Expert Urges Senate to Pass CLARITY Act for National Security Interests

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-10Last updated on 2026-08-10

Abstract

Former U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper is urging the Senate to urgently pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), framing it as a critical national security issue. Esper, who served under President Trump, argues the bill extends crucial U.S. dollar transaction controls into the digital asset ecosystem. He warns that failure to pass it risks losing transparency in international financial flows, undermining U.S. sanctions effectiveness, and ceding ground to China, which is advancing state-controlled digital payment systems. Esper emphasizes that stablecoins, often backed by U.S. Treasuries and processing billions, are central to this new financial landscape. The CLARITY Act would apply Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act to digital assets, helping prevent sanctioned regimes like North Korea and criminal syndicates from exploiting offshore loopholes. Furthermore, he contends the legislation would foster U.S.-led innovation in cryptocurrencies, allowing American companies to set the rules for the next financial era, much like the private sector built the internet. With time running out, Esper calls on the Senate to lead and pass the bill for the President's signature.

While the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, widely known as the CLARITY Act, awaits a potential Senate vote in September, former Department of Defense officials have emphasized the relevance of this initiative to defense.

Mark Esper, who served as U.S. Secretary of Defense in Donald Trump's first administration, emphasized that the implications of the CLARITY Act extend far beyond the financial services realm and touch upon the U.S. defense complex tied to the dollar.

Esper stressed that the CLARITY Act would establish appropriate provisions extending the controls currently applied to dollar-denominated transactions to the digital asset ecosystem, and that failing to pass it risks losing transparency into international financial flows and the related ability to apply sanctions.

"That's why the CLARITY Act, now pending in the Senate, is not just a financial services bill. It is also a national security bill, and it should be treated as such and passed urgently," he noted in a recently published article.

Stablecoins play a unique role in this new system, as settlements worth billions are already being conducted through them, rivaling the world's largest credit companies, with the majority of their value backed by U.S. Treasury bonds.

In Esper's view, inaction in preserving American dominance in this sphere would allow China, which is already investing in state-controlled digital asset-based payment systems, to set its own rules and ultimately undermine the dollar's role as the de facto standard for savings and settlements.

The CLARITY Act extends the application of Section 311 of the U.S. Patriot Act to the digital asset ecosystem, providing several benefits in combating illicit actors. "This will work to stop North Korea, criminal syndicates, and sanctioned regimes from using offshore loopholes to bypass America's financial perimeter," he said.

No less important, Esper emphasizes that the CLARITY Act will allow cryptocurrency innovation to remain on U.S. soil, enabling American companies to develop protocols for deploying digital assets and achieve dominance in the same way the internet was built: by a U.S.-focused private sector.

"We have a narrow window to set the terms of the next financial age ourselves, not inherit them from our rivals... The Senate must take the lead. It must pass the CLARITY Act and send it to the President for signature," he concluded, despite the diminishing time to pass the CLARITY Act.

end-content

Related Questions

QWho is Mark Esper and what is his position regarding the CLARITY Act?

AMark Esper is the former U.S. Secretary of Defense under President Donald Trump. He strongly advocates for the CLARITY Act, arguing it is a national security bill that should be passed urgently.

QWhat is the primary defense-related concern that the CLARITY Act aims to address, according to the article?

AThe primary defense concern is maintaining the transparency of international financial flows and the efficacy of U.S. sanctions. The Act aims to prevent U.S. adversaries like North Korea, criminal syndicates, and sanctioned regimes from using offshore loopholes in the digital asset ecosystem to bypass the U.S. financial perimeter.

QHow does the article connect the CLARITY Act to competition with China?

AThe article states that inaction could allow China, which is investing in state-managed digital asset payment systems, to set its own rules and ultimately undermine the U.S. dollar's role as the de facto global standard for savings and transactions.

QWhat specific U.S. law does the CLARITY Act seek to extend to the digital asset ecosystem?

AThe CLARITY Act seeks to extend Section 311 of the U.S. Patriot Act to the digital asset ecosystem.

QBesides national security, what other benefit does Mark Esper attribute to the CLARITY Act?

AHe argues that the Act will preserve cryptocurrency innovation within the United States, allowing American companies to develop protocols and achieve dominance in the digital asset space, similar to how the private sector built the internet.

Related Reads

Fed Research: Crypto Investors Driven by Beliefs, Returns Change Their Decisions

A new working paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland provides a novel explanation for cryptocurrency's divergence from traditional financial assets. It finds that American crypto investors are distinguished not by demographics or risk tolerance alone, but by their radically different beliefs about future returns. This divergence in expectations better explains who owns crypto than factors like age or income, a reversal of the pattern seen with stocks or bonds. The research, based on surveys of up to 25,000 US households, shows crypto owners expected an average 22% annual return, compared to just 7% for non-owners. A one-percentage-point increase in an individual's expected return was linked to a 0.8-point rise in ownership likelihood. A randomized experiment revealed that simply showing information about Bitcoin's past 12-month performance increased respondents' desired crypto portfolio share by about 47% and spurred subsequent purchases, primarily among those who previously felt uninformed. The study suggests this dynamic—where past gains attract new buyers, pushing prices higher and reinforcing bullish beliefs—could fuel speculative bubbles. It also indicates crypto wealth gains are treated more like "gambling winnings" than permanent income, boosting purchases of durable goods but not everyday spending. The broader conclusion is that crypto volatility stems partly from investor disagreement and learning, not just market fundamentals. With widespread misunderstanding and shifting expectations driven by performance data, price swings are likely to remain a defining feature of the asset class. Future retail demand may depend not just on Bitcoin's price, but on what information investors receive about its past performance.

cryptonews.ru4h ago

Fed Research: Crypto Investors Driven by Beliefs, Returns Change Their Decisions

cryptonews.ru4h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片