Ethereum: Will $43M ETH whale move test THIS danger zone?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-16Last updated on 2026-01-16

Whales are known to sell at market tops and bottoms, but it’s how markets react that truly shapes price action.

On the 16th of January, Ethereum [ETH] faced selling pressure from large whales, with the price testing key resistance levels around $3,450.

Whale activity created turbulence, and the market awaited whether ETH could break through resistance or retreat toward support.

OG whale dumps 13,083 ETH

On‐chain tracker Lookonchain reported that Ethereum OG 0xB3E8 deposited 13,083 ETH (worth $43.35 million) into Gemini over the past two days, signaling a potential market shift.

Despite the large withdrawal, he still holds 34,616 ETH ($115M), showing confidence in Ethereum’s long-term prospects.

This move was seen by some as a classic profit-taking strategy, suggesting no intention of abandoning Ethereum for the long run.

Analyzing an 18,261 ETH short position

Another whale took a highly leveraged short position, betting against Ethereum. This whale deposited 3 million USDC into Hyperliquid and shorted 18,261 ETH ($60.32M).

If ETH had climbed to $3,380, the position could have been completely wiped out. This high‐risk move added significant pressure around the $3,400 level.

Liquidity clusters build around $3.4K

Ethereum’s price action was also influenced by liquidity clusters forming around the $3,400 mark.

These liquidity zones act as magnets during reversals, with traders closely watching to see if Ethereum could break the $3,450 resistance or retreat to lower support levels.

Any movement past this point could trigger large liquidations, shifting the market significantly.

What’s next for ETH?

Ethereum was testing the crucial $3,450 resistance. The next few hours were critical in determining whether ETH could break through or fall back toward support at $3,200.

Whale activity and liquidity pressure would heavily influence the outcome.


Final Thoughts

  • Whale activity created significant selling pressure near Ethereum’s $3,450 resistance, influencing key market reactions.
  • The market’s response to liquidity clusters and leveraged positions determined whether ETH could break through or retreat to support.

Related Questions

QWhat significant action did the Ethereum OG whale take on January 16th, and what was the value?

AThe Ethereum OG whale deposited 13,083 ETH, worth $43.35 million, into the Gemini exchange.

QDespite the large deposit, what does the whale's remaining ETH holding indicate?

AThe whale still holds 34,616 ETH, worth $115 million, which shows confidence in Ethereum's long-term prospects.

QWhat was the potential risk for the whale that took a highly leveraged short position of 18,261 ETH?

AIf the price of ETH had climbed to $3,380, the entire short position could have been liquidated and wiped out.

QWhy was the $3,400 price level significant for Ethereum's price action?

ASignificant liquidity clusters had formed around the $3,400 mark, making it a key level that could act as a magnet during price reversals and trigger large liquidations.

QWhat were the two possible price outcomes for ETH mentioned in the article, based on the resistance level?

AEthereum could either break through the $3,450 resistance level or fall back toward the $3,200 support level.

Related Reads

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

In a span of four days, Amazon announced an additional $25 billion investment, and Google pledged up to $40 billion—both direct competitors pouring over $65 billion into the same AI startup, Anthropic. Rather than a typical venture capital move, this signals the latest escalation in the cloud wars. The core of the deal is not equity but compute pre-orders: Anthropic must spend the majority of these funds on AWS and Google Cloud services and chips, effectively locking in massive future compute consumption. This reflects a shift in cloud market dynamics—enterprises now choose cloud providers based on which hosts the best AI models, not just price or stability. With OpenAI deeply tied to Microsoft, Anthropic’s Claude has become the only viable strategic asset for Google and Amazon to remain competitive. Anthropic’s annualized revenue has surged to $30 billion, and it is expanding into verticals like biotech, positioning itself as a cross-industry AI infrastructure layer. However, this funding comes with constraints: Anthropic’s independence is challenged as it balances two rival investors, its safety-first narrative faces pressure from regulatory scrutiny, and its path to IPO introduces new financial pressures. Globally, this accelerates a "tri-polar" closed-loop structure in AI infrastructure, with Microsoft-OpenAI, Google-Anthropic, and Amazon-Anthropic forming exclusive model-cloud alliances. In contrast, China’s landscape differs—investments like Alibaba and Tencent backing open-source model firm DeepSeek reflect a more decoupled approach, though closed-source models from major cloud providers still dominate. The $65 billion bet is ultimately about securing a seat at the table in an AI-defined future—where missing the model layer means losing the cloud war.

marsbit1h ago

Google and Amazon Simultaneously Invest Heavily in a Competitor: The Most Absurd Business Logic of the AI Era Is Becoming Reality

marsbit1h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

DeepSeek-V4 has been released as a preview open-source model, featuring 1 million tokens of context length as a baseline capability—previously a premium feature locked behind enterprise paywalls by major overseas AI firms. The official announcement, however, openly acknowledges computational constraints, particularly limited service throughput for the high-end DeepSeek-V4-Pro version due to restricted high-end computing power. Rather than competing on pure scale, DeepSeek adopts a pragmatic approach that balances algorithmic innovation with hardware realities in China’s AI ecosystem. The V4-Pro model uses a highly sparse architecture with 1.6T total parameters but only activates 49B during inference. It performs strongly in agentic coding, knowledge-intensive tasks, and STEM reasoning, competing closely with top-tier closed models like Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Opus 4.6 in certain scenarios. A key strategic product is the Flash edition, with 284B total parameters but only 13B activated—making it cost-effective and accessible for mid- and low-tier hardware, including domestic AI chips from Huawei (Ascend), Cambricon, and Hygon. This design supports broader adoption across developers and SMEs while stimulating China's domestic semiconductor ecosystem. Despite facing talent outflow and intense competition in user traffic—with rivals like Doubao and Qianwen leading in monthly active users—DeepSeek has maintained technical momentum. The release also comes amid reports of a new funding round targeting a valuation exceeding $10 billion, potentially setting a new record in China’s LLM sector. Ultimately, DeepSeek-V4 represents a shift toward open yet realistic infrastructure development in the constrained compute landscape of Chinese AI, emphasizing engineering efficiency and domestic hardware compatibility over pure model scale.

marsbit1h ago

Computing Power Constrained, Why Did DeepSeek-V4 Open Source?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片