CLARITY Act May Not Pass Before April, Says Senate Leader John Thune

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-13Last updated on 2026-03-13

Abstract

Senate Majority Leader John Thune stated that the CLARITY Act, a key cryptocurrency market structure bill, is unlikely to be considered before April. The legislation aims to clarify regulatory roles for digital assets in the U.S., specifically defining the responsibilities of agencies like the SEC and CFTC. Lawmakers are currently prioritizing other pressing issues, including the SAVE America Act. Thune expressed hope that the market structure bill would advance later, though not immediately. There are concerns that delays could hinder U.S. competitiveness, as other countries like China may gain ground in crypto innovation. Despite the postponement, there is optimism that the bill could pass in 2026 if negotiations proceed smoothly. The act seeks to reduce regulatory uncertainty and support innovation in the digital asset market.

John Thune, the leader of the U.S Senate majority, said that lawmakers may consider delaying the legislation on the crypto market structure until April. He said that the Senate Banking Committee may consider it later. Since lawmakers are currently busy working on other pressing issues. The proposed legislation, known as the CLARITY Act, aims to help lawmakers clarify rules governing digital assets and cryptocurrencies in the US.
The lawmakers proposed the legislation to clarify the roles that different regulators play in the management of digital assets and the overall financial market.

In post X by Eleanor Terret, indicate that the Senate will focus on the SAVE America Act first before the crypto market structure bill. Thune said, “Market structure is a bill that’s, I’m hoping, going to come out soon.” He added that the legislation will probably move forward “probably not before, I would say, the April time period.”

Lawmakers discussed various policy issues related to stablecoin regulation and financial oversight when they shared these comments. Industry observers closely watch these developments because they could significantly influence future cryptocurrency regulations. The lawmakers had already moved previous versions of these bills through House committees during previous discussions. However, Senate leaders are now indicating that they will tackle other legislative priorities before considering cryptocurrency bills.

Debate Over Crypto Regulation Continues

Donald Trump has indicated that continued delays in the regulation of the crypto market could affect the U.S digital asset market. According to Trump, continued delays could allow other countries, like China. This was to have a better position in the world’s cryptocurrency market. He stated that continued delays in the legislation could allow innovation and development to occur outside the United States.

The regulators are working on clarifying the responsibilities that different bodies, like the SEC and CFTC in the United States, have in regulating digital assets. This is in a bid to reduce the uncertainty that exists in the digital assets market and the investments that occur in the market. There is optimism among lawmakers regarding the legislation despite the proposed adjustments that are expected in the Senate. There is a likelihood that the legislation could be passed later in 2026 if everything goes smoothly in the negotiations.

According to different policy analysts, the legislation could be passed later in 2026 if everything goes smoothly in the negotiations. There are continued calls by different bodies for lawmakers to establish clear regulations that support innovation in the digital assets market.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Crypto Miners Turn to Asset Strategies as Profit Pressures Intensify

TagsBitcoinBitcoin (BTC)BlockchainClarity ACTU.S SenateUS Senate

Related Questions

QWhat is the CLARITY Act and what is its primary purpose?

AThe CLARITY Act is proposed legislation that aims to clarify the rules governing digital assets and cryptocurrencies in the US, specifically by defining the roles that different regulators play in their management and the overall financial market.

QAccording to Senate Leader John Thune, when is the crypto market structure bill likely to be considered?

ASenate Leader John Thune stated that the crypto market structure bill will probably not be considered until the April time period, as lawmakers are currently focused on other pressing issues like the SAVE America Act.

QWhy are industry observers closely watching the developments around this legislation?

AIndustry observers are closely watching these developments because the legislation could significantly influence future cryptocurrency regulations in the United States.

QWhat concern did Donald Trump raise regarding delays in U.S. crypto regulation?

ADonald Trump indicated that continued delays in regulating the crypto market could allow other countries, like China, to gain a better position in the world's cryptocurrency market, causing innovation and development to occur outside the United States.

QWhich U.S. regulatory bodies are working to clarify their responsibilities in regulating digital assets?

ARegulators like the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) are working on clarifying their responsibilities in regulating digital assets to reduce market uncertainty.

Related Reads

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit59m ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit59m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbit59m ago

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbit59m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片