Claude Helps Man Recover 5 Bitcoins Forgotten for 11 Years, Worth Nearly $400,000

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-14Last updated on 2026-05-14

Abstract

AI Chatbot Claude Helps Man Recover 5 Bitcoins Forgotten for 11 Years, Worth Nearly $400,000 A user named Cprkrn recovered a Bitcoin wallet containing 5 BTC (~$400,000), locked for over 11 years, with the help of Anthropic's AI, Claude. The wallet was originally locked after Cprkrn changed its password while under the influence in university and subsequently forgot it. Claude did not crack the password. Instead, after Cprkrn uploaded all files from his old university computer, Claude sifted through the data and located an earlier, pre-password-change version of the encrypted wallet file (wallet.dat). Cprkrn had also recently found a handwritten seed phrase, but it was incompatible with the main wallet file. Claude's key breakthrough was identifying and fixing a bug in the open-source recovery tool `btcrecover`, which had been concatenating the shared key and user password in the wrong order. After correcting this logic error and running the decryption process, Claude successfully extracted the private key, allowing the funds to be accessed and transferred. While the post garnered over 10 million views and sparked excitement, wallet recovery experts noted Claude's role was more akin to AI-assisted digital forensics—organizing unstructured historical data, diagnosing tool issues, and executing a corrected process—rather than true cryptographic password cracking. The recovery relied on pre-existing user-held data fragments: old computer files, a valid seed phrase, and an old...

Author: Claude, Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: An X platform user imported all old college computer files into Anthropic's AI chatbot Claude and successfully recovered a Bitcoin wallet that had been locked for over 11 years, containing 5 BTC, worth approximately $400,000 at current prices. Claude did not brute-force the password. Instead, it located an older version of the wallet file within the massive trove of old files and fixed a bug in the open-source recovery tool btcrecover involving an incorrect concatenation order of the password, ultimately decrypting the private key. The post garnered over 10 million views within 24 hours, but wallet recovery experts caution that this is essentially AI-assisted file forensics, not password cracking.

An X platform user using the pseudonym Cprkrn posted on May 13th, stating that Anthropic's AI model Claude helped him recover a Bitcoin wallet that had been locked for over 11 years, containing 5 BTC, worth approximately $398,000 at the day's price of around $79,600 per coin.

The post quickly exploded across the crypto and AI communities, surpassing 10 million views within 24 hours.

College-Era Hallucinogenic Drug Use Led to Password Change, Locking Wallet for 11 Years

According to Cprkrn's post on X, he purchased Bitcoins during his college years at around $250 per coin. Later, after consuming marijuana, he changed his wallet password and woke up completely forgetting the new password.

The original password was quite personal in style... as disclosed by him, it was "lol420fuckthePOLICE!*:)".

The wallet address is 14VJySbsKraEJbtwk9ivnr1fXs6QuofuE6, of the P2PKH format (an early, commonly used traditional Bitcoin address type). According to bitcoin.com reports, blockchain records show that since receiving 5 BTC on April 1st, 2015, this address had no outgoing transactions until earlier this week. Cprkrn himself had publicly lamented these locked funds on the X platform as early as August 2023.

Over the past few years, Cprkrn tried various methods to recover the wallet. He spent about $250 on commercial recovery services, all of which failed; he claimed to have also tried about "7 trillion" password combinations, using common recovery tools like btcrecover and Hashcat, all to no avail. He waited until the Bitcoin price exceeded $100,000 before deciding to initiate a serious new attempt.

Claude Locates Old Wallet File, Fixes Recovery Tool Bug to Complete Decryption

According to bitcoin.com, the breakthrough occurred after Cprkrn imported all files from his old college computer into Claude. Claude located an earlier version of the encrypted wallet file (wallet.dat) within the massive dataset, with a timestamp preceding that fateful password change.

Meanwhile, Cprkrn had found a handwritten seed phrase a few weeks earlier by chance. However, this seed phrase could not unlock the current wallet file. Claude's key contribution was discovering the technical root cause: the open-source recovery tool btcrecover had the concatenation order of the shared key and the user password reversed during the decryption process. Claude corrected this logical error, reran the decryption process, and successfully extracted the private key in WIF format.

Cprkrn shared a screenshot of Claude's output interface on the X platform. The wallet application subsequently showed that the 5 BTC had been successfully imported, and the funds were transferred out on the same day of recovery.

Expert Debate: AI-Assisted Forensics, Not Password Cracking

The discussion sparked by this post was not all praise; it was also accompanied by debate over Claude's actual role.

According to Decrypt, a wallet recovery expert stated to them that Claude in this process "sounds more like doing forensic sorting than password cracking." Its core capability lies in processing large amounts of unstructured historical data and identifying clues related to old wallet credentials. Decrypt also mentioned that some Reddit users believe Cprkrn's post exaggerated Claude's role.

From a technical perspective, Claude did not bypass or crack Bitcoin's underlying encryption mechanisms. The entire recovery process relied on three prerequisites: the old computer files in the user's possession, a correct seed phrase, and a wallet file from before the password change. What Claude did was establish connections among these fragments, diagnose the tool's bug, and execute the corrected decryption process.

According to bitcoin.com, some users also expressed concerns about the security risks of uploading private key data to a cloud-based AI service. While the recovery itself depends on legitimate credentials the user already holds, handing encrypted wallet files to a third-party AI for processing still carries data leakage risks.

One-Third of Bitcoin Lies Dormant in Forgotten Wallets

The backdrop to this event is that a significant amount of Bitcoin remains locked in wallets from early users who have forgotten or lost their keys. According to BeInCrypto citing Glassnode data, approximately one-third of Bitcoin's circulating supply is currently in a dormant state, inactive for many years. Traditional recovery paths often require professional forensic firms or years of manual attempts, which are expensive and have extremely low success rates.

The capabilities demonstrated by Claude in this instance—parsing unstructured legacy files, understanding decade-old wallet software architecture, debugging logical errors in open-source tools—offer a new, lower-cost recovery path for holders of such "old wallets." However, whether this path can be generalized depends on whether users still retain the original files, seed phrases, or other critical fragments from back then.

Cprkrn stated at the end of his post that he plans to name his child after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei. Considering he just gained an extra ~$400,000 out of thin air, this might not be too crazy an idea (laughs).

Related Questions

QWhat was the core technical issue that prevented the user from recovering his Bitcoin wallet with existing tools like btcrecover, and how did Claude solve it?

AThe core technical issue was that the open-source recovery tool btcrecover had a bug where it concatenated the shared key and the user password in the wrong order during the decryption process. Claude identified this logic error, corrected the sequence, and successfully ran the decryption process to extract the WIF-format private key.

QWhat are the three key prerequisites that enabled Claude to assist in recovering the 11-year-old Bitcoin wallet, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, the three key prerequisites were: 1) The user's old computer files, 2) A correct handwritten seed phrase (mnemonic) found weeks earlier, and 3) An earlier version of the encrypted wallet file (wallet.dat) with a timestamp prior to the password change.

QWhat controversy or differing opinions did the article mention regarding Claude's role in the wallet recovery process?

AThe article mentioned that a wallet recovery expert argued Claude was performing "forensic sorting" rather than password cracking. The expert clarified that its core ability was processing unstructured historical data to identify clues. Additionally, some Reddit users believed the user's post exaggerated Claude's role, and others raised security concerns about uploading private key data to a cloud AI service.

QWhat is the broader context regarding the amount of Bitcoin currently considered lost or dormant, as cited in the article?

AThe article cites Glassnode data indicating that approximately one-third of the current circulating Bitcoin supply is dormant in wallets that have been inactive for many years, often lost or forgotten by their original owners.

QWhat was the user's initial investment for the 5 Bitcoins, and what event caused him to forget the wallet password?

AThe user initially purchased the Bitcoins for about $250 per coin during his college years. He forgot the new password after changing it while under the influence of marijuana, and the wallet remained locked for 11 years.

Related Reads

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit6m ago

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit6m ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手6m ago

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手6m ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit2h ago

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit2h ago

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

The article discusses the immense popularity of the "2x Long SK Hynix ETF" (07709.HK) in Hong Kong, which became the world's largest single-stock leveraged ETF by May 2026. Launched in October 2025, the ETF's net value soared over 1000% in seven months, significantly outperforming the 324% gain of SK Hynix's underlying stock, driven by the AI boom and a critical shift in industry demand from computing power to memory. It highlights the mechanics and risks of daily-rebalanced leveraged ETFs. In a smooth bullish market, they generate amplified returns, but during volatile periods—exemplified by market swings during geopolitical tensions in the Strait of Hormuz in March-April 2026—they suffer severe "volatility decay," where choppy price action can cause losses far exceeding twice the drop of the underlying asset. The piece frames SK Hynix, as NVIDIA's primary HBM supplier, within the classic cycle of the memory chip industry—a commoditized sector prone to boom-and-bust cycles of shortage, price hikes, overcapacity, and crashes. While current AI-driven demand and high margins (Q1 2026毛利率~79%) create a "super cycle," the article questions its sustainability. It warns that extreme profits will inevitably tempt competitors like Samsung and Micron to ramp up HBM production, potentially eroding scarcity. Furthermore, the entire narrative remains tethered to the massive AI capital expenditure of tech giants. In conclusion, the ETF's trajectory symbolizes the accelerated, all-in nature of the current AI revolution, where timeframes are compressed and market moves are extreme. However, it also underscores that while industry trends define ultimate returns, macro-geopolitical risks dictate the volatile and uncertain path to get there.

marsbit2h ago

“Why Didn’t You Buy 2x Long SK Hynix?”

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片