Coinbase and Ripple CEOs Join CFTC Advisory Panel Overseeing Digital Assets

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-13Last updated on 2026-02-13

Abstract

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has formed a new advisory committee focused on digital assets, appointing key industry leaders including Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse. The committee, established under the Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act, will provide expertise on regulatory and market developments. It includes representatives from crypto exchanges, stablecoin issuers, derivatives desks, and blockchain firms. The group will meet at least four times in 2026 to address issues like compliance, risk management, market transparency, and regulatory coordination. Their input will help shape future CFTC rules and oversight approaches for digital asset markets.

The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced appointments to a new committee that would provide advice on regulatory and industry developments regarding digital assets. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong confirmed his position as a member of the committee representing crypto exchange interests. The advisory committee also has Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse as a member, offering information from a prominent payments blockchain company. The committee has various members representing companies in digital assets, finance, and blockchain technology. The committee also has members from a company that issues a stablecoin and a derivatives desk manager.

CFTC Chairman Rostin Behnam stated the committee would assist in helping regulators grasp the intricacies of the digital market. The members would contribute their expertise and knowledge from the digital asset marketplace. This advisory committee would meet at least four times in 2026 to discuss the problems regulators face in their work. The CFTC formed the committee through the Digital Commodities Consumer Protection Act’s powers. They would concentrate their focus on market issues such as compliance and risk management.

The committee has executives from companies such as Paxos, Cumberland, Galaxy Digital, among other companies. A representative of the stablecoin issuer has knowledge of liquidity and a framework for redemption. The diversity of the group is evident since there is knowledge on trading platforms, derivatives exchanges, and blockchain operations. The members of the CFTC’s advisory panel are compliance experts and know legal issues. The committee has experts from fintech and blockchain-based think tanks. The experts know derivatives exchanges, clearing operations, and blockchain operations.

Committee Aims and Regulatory Role

The Advisory Group will review options for enhancing digital asset markets under U.S. laws. The members will be able to review the risk issues faced by participants in the digital markets, whether retail or institutional. The members will also give opinions on compliance issues faced and law enforcement. The panel may also discuss transparency issues in digital markets in the U.S. The issue of coordination between U.S. regulatory authorities may also come up.

The committee members may assist the CFTC in oversight roles for new technologies. These could involve data infrastructures and market settlement systems. The contributions from the members to the CFTC may shape the proposals for future rules set forth by the agency.

Highlighted Crypto News:

U.S. Bankers Urge OCC to Slow Crypto Trust Bank Charters

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

Intel CEO Chen Liwu outlines a bold vision for the company's transformation in a podcast interview, targeting a "10x return in 5-10 years." He emphasizes a strategic shift beyond traditional process node scaling, focusing on advanced packaging (like EMIB), new materials (glass substrates, GaN, SiC, InP, synthetic diamond), and system-level integration. Key to this is Intel's foundry business, where he prioritizes building trust through superior yield, defect density, and cycle times. Chen sees strong CPU demand resurgence driven by agent AI and inference workloads. He details the Terafab collaboration with Elon Musk to address semiconductor infrastructure gaps and stresses the strategic importance of U.S.-based advanced manufacturing. Acknowledging Intel is still in the "crawl" phase of his crawl-walk-run framework, Chen believes the company's full potential—extending from its PC base into edge computing and physical AI—will become apparent by 2030-2032.

marsbit8m ago

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

marsbit8m ago

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbit9m ago

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbit9m ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbit2h ago

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbit2h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbit2h ago

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbit2h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbit2h ago

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures

Coinbase and Ripple CEOs Join CFTC Advisory Panel Overseeing Digital Assets

Abstract

Committee Aims and Regulatory Role

Related Questions

Related Reads

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Trading