Hyperliquid Outperformed Bitcoin By 71% In The Worst Crypto Quarter Since 2018 — Report Reveals Why

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-08Last updated on 2026-05-08

Abstract

In Q1 2026, the worst crypto quarter since 2018, decentralized exchange Hyperliquid outperformed Bitcoin by 71.5 percentage points, generating $215M in gross revenue. While overall market metrics declined, a key structural shift occurred: volume from its HIP-3 feature for real-world asset (RWA) perpetual derivatives surged 175% within the quarter, reaching $68.5B in March. A pivotal moment came on February 28 when, following geopolitical strikes, Hyperliquid's 24/7 oil perpetuals became the de facto global price discovery venue while traditional commodity exchanges were closed. The quarter also saw the landmark licensing of the S&P 500 for perpetual contracts on the platform. Despite excluding U.S. users, Hyperliquid's HYPE token returned +44.8%, supported by substantial buybacks, while the core team voluntarily left approximately $849M in unclaimed tokens. The report concludes Hyperliquid is transitioning from a DeFi narrative to a broader financial infrastructure story.

Decentralized exchange Hyperliquid delivered $215 million in gross revenue during Q1 2026 — crypto’s worst quarter since the 2018 ICO crash — outperformed Bitcoin by 71.5 percentage points, and on one February night, became the de facto global price discovery venue for crude oil while every legacy commodity exchange was closed.

The findings come from a comprehensive 48-page quarterly report published by the Hyperliquid Research Collective (HRC), a joint initiative of Four Pillars and GLC Research, drawing on on-chain data from ASXN, DeFiLlama, and 0xArchive.

The quarter unfolded as Bitcoin fell 26.7% and total crypto market capitalization shed roughly $900 billion. Hyperliquid’s headline metrics declined with the market — holder revenue dropped 33.6% quarter-over-quarter to $149.90 million and perpetual derivatives volume fell 15.6%. Those numbers, the report argues, are not the story.

HYPE's price trends to the upside on the daily chart. Source: HYPEUSD on Tradingview

The Night Hyperliquid Became The Oil Market

On February 28, following US-Israeli strikes on Iran, traditional commodity exchanges went dark. Hyperliquid’s 24/7 oil perpetual derivatives markets stayed open. The protocol became what the report describes as the de facto price discovery venue for crude oil while legacy infrastructure sat offline — an event that drew coverage from Bloomberg, the Wall Street Journal, and Fortune within a five-day window, according to the report.

That single session, the HRC notes, said more about Hyperliquid’s institutional trajectory than any quarterly metric.

The Number That Matters: HIP-3

Beneath the headline revenue decline, a structural transformation was underway. Native crypto perpetual derivatives volume fell 32.5% as risk appetite contracted. HIP-3 deployer volume — a protocol feature enabling third parties to deploy real-world asset (RWA) perpetual derivatives on Hyperliquid’s infrastructure — moved in the opposite direction entirely, growing from $24.9 billion in January to $68.5 billion in March, a 175% intra-quarter expansion, per ASXN data cited in the report.

By March, HIP-3 represented 33.6% of total daily perpetual derivatives volume and 28.7% of total platform open interest. Daily unique HIP-3 traders tripled within the quarter, reaching 40,768 on the final day. Silver was the single most traded asset at $40.7 billion in Q1 volume, exceeding crude oil by approximately 2.4x.

The quarter’s institutional landmark arrived on March 18, when S&P Dow Jones Indices officially licensed its S&P 500 benchmark to Trade[XYZ] for perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid — the first officially sanctioned equity index perpetual derivatives product on a decentralized exchange. The contract reached $2 billion in volume within its first two weeks, according to the report.

The Supply Side Signal

On the token side, Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund purchased approximately 4.94 million HYPE at an average price of $29.90 during Q1 — 18.8% below the quarter-end price of $36.85 — deploying $147.72 million into buybacks. HYPE itself returned +44.8% for the quarter, per CoinGecko data cited in the report.

The report flags an additional signal that it describes as a character disclosure rather than a financial metric. The protocol’s core team claimed just 1.51 million HYPE against a scheduled entitlement of approximately 29.8 million — a 5.1% claim rate, declining each month throughout the quarter. At average Q1 prices, the team voluntarily left approximately $849 million unclaimed.

Four separate ETF filings for HYPE — from Grayscale, VanEck, 21Shares, and Bitwise — were submitted during the quarter, per the report.

The Worst Crypto Quarter Since 2018

The report does not sidestep the primary constraint: US persons cannot access Hyperliquid’s frontend. Every revenue figure, every volume number, and every user count in the report reflects a protocol generating these results without US market participation. The HRC frames every forward valuation of HYPE as, in part, a thesis on whether that regulatory wall eventually comes down.

The Q1 2026 report marks a critical juncture for Hyperliquid’s positioning within the nascent sector. A decentralized exchange that processed live commodity trades while legacy markets were closed, licensed the S&P 500 for on-chain derivatives, and outperformed Bitcoin by 71 percentage points in the worst crypto quarter in eight years is no longer a DeFi story. It is increasingly a financial infrastructure story — and the institutions are beginning to take notice.

On the above, David Schamis, CEO at Hyperliquid Strategies stated the following:

For a year I’ve been saying Hyperliquid is emerging as the most exciting trading venue, period. Q1 settled the argument. One of the worst crypto quarters since 2018 and the protocol still generated more than $200M in revenue, bought back >5M HYPE, brought the S&P 500 onto a decentralized exchange and became the price of oil when legacy markets were closed for the Iran conflict. This isn’ t a future story anymore — it’s all happening now.

Cover image from Grok, BTCUSD chart on Tradingview

Related Questions

QAccording to the Hyperliquid Research Collective report, by what percentage did Hyperliquid's native token HYPE outperform Bitcoin in Q1 2026?

AHyperliquid's native token HYPE outperformed Bitcoin by 71.5 percentage points in Q1 2026. HYPE returned +44.8% for the quarter while Bitcoin fell 26.7%.

QWhat specific event on February 28, 2026, demonstrated Hyperliquid's institutional relevance, as described in the report?

AOn February 28, 2026, following US-Israeli strikes on Iran, traditional commodity exchanges closed. Hyperliquid's 24/7 oil perpetual derivatives markets remained open, becoming the de facto global price discovery venue for crude oil while legacy infrastructure was offline.

QWhat was the key driver (HIP-3 volume) behind Hyperliquid's structural transformation in Q1 2026, and how much did it grow?

AThe key driver was HIP-3 deployer volume, which enables third parties to deploy real-world asset (RWA) perpetual derivatives. It grew from $24.9 billion in January to $68.5 billion in March, a 175% intra-quarter expansion.

QWhat major institutional milestone for decentralized exchanges did Hyperliquid achieve on March 18, 2026?

AOn March 18, 2026, S&P Dow Jones Indices officially licensed its S&P 500 benchmark to Trade[XYZ] for perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid. This was the first officially sanctioned equity index perpetual derivatives product on a decentralized exchange.

QWhat significant constraint does the report highlight regarding Hyperliquid's current operations and revenue generation?

AThe report highlights that US persons cannot access Hyperliquid's frontend. All revenue, volume, and user counts were generated without US market participation, framing forward valuations as partly a thesis on whether this regulatory barrier eventually comes down.

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手5h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit7h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit7h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

366 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片