FTX Co-Founder Bankman-Fried Requests Trump Pardon–FTT Soars 45%

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-08Last updated on 2026-06-08

Abstract

Sam Bankman-Fried, the convicted former CEO of bankrupt crypto exchange FTX, has formally requested a presidential pardon from Donald Trump. He confirmed the move in an interview, stating he "absolutely" wants clemency. In March 2024, Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years for fraud and conspiracy linked to FTX's collapse, which caused billions in losses for customers and investors. Despite his conviction, he maintains the case was unfair, claiming FTX customers have now been repaid with interest. Following news of his pardon bid, FTX's native token, FTT, surged 45% in price, though it remains 99.5% below its all-time high.

Sam Bankman-Fried, the co-founder and former CEO of the collapsed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, moved forward with a new legal effort on Monday by filing a request for a presidential pardon from President Trump.

Bankman-Fried’s Pardon Bid

Bloomberg reported that Bankman-Fried submitted an application to the Office of the Pardon Attorney within the US Department of Justice (DOJ), seeking what the site describes as a “pardon after completion of sentence.”

Later on Monday, during an exclusive conversation with FOX Business correspondent Susan Li, Bankman-Fried said he “absolutely” wants a presidential pardon. When Li asked whether he would expect to seek one from the White House, he agreed.

“Absolutely,” he said, adding that the decision ultimately rests with the president rather than him. Asked if his family or people he has been in contact with are lobbying the administration on his behalf, the FTX co-founder declined to confirm, stating, “I can’t speak for them.”

In March 2024, Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison after a jury found him guilty on two counts of wire fraud and five counts of conspiracy tied to the fall of his crypto empire.

The court also concluded that FTX customers lost $8 billion, equity investors associated with FTX lost $1.7 billion, and lenders to the Alameda Research hedge fund—Bankman-Fried’s firm—lost $1.3 billion.

FTX Token Rallies 45%

Despite the conviction and long sentence, Bankman-Fried has continued to argue that the case against him was unfair. He told Li that he believes FTX customers have ultimately been repaid and pointed to improvements in bankruptcy outcomes that he said have been helped, at least in part, by a recovery in cryptocurrency markets.

“I didn’t steal user funds either,” he said, adding that customers have been repaid, “now 170% or so on their deposits.” He described the situation as one of the few cases where the platform was reportedly over-collateralized—meaning customers were more than fully made whole—yet he said prosecutors still pursued criminal charges.

Notably, the move sparked a major surge in the price of FTX’s native token, FTT. On Monday, it recorded a massive 45% rally, reaching around $0.33 by the time this piece was written. However, the token’s recovery still leaves it 99.5% below its all-time high of $84, which was reached at the peak of the exchange’s operations.

The 1-D chart shows FTT’s price rally on Monday. Source: FTTUSDT on TradingView.com

Featured image created with OpenArt; chart from TradingView.com

Related Questions

QWhat legal action did Sam Bankman-Fried take on Monday, and from whom did he request it?

ASam Bankman-Fried filed a request for a presidential pardon from President Trump with the Office of the Pardon Attorney within the US Department of Justice.

QWhat was the reason for Sam Bankman-Fried's 25-year prison sentence in March 2024?

AHe was sentenced to 25 years in prison after being found guilty on two counts of wire fraud and five counts of conspiracy related to the collapse of FTX.

QAccording to the court, what were the financial losses for FTX customers, equity investors, and Alameda Research lenders?

AFTX customers lost $8 billion, equity investors lost $1.7 billion, and lenders to Alameda Research lost $1.3 billion.

QHow did Sam Bankman-Fried defend himself regarding the use of customer funds, and what repayment claim did he make?

AHe stated, 'I didn’t steal user funds either,' and claimed that customers have been repaid 'now 170% or so on their deposits.'

QHow did the news of Bankman-Fried's pardon request affect the price of FTX's native token, FTT?

AThe price of FTT surged by 45% on Monday, reaching around $0.33, though it remains 99.5% below its all-time high of $84.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit16m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit16m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片