Coinbase Escalates Fight With Australian Banks Over Crypto Bans

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-05Last updated on 2026-02-05

Abstract

Coinbase has formally complained to Australia's parliament, accusing the country's four major banks—Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, ANZ, and National Australia Bank—of blocking or shutting down services for legitimate crypto firms without warning. The exchange argues these actions create significant barriers for crypto businesses that depend on banking services. It calls for mandatory rules requiring banks to provide explanations, advance notice, dispute channels, and transparent compliance checks. Banks defend their actions by citing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing risks, stating that some crypto activities are difficult to monitor. The issue particularly affects smaller crypto firms, forcing some to consider moving operations overseas. Parliamentary hearings are expected to address the conflict between financial safety and business access, potentially leading to clearer regulations or stronger oversight.

Coinbase has taken a louder stand against Australia’s biggest banks, saying those banks are shutting down or blocking services for legitimate crypto firms.

The exchange lodged a formal complaint with the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics and argues that the problem goes beyond occasional account closures — it has become a common barrier for companies that rely on bank accounts and payment rails to do business.

Coinbase Raises Formal Complaint

Based on reports, Coinbase asks for clearer rules and more fairness. It wants banks to explain why they close accounts, give at least 30 days’ notice before cutting services, set up dispute channels, and publish compliance checks.

Coinbase submitted a report to the House’s SCE, naming Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, ANZ, and National Australia Bank. It alleges the banks are closing accounts without warning and blocking crypto-related transactions.

Reports say the company also calls on lawmakers to make those rules mandatory so firms can’t be cut off without cause.

One study cited in coverage found as much as 60% of some fintechs were denied banking in recent years, and Coinbase uses figures like that to show the problem is widespread.

Banks Cite Risk And Compliance Concerns

Banks respond that they act to meet anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorism financing rules. They argue that some crypto activity is hard to monitor and that cutting ties can be a compliance step when risk can’t be clearly managed.

Bank customers and regulators want safe payment systems, and banks say they must weigh that against new business lines.

Total crypto market cap currently at $2.53 trillion. Chart: TradingView

At times, actions by lenders are reactive; at other times they follow formal internal policies. That difference matters because it affects how easy it is for a firm to appeal a decision.

Who Gets Hurt When Banking Is Closed

Small exchanges, payment processors, and other crypto services feel the squeeze. When a bank ends a relationship, transactions slow, wages need alternative accounts, and trust gets strained.

Reports say some startups consider moving operations overseas where banking is more welcoming. That risk has policy implications: if local fintechs leave, jobs go with them and the country may miss out on new services. The result is a tug-of-war between financial safety and business access.

What Comes Next For Regulators

Parliamentary hearings are now a likely next step, and those sessions could press banks for more detail and push regulators to set clearer rules.

Australia’s financial watchdogs have discussed the issue before but stopped short of forcing banks to change. The committee will hear evidence, and it can recommend legal changes or stronger guidance to make sure account closures are tracked and justified.

Featured image by Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Related Questions

QWhat formal action has Coinbase taken against Australian banks regarding crypto service restrictions?

ACoinbase has lodged a formal complaint with the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, accusing major Australian banks of blocking or shutting down services for legitimate crypto firms.

QWhich specific Australian banks did Coinbase name in its complaint?

ACoinbase named Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, ANZ, and National Australia Bank in its formal complaint.

QWhat reasons do banks give for restricting services to crypto-related firms?

ABanks cite anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing compliance concerns, stating that some crypto activities are difficult to monitor and pose risks that are hard to manage.

QWhat percentage of fintechs were reportedly denied banking services according to the study mentioned?

AThe study cited in the coverage found that as much as 60% of some fintechs were denied banking services in recent years.

QWhat potential consequence does the article mention if Australian crypto startups move operations overseas?

AIf local crypto startups move operations overseas due to banking restrictions, jobs may be lost and Australia could miss out on new financial services and innovations.

Related Reads

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手10h ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手10h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit13h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit13h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手14h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手14h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片