Crypto leaders join CFTC panel as U.S. pushes ‘pro-innovation’ rules

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-13Last updated on 2026-02-13

Abstract

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has formed an Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC) under the Trump Administration, comprising leaders from both crypto and traditional finance sectors. Members include executives from Coinbase, Uniswap, Ripple, Chainlink, and Solana, as well as representatives from prediction markets and major financial institutions like Nasdaq and the London Stock Exchange. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated the committee aims to develop adaptive regulations to keep pace with innovations in blockchain and AI, ensuring the agency’s rules reflect market realities. The move is seen as a shift from the previous administration’s enforcement-heavy approach. Industry leaders, including Uniswap’s Hayden Adams and Chainlink’s Sergey Nazarov, welcomed the initiative as a positive development for DeFi, tokenization, and the broader crypto ecosystem.

The Donald Trump Administration has formed a new advisory team, the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC), filled with crypto and traditional finance leaders to help drive American innovation.

On the 13th of February, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) unveiled the members of the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC).

Players from the crypto industry include Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong, Uniswap’s CEO Hayden Adams, Ripple’s Brad Garlinghouse, Chainlink Labs’ Sergey Nazarov, and Solana’s Anatoly Yakovenko, among others.

On the prediction markets segment, Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan and Kalshi’s Tarek Mansour. Additionally, leaders from sport betting platforms FanDuel and DraftKings were tapped.

On the traditional finance side, Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) CEO Frank LaSalla, London Stock Exchange CEO David Schwimmer, Nasdaq CEO Adena Friedman, and others.

CFTC’s end-game

Academic and interest group representatives are also part of the team to provide a balance on tech updates and breakthroughs. According to CFTC chair Mike Selig, this was an ‘energizing moment’ for the regulator, adding that,

“The IAC’s work will help ensure the CFTC’s decisions reflect market realities so the agency can future-proof its markets and develop clear rules of the road for the Golden Age of American financial markets.”

Selig added that the committee will help CFTC formulate adaptive regulations for new breakthroughs in blockchain and AI that are transforming financial markets. He added,

“By bringing together participants from every corner of the marketplace, the IAC will be a major asset for the Commission as we work to modernize our rules and regulations for the innovations of today and tomorrow.”

Great for DeFi and broader crypto?

It’s worth noting that Selig first signaled the move in late January, calling for ‘fit-for-purpose’ regulation of new technologies disrupting financial markets.

Interestingly, the update also comes at a crucial time for prediction markets. The regulator recently withdrew a Biden-era rule that banned event contracts tied to sports and political activities.

Selig said the move was the agency’s ‘commitment to lawful innovation,’ underscoring the pro-crypto and pro-innovation pivot under the Trump Administration.

Reacting to the latest IAC update, Uniswap’s Hayden Adams said,

“Last admin’s CFTC only wanted to talk via subpoenas and enforcement. And lots of builders on this IAC! A great sign for the future of the agency.”

Similarly, Chainlink Labs’ Nazarov echoed Adams’ enthusiasm and expected the move to be bullish for tokenization, DeFi, and crypto overall.


Final Thoughts

  • CFTC chair forms an advisory team to help prepare the agency to form adaptive regulations.
  • Crypto leaders viewed the move as positive for the industry and a U-turn from the previous administration’s enforcement actions.

Related Questions

QWhat is the name of the new advisory committee formed by the CFTC, and what is its purpose?

AThe new advisory committee is called the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC). Its purpose is to help the CFTC drive American innovation, ensure its decisions reflect market realities, and develop adaptive regulations for new technologies like blockchain and AI.

QName at least three crypto industry leaders who are members of the newly formed CFTC committee.

AThree crypto industry leaders on the committee are Brian Armstrong (Coinbase), Hayden Adams (Uniswap), and Brad Garlinghouse (Ripple).

QAccording to CFTC Chair Mike Selig, what two key technologies is the committee tasked with helping to formulate regulations for?

AThe committee is tasked with helping to formulate regulations for blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI).

QWhat recent action did the CFTC take regarding prediction markets, and how did the chairman describe this move?

AThe CFTC withdrew a Biden-era rule that banned event contracts tied to sports and political activities. Chairman Selig described this move as a demonstration of the agency's 'commitment to lawful innovation'.

QHow did Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams characterize the difference between the current CFTC's approach and that of the previous administration?

AHayden Adams said that the previous administration's CFTC 'only wanted to talk via subpoenas and enforcement,' contrasting it with the new committee which includes many builders, calling it a 'great sign for the future of the agency.'

Related Reads

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit47m ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit47m ago

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Elon Musk's much-anticipated "WeChat-like" app, XChat, has officially launched after multiple delays. The initial review reveals a product that falls short of expectations, offering an experience largely similar to X Platform's (formerly Twitter) direct messages, despite being marketed as an encrypted communication tool. Key observations from the first-day test include: 1. The app's promoted "end-to-end encryption" and its claimed relation to Bitcoin's architecture were criticized by experts as a superficial attempt to capitalize on crypto buzz, with no real technical connection. 2. Musk's vision of an ad-free "secure communication system" is technically met, but only because the app is currently extremely basic, featuring only a single chat interface. 3. A promised anti-screenshot feature appears inconsistent; it works in X Platform group chats but fails within the XChat app itself, where screenshots still capture avatars. 4. The app supports 45 languages and has a 16+ age rating, indicating a broader tolerance for content compared to WeChat's 13+ rating. 5. A puzzling login process requires users to verify the email associated with their X account. 6. The touted encryption" feels minimal in practice, with its presence only indicated by a simple "Encrypted - Yes" label on messages. 7. Disappearing message timers for groups can be set from 5 minutes to 4 weeks, with the timer starting upon being read by a user. 8. Group invite links are shared with X Platform groups. 9. Group size limits are planned to be increased, aiming for 1000 members, a move that has drawn user criticism. 10. The app offers 8 different colored icons, and its chat bubbles are notably similar to WeChat's. Message deletion options mimic Telegram's. Crucially, many pre-announced features like importing X contacts, integrating Grok AI, X Money payments, and Cashtags are not yet available. The initial release is seen as a bare-bones and underwhelming first step.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

First Day Review of "Musk's WeChat" XChat: Even Worse Than Expected

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片