Finally Competitive?

marsbit23m ago

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

A sophisticated crypto laundering operation was executed following the $292 million hack of Kelp DAO on April 18. The attack, attributed to the North Korean Lazarus group, began with anonymous infrastructure preparation using Tornado Cash to fund wallets untraceably. The hacker exploited a vulnerability in Kelp’s cross-chain bridge, stealing 116,500 rsETH. To avoid crashing the market, the attacker used Aave and Compound as laundering tools—depositing the stolen rsETH as collateral to borrow $190 million in clean, liquid ETH. This move triggered a bank run on Aave, causing an $8 billion drop in TVL. After consolidating funds, the attacker fragmented them across hundreds of wallets to evade detection. A major breakpoint was THORChain, where over $460 million in volume—30 times its usual activity—was processed in 24 hours, converting ETH into Bitcoin. This shift to Bitcoin’s UTXO model exponentially increased tracing complexity by shattering funds into countless untraceable fragments. The final destination was Tron-based USDT, the primary channel for illicit crypto flows. From there, funds were cashed out via OTC brokers in China and Southeast Asia, using unlicensed underground banks and UnionPay networks outside Western sanctions scope. Ultimately, the laundered money supports North Korea’s weapons programs, which rely heavily on crypto hacking for foreign currency. The incident underscores structural challenges in DeFi: its openness, composability, and lack of central control make such laundering not just possible, but inherently difficult to prevent.

marsbit28m ago

From Theft to Re-entry: How Was $292 Million "Laundered"?

marsbit28m ago

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

China's AI landscape is witnessing a strategic divergence from Silicon Valley’s closed-source competition to a collaborative open-source ecosystem. On April 24, DeepSeek released V4, a top-ranked open-source model on Hugging Face, featuring breakthroughs like million-token context length with minimal KV cache and native support for domestic chips like Huawei’s Ascend. Similarly, Kimi’s K2.6, released days earlier, also adopted open-source principles. Unlike U.S. giants such as OpenAI and Anthropic—locked in revenue disputes and tactical product clashes—Chinese firms embrace shared innovation. DeepSeek and Kimi openly build on each other’s advances, like the MLA architecture and Muon optimizer, avoiding redundant R&D and driving down costs. DeepSeek V4 focused on pushing base model capabilities, while Kimi specialized in Agent-based applications. Although U.S. firms lead in revenue and valuation, China’s open-source models achieve comparable performance at a fraction of the cost (e.g., DeepSeek V3 trained for $5.58M vs. GPT-5’s $500M+). With token usage growing exponentially, China’s collaborative model promises scalable, affordable AI built on domestic hardware, shaping a more accessible path to AGI.

marsbit38m ago

Behind DeepSeek V4's Stunning Debut: Silicon Valley Is 'Building Walls,' China Is 'Paving Roads'

marsbit38m ago

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

Two leading AI agent projects, OpenClaw and Hermes, represent a fundamental divergence in design philosophy rather than just a feature competition. OpenClaw, a GitHub phenomenon, prioritizes user control and customization, offering a powerful, flexible platform for building and orchestrating agents. It boasts a massive ecosystem with over 44,000 skills, extensive model flexibility (supporting Anthropic, OpenAI, and others), and deep integrations across multiple messaging platforms. In contrast, Hermes Agent, developed by Nous Research, champions automation and efficiency. It is designed for lower cost and a lower barrier to entry, learning and improving automatically from user workflows. It runs tasks in isolated environments for security and offers significantly lower token costs out-of-the-box. The choice between them mirrors historical tech divides like Windows vs. Mac. OpenClaw is for users who want maximum control, customization, and don't mind a complex setup. Hermes is the smarter default for those seeking an affordable, easy-to-use agent that learns autonomously. The real competition is not about which is better, but which philosophy—a programmable personal OS or a self-evolving work proxy—better suits the user's needs for control, cost, and ease of use.

marsbit59m ago

OpenClaw vs. Hermes: Which One Is Right for You?

marsbit59m ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit6h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit6h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures