Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) Officially Launched: Someone Finally Tackles the L2 Isolation Problem

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-30Last updated on 2026-03-30

Abstract

The Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) is a new framework designed to address the fragmentation and liquidity isolation caused by the proliferation of Layer 2 (L2) rollups on Ethereum. While L2s have successfully scaled Ethereum, they have created siloed ecosystems with separate liquidity pools, bridges, and infrastructure, forcing protocols to deploy across multiple chains and users to pay high costs and risks for cross-chain transactions. EEZ, funded by the Ethereum Foundation and co-initiated by Gnosis and Zisk, introduces synchronous composability between L1 and L2s. This allows smart contracts on an EEZ rollup to atomically call contracts on Ethereum mainnet or other EEZ rollups within a single transaction, eliminating the need for bridges. The result is shared liquidity, a unified security model, and a seamless user experience where assets and identities are portable across environments without explicit bridging steps. Built on Ethereum’s core values of openness, security, and decentralization, EEZ aims to reinforce Ethereum as the foundational settlement layer rather than allowing L2s to fork value away from it. The initiative is developed as open-source public infrastructure, with technical contributions from leaders like Jordi Baylina (creator of Circom) and support from projects including Aave and Centrifuge. EEZ is not a proprietary product but a community-driven effort to unify Ethereum’s economy into a single, composable system.

Author: The Ethereum Economic Zone

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: L2 has solved Ethereum's scaling problem, but in doing so, it has created a new issue: each chain is an isolated island, with fragmented liquidity, and users have to pay a cost every time they cross chains.

EEZ is funded by the Ethereum Foundation and jointly initiated by Gnosis and Zisk. Its core promise is synchronous composability between L1 and L2—contracts can make atomic calls across chains, no longer relying on bridges for connection.

This is one of the most noteworthy technical proposals in the context of the heated discussion around Ethereum's roadmap.

Full Text Below:

Ethereum's L2 ecosystem has solved one problem while creating another.

The scaling problem has been largely solved. Rollups work, transaction costs have decreased, and throughput has increased. That part is progressing well.

What hasn't progressed well is: each L2 has become its own isolated island. Separate liquidity, separate cross-chain bridges, separate wallet integrations, separate infrastructure—all of which already exist on the mainnet. Protocols that want to reach the entire ecosystem's users need to deploy on five chains and integrate with five sets of tools. Users move between them via cross-chain bridges, spending time and money each time, and occasionally losing everything.

Moreover, each L2 isn't extending Ethereum; it's extracting value and creating new walled gardens. We are facing a recurrence of the very problems this industry was built to solve.

This is not what Ethereum scaling was supposed to look like.

What We Are Building

The Ethereum Economic Zone is a framework between L1 and L2, built around one principle: Rollups should extend Ethereum, not fork away from it.

EEZ rollups will achieve synchronous composability with the Ethereum mainnet. Smart contracts deployed on an EEZ rollup can call a smart contract on the mainnet, or a contract on another EEZ rollup, receive a response, and use it within a single transaction. The result is atomic cross-chain execution, anchored and secured on Ethereum. Shared liquidity, a unified security model.

What does this mean in practice:

For Ethereum, EEZ rollups aim to strengthen the role of the base layer. ETH remains the gas token, the settlement layer, and the source of truth. Activity on rollups doesn't extract value from Ethereum; it builds on top of it, drawing from its security.

For protocols, complexity is drastically reduced. Instead of deploying and maintaining multiple versions on multiple chains, a protocol can deploy once and rely on synchronous composability to reach all users across the EEZ. No need to manage cross-chain bridges, wrapped assets, or chain-specific integrations.

For users, the experience is closer to what one intuitively expects: one Ethereum. Assets, positions, and identities are available across environments without explicit cross-chain steps. In most cases, gas can be paid in ETH, regardless of where execution happens.

We are building this framework according to Ethereum's core values: open source, secure, trust-minimized, censorship-resistant, minimalist, and community-driven.

Why Us

A fair question, we'll answer it briefly.

Gnosis has been building Ethereum infrastructure since the first week smart contracts went live, literally the first week. Our first transaction on Ethereum happened in August 2015. Since then, our engineers have built the constant product AMM model (the basis for much of DeFi), the conditional tokens framework (now used by Polymarket), the CoW Protocol (pioneering batch auctions and intent-based trading), and Safe (the first production-grade smart contract wallet, safeguarding over $58 billion). We have operated Gnosis Chain for seven years without interruption. We know how to deliver infrastructure that doesn't break.

We are also highly aligned with Ethereum itself. Gnosis DAO holds a significant amount of ETH, which means the success of Ethereum as a system is not an abstract concept for us; it directly relates to what we are building.

On the technical side, much of the work is led by Jordi Baylina, the creator of Circom, who has been at the forefront of zero-knowledge proof systems for years. His work on zkEVM is among the most battle-tested ZK infrastructure in production, and he is also the founder of Zisk—a high-performance proving stack that will be used in the EEZ.

The Ethereum Foundation is funding this work. The EEZ is designed to be credibly neutral, shared Ethereum infrastructure, not owned by Gnosis or any single entity.

We are building it because it needs to exist, and because we have a track record of delivering.

What This Is Not

EEZ is not a product of any single team. Gnosis and Zisk are founding contributors, but the goal is to build shared Ethereum infrastructure. The EEZ Association, based in Switzerland, is a newly formed entity specifically tasked with developing it as fully open-source public infrastructure. All work will be released as free and open-source software, and contributions are welcome. This is not a closed group but an open effort to build infrastructure the entire Ethereum ecosystem can rely on.

It is not an L2 framework, but a framework *between* L1 and L2. This distinction is important. Instead of extending isolated execution environments and connecting them asynchronously, this is a fundamentally different architecture—"composability" here truly means composability: smart contracts can call each other atomically across execution environments.

It is also not just an idea. It traces back to early Ethereum research, including execution sharding. What's new is that recent advances in real-time proving technology have made it feasible. Jordi and our team have been working on this for months behind the scenes. We are announcing it now because the technical foundation is solid enough to share. Specifications and benchmarks will follow.

What's Next

We are building a coalition of infrastructure teams, protocols, block builders, and ecosystem contributors who recognize Ethereum as the world's most important economic zone and are committed to unifying the ecosystem. Other founding members include Aave, Titan, Beaver Build, Centrifuge, xStocks, and we welcome more core contributors from across the ecosystem to join.

This is not intended to be a closed group. If you are a protocol team, infrastructure builder, or simply believe Ethereum should function as one system, not a hundred, we want to hear from you.

In the coming weeks, we will release: the technical architecture and protocol specifications, performance benchmarks, developer tools and ecosystem integration details, and a clear path for existing Ethereum protocols to integrate with the EEZ.

Ethereum delivers maximum value when it functions as a unified, composable economy.

Not a collection of fiefdoms connected by bridges, not fifty versions of the same DEX with fifty liquidity pools on fifty chains.

One Ethereum. EEZ.

Friederike Ernst is a co-founder of Gnosis. Jordi Baylina is the founder of Zisk. The Ethereum Economic Zone is funded for development by the Ethereum Foundation.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main problem that the Ethereum Economic Zone (EEZ) aims to solve?

AThe EEZ aims to solve the problem of L2 fragmentation, where each L2 acts as an isolated island with separate liquidity, bridges, and infrastructure, leading to a poor user experience and value extraction from Ethereum.

QHow does the EEZ achieve synchronous composability between L1 and L2?

AThe EEZ enables smart contracts deployed on an EEZ rollup to call contracts on the Ethereum mainnet or another EEZ rollup within a single transaction, receiving a response and using it atomically, all anchored to Ethereum's security.

QWhich organizations are the founding contributors to the EEZ initiative?

AThe EEZ is jointly initiated by Gnosis and Zisk, with funding from the Ethereum Foundation, and it includes other founding members like Aave, Titan, Beaver Build, Centrifuge, and xStocks.

QWhat are the expected benefits for protocols building within the EEZ framework?

AProtocols can deploy once and leverage synchronous composability to reach users across the entire EEZ, eliminating the need to manage multiple deployments, cross-chain bridges, wrapped assets, or chain-specific integrations.

QIs the EEZ a proprietary product owned by a single entity?

ANo, the EEZ is designed as open-source, shared Ethereum infrastructure. It is not owned by Gnosis or any single entity but is developed as a community-driven, trust-minimized public good.

Related Reads

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit4m ago

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit4m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit58m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit58m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片