Crypto Vs. Banks: Key CLARITY Act Meetings This Week And What They Could Decide

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-24Last updated on 2026-03-24

Abstract

Negotiations on the CLARITY Act, a key crypto market-structure bill, are nearing completion, though final language remains undisclosed. Senator Cynthia Lummis stated talks are "99% resolved" on stablecoin yields, a central issue where banks fear deposit flight and crypto firms seek viable yield options. A reported White House compromise with senators may limit yield on idle balances to address banking concerns. Crypto and banking groups are meeting with the Senate Banking Committee this week to review the draft. Unresolved areas include DeFi, token classification, and tokenization. A committee markup is anticipated in mid-to-late April.

Negotiations over the CLARITY Act — the Senate’s long‐anticipated crypto market‐structure bill — appear to be nearing a conclusion, but key details remain under wraps, and no official date has been set for a Senate Banking Committee markup.

Industry sources and reporters tracking the talks say progress has been significant, yet the bill’s final language and whether it will resolve the long‐running dispute between banks and crypto firms have not been publicly confirmed.

Banks’ Concerns Addressed

Senator Cynthia Lummis, who chairs the Senate Banking Committee’s digital assets subcommittee and has been a lead negotiator, told colleagues that talks are “99% of the way to resolution” on the thorny issue of stablecoin yield.

This signals that negotiators believe they are close to bridging a central divide: banks’ concern that yield on stablecoin deposits could prompt deposit flight and strain traditional lending, versus crypto firms’ desire for commercially viable yield options.

Reporting by Eleanor Terrett of Crypto In America added new detail to the picture. Terrett said the White House has tentatively reached a compromise with Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks, who have worked for nearly two months to hammer out language tied to the CLARITY Act.

According to Terrett, the draft reportedly acknowledges banking sector worries and would likely include measures aimed at limiting yield on idle balances. Banking sources told Terrett they do not yet know the precise contents of the text and said the provision has been kept closely held.

Senate To Hear Crypto, Banking Feedback This Week

Industry engagement with the process is continuing this week. Crypto trade association representatives are scheduled to meet with the Senate Banking Committee later Monday, while banking groups are set to review the draft text on Tuesday.

Those briefings will be critical: crypto stakeholders must decide whether the compromise language is acceptable, and banks will review whether the bill sufficiently addresses their deposit‐flight concerns.

While the draft reportedly will include a ban on yield on idle balances, other sensitive topics remain unresolved. Terrett reported that the bill still needs work on several areas, including decentralized finance (DeFi), token classification, and tokenization.

Those sections will require careful drafting to balance innovation, investor protection, and financial stability before the Banking Committee’s chair, Senator Tim Scott, can move to schedule a markup.

As NewsBTC reported last Friday, some sources suggest that a markup could occur between mid and late April, though no formal scheduling has been announced by the Banking Committee.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap’s Monday surge to $2.4 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the main focus of the CLARITY Act negotiations this week?

AThe main focus is on resolving the long-running dispute between banks and crypto firms, particularly concerning stablecoin yield and addressing banks' concerns about potential deposit flight.

QAccording to Senator Cynthia Lummis, how close are negotiators to resolving the stablecoin yield issue?

ASenator Cynthia Lummis stated that negotiations are '99% of the way to resolution' on the stablecoin yield issue.

QWhich two senators did the White House tentatively reach a compromise with regarding the CLARITY Act?

AThe White House tentatively reached a compromise with Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks.

QWhat specific measure is the draft bill expected to include to address banking sector worries?

AThe draft bill is expected to include measures aimed at limiting yield on idle balances to address banking sector concerns.

QWhat are some of the unresolved topics that still need work in the CLARITY Act according to the reporting?

AAccording to the reporting, the bill still needs work on several areas including decentralized finance (DeFi), token classification, and tokenization.

Related Reads

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbit13h ago

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbit13h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbit14h ago

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbit14h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbit15h ago

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbit15h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片